Sounds on the Margins of Language at the Heart of Interaction

References

• Akita, K., & Dingemanse, M. (2019). Ideophones (Mimetics, Expressives). In M. Aronoff (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia for linguistics. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borràs-Comes, J., Kaland, C., Prieto, P., & Swerts, M. (2014). Audiovisual correlates of interrogativity: A Comparative analysis of Catalan and Dutch. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 38(1), 53–66. doi:10.1007/s10919-013-0162-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. (2016). Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review, 123(3), 324–347. doi:10.1037/rev0000026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Ford, C. (Eds.). (2004). Sound patterns in interaction. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (Eds.). (1996). Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M. (2017). On the margins of language: Ideophones, interjections and dependencies in linguistic theory. In N. J. Enfield (Ed.), Dependencies in language (pp. 195–202). Berlin, Germany: Language Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M. (2018). Redrawing the margins of language: Lessons from research on ideophones. Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M. (2020). Between sound and speech: Liminal signs in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 188–196.
   Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J. (2009). The anatomy of meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. (2002). When listeners talk: Response tokens and recipient stance with special reference to Mm. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Gil, D. (2013). Para-Linguistic usages of clicks. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath Eds., The world atlas of language structures online. Retrieved from http://wals.info/chapter/142
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, P., & Holt, E. (Eds.). (2013). Studies of laughter in interaction. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2007). Environmentally coupled gestures. In S. D. Duncan, J. Cassel, & E. T. Levy (Eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language (pp. 195–212). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2017). Co-operative Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., Goodwin, M. H., & Olsher, D. (2002). Producing sense with nonsense syllables: Turn and sequence in conversations with a man with severe aphasia. In C. E. Ford, B. A. Fox, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 56–80). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (1987). Children’s arguing. In S. Philips, S. Steele, & C. Tanz (Eds.), Language, gender, and sex in comparative perspective (pp. 200–248). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guaïtella, I., Santi, S., Lagrue, B., & Cavé, C. (2009). Are eyebrow movements linked to voice variations and turn-taking in dialogue? An experimental investigation. Language and Speech, 52(2–3), 207–222. doi:10.1177/0023830909103167
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heinemann, T., & Koivisto, A. (2016). Indicating a change-of-state in interaction: Cross-linguistic explorations. Journal of Pragmatics, 104, 83–88. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoey, E. M. (2014). Sighing in interaction: Somatic, semiotic, and social. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(2), 175–200. doi:10.1080/08351813.2014.900229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoey, E. M. (2020). Waiting to inhale: On sniffing in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 118–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstetter, E. (2020). Non-lexical ‘moans’: Response cries in board game interactions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 42–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kärkkäinen, E., & Thompson, S. A. (2018). Language and bodily resources: ‘Response packages’ in response to polar questions in English. Journal of Pragmatics, 123, 220–238. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2017.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaukomaa, T., Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. E. (2013). Turn-opening smiles: Facial expressions constructing emotional transition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 55, 21–42. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaukomaa, T., Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. E. (2014). Foreshadowing a problem: Turn-opening frowns in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 71, 132–147. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, P. A. (1988). Underspecification in phonetics. Phonology, 5(2), 275–292. doi:10.1017/S095267570000230X
   Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2013). The interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntax. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(1), 1–21. doi:10.1080/08351813.2013.753710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2014). Turn organization and bodily-vocal demonstrations. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 103–120. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2015). Coordinating the temporalities of talk and dance. In A. Deppermann & S. Günthner (Eds.), Temporality in Interaction (pp. 309–336). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2018). What does embodied interaction tell us about grammar? Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 1–23. doi:10.1080/08351813.2018.1413887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendrick, K. H., & Drew, P. (2016). Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krahmer, E., & Swerts, M. (2007). The effects of visual beats on prosodic prominence: Acoustic analyses, auditory perception and visual perception. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(3), 396–414. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd, D. R. (1978). Stylised intonation. Language, 54(3), 517–540. doi:10.1353/lan.1978.0056
   Google Scholar
• Laver, J. (1994). Principles of phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, T., & Cummins, F. (2011). The temporal relation between beat gestures and speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(10), 1457–1471. doi:10.1080/01690965.2010.500218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X. (2020). Click-initiated self-repair in changing the sequential trajectory of actions-in-progress. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 90–117.
   Google Scholar
• Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Local, J., & Kelly, J. (1986). Projection and silences: Notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies, 9(2–3), 185–204. doi:10.1007/BF00148126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loehr, D. (2007). Aspects of rhythm in gesture and speech. Gesture, 7(2), 179–214. doi:10.1075/gest.7.2
   Google Scholar
• Loehr, D. P. (2012). Temporal, structural, and pragmatic synchrony between intonation and gesture. Laboratory Phonology, 3, 71–89. doi:10.1515/lp-2012-0006
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and Thought. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2007). Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, 9(2), 195–226. doi:10.1177/1461445607075346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2016). Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(3), 336–366. doi:10.1111/josl.1_12177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2018). The multimodal interactional organization of tasting: Practices of tasting cheese in gourmet shops. Discourse Studies, 20(6), 743–769. doi:10.177/1461445618793439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2019). Contemporary issues in conversation analysis. Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 47–62. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2020). Audible sniffs: Smelling-in-interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 140–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, J., & Hayashi, M. (2006). The achievement of intersubjectivity through embodied completions: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers. Applied Linguistics, 27, 195–219. doi:10.1093/applin/aml014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevile, M. (2015). The embodied turn in research on language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(2), 121–151. doi:10.1080/08351813.2015.1025499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norén, K., & Linell, P. (2007). Meaning potentials and the interaction between lexis and grammar. Some empirical substantiations. Pragmatics, 17, 387–416. doi:10.1075/prag.17.3.03nor
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2013). Clicks and percussives in English conversation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 43(3), 299–320. doi:10.1017/S0025100313000224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2020). Audibly not saying something with clicks. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 66–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, R., Hakulinen, A., & Tainio, L. (2004). Indexing “no news” with stylization in finnish. Sound patterns in interaction. Cross-Linguistic Studies from Conversation, 62, 299.
   Google Scholar
• Pehkonen, S. (2020). Response cries inviting an alignment: Finnish huh huh. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 19–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (Eds.). (2012). Emotion in interaction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rauniomaa, M., & Keisanen, T. (2012). Two multimodal formats for responding to requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(6–7), 829–842. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, E. (2012). Affectivity in interaction: Sound objects in English. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Reber, E., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2020). On ‘whistle’ sound objects in English everyday conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 164–187.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vols. 1–2). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. doi:10.2307/412243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some gestures’ relation to talk. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 266–295). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Body torque. Social Research, 65(5), 536–596.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sorjonen, M.-L. (2001). Responding in conversation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M. (2013). Managing participation in interaction: The case of humming. Text & Talk, 33(1), 113–137. doi:10.1515/text-2013-0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Swerts, M., & Krahmer, E. (2008). Facial expression and prosodic prominence: Effects of modality and facial area. Journal of Phonetics, 36(2), 219–238. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2007.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G. (2017). Pitch and the projection of more talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(2), 206–225. doi:10.1080/08351813.2017.1301310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weatherall, A., Keevallik, L., & Stubbe, M. (2019, July 03–05). Being incapacitated by pain during medical consultations. Paper presented at IIEMCA, Mannheim University, Mannheim.
   Google Scholar
• Wharton, T. (2003). Interjections, language and the “showing’/’saying” continuum. Pragmatics & Cognition, 11, 39–91. doi:10.1075/pc.11.1.04wha
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S. (2002). Talking with your mouth full: Gustatory ‘mmm’s and the embodiment of pleasure. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35(3), 311–336. doi:10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S. (2013). The social life of ’Eugh’: Disgust as a form of evaluation in family mealtimes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(3), 489–509. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02106.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S. (2019). Moments of pleasure: A preliminary classification of gustatory mmms and the enactment of enjoyment during infant mealtimes. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (2006). Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(2), 150–182. doi:10.1177/019027250606900203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlodarczak, M., Heldner, M., & Edlund, J. (2015). Breathing in conversation: An unwritten history. In K. Jokinen & M. Vels (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd European and the 5th Nordic Symposium on Multimodal Communication (pp. 107–112). Linköping: Linköping University Press.
   Google Scholar