Nonlexical “Moans”: Response Cries in Board Game Interactions

References

• Aarsand, P. A., & Aronsson, K. (2009). Response cries and other gaming moves—Building intersubjectivity in gaming. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1557–1575. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (1972/2006). A theory of play and fantasy. In K. Salen & E. Zimmerman (Eds.), The game design reader: A rules of play anthology (pp. 314–328). London, UK: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2009). A sequential approach to affect: The case of disappointment. In M. Haakana, M. Laakso, & J. Lindström (Eds.), Talk in interaction: Comparative dimensions (pp. 94–123). Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Literature Society.
   Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M. (2018). Redrawing the margins of language: Lessons from research on ideophones. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), 1–30. doi:10.5334/gjgl.444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (1998). Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31(3–4), 295–325. doi:10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatigante, M., Liberati, V., & Pontecorvo, C. (2010). Transitions in and out of games: How parents and children bracket game episodes at home. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43(4), 346–371. doi:10.1080/08351813.2010.497631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, B., & Robles, J. (2010). It’s like mmm: Enactments with it’s like. Discourse Studies, 12(6), 715–738. doi:10.1177/1461445610381862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, B., & Thompson, S. (2010). Responses to Wh-questions in English conversation. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43(2), 133–156. doi:10.1080/08351811003751680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freese, & Maynard, D. (1998). Prosodic features of bad news and good news in conversation. Language in Society, 27(2), 195–219. doi:10.1017/S0047404500019850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn, P. (2003). Laughter in interaction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1978). Response cries. Language, 54(4), 787–815. doi:10.2307/413235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1996). Transparent vision. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 370–404). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative action. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. (1985). The serious side of jump rope: Conversational practices and social organization in the frame of play. The Journal of American Folklore, 98(389), 315–330. doi:10.2307/539938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., Goodwin, C., & Yaeger-Dror, M. (2002). Multi-modality in girls’ game disputes. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1621–1649. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00078-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, C. (1989). Pain talk: The expression of suffering in the medical consultation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52(2), 113–125. doi:10.2307/2786911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstetter, E. in press. Thinking with the body: Embodying thinking as a practice in board games. In S. Wiggins & K. Osvaldsson (Eds.), Discursive psychology and embodiment: Beyond subject-object boundaries, London, England: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstetter, E., & Robles, J. (2019). Manipulation in board game interactions: Being a sporting player. Symbolic Interaction, 42(2), 301–320. doi:10.1002/symb.2019.42.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, E. (2012). Using laugh responses to defuse complaints. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(4), 430–448. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.726886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, E. (2013). “There’s many a true word said in jest”: Seriousness and nonseriousness in interaction. In P. Glenn & E. Holt (Eds.), Studies of laughter in interaction (pp. 69–89). London, England: Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1984). On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 346–369). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, L., & Hepburn, A. (2015). Children’s sensations as interactional phenomena: A conversation analysis of children’s expressions of pain and discomfort. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(4), 472–491. doi:10.1080/14780887.2015.1054534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2012). Compromising progressivity: ‘No’-prefacing in Estonian. Pragmatics, 22(1), 119–146. doi:10.1075/prag.22.1.05kee
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2018, July). Strain grunts. Presented at the International Conference on Conversation Analysis, Loughborough, England.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick, K., & Drew, P. (2016). Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 49(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kockelman, P. (2003). The meanings of interjections in Q’eqchi’ Maya: From emotive reaction to social and discursive action. Current Anthropology, 44(4), 467–479. doi:10.1086/375871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H. (2002). Turn-sharing: The choral co-production of talk in interaction. In C. E. Ford, B. A. Fox, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 225–256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liberman, K. (2013). More Studies in Ethnomethodology. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Local, J. (1996). Conversational phonetics: Some aspects of news receipts in everyday talk. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies (pp. 177–230). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2012). Coordinating action and talk-in-interaction in and out of video games. In R. Ayuß & C. Gerhardt (Eds.), The appropriation of media in everyday life (pp. 231–270). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2010). Prosodic constructions in making complaints. In D. Barth-Weingarten, E. Reber, & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in interaction (pp. 81–104). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2013). Clicks and percussives in English conversation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 43(3), 299–320. doi:10.1017/S0025100313000224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2010). Putting aspiration into words: ‘Laugh particles’, managing descriptive trouble and modulating action. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1543–1555. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2009.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, E. (2012). Affectivity in interaction: Sound objects in English. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, S., Greiffenhagen, C., & Laurier, E. (2016). Video gaming as practical accomplishment: Ethnomethodology, conversation analysis, and play. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(2), 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2001). Getting serious: Joke –> serious ‘no’. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1947–1955. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00073-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selting, M. (2010). Affectivity in conversational storytelling: An analysis of displays of anger or indignation in complaint stories. Pragmatics, 20(2), 229–277. doi:10.1075/prag.20.2.06sel
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selting, M. (2017). The display and management of affectivity in climaxes of amusing stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 111, 1–32. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, C., Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2013). Having the last laugh: On post-completion laughter particles. In P. Glenn & E. Holt (Eds.), Studies of laughter in interaction (pp. 91–105). London, England: Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J., & Enfield, N. J. (2014). The ontology of action, in interaction. In N. Enfield, P. Kockelman, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology (pp. 423–446). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tekin, B. S., & Reeves, S. (2017, May). Ways of spectating: Unravelling spectator participation in Kinect play. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1558–1570). Denver, USA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Walker. (2013). Phonetics and prosody in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 455–474). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherall, A., Keevallik, L., & Stubbe, M. (2019, July). Being incapacitated by pain during medical consultations. Presented at the International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, Mannheim, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S. (2002). Talking with your mouth full: Gustatory Mmms and the embodiment of pleasure. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 35(3), 311–336. doi:10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S. (2013). The social life of ‘eugh’: Disgust as assessment in family mealtimes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(3), 489–509. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02106.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (2006). Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(2), 150–182. doi:10.1177/019027250606900203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar