Between Sound and Speech: Liminal Signs in Interaction

References

• Bailey, J. V. (2009). Could patients’ coughing have communicative significance? Communication & Medicine, 5(2), 105–115. doi:10.1558/cam.v5i2.105
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (1955). A theory of play and fantasy. Psychiatric Research Reports, 2(39), 39–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bolinger, D. L. (1946). Thoughts on ‘Yep’ and ‘Nope’. American Speech, 21(2), 90–95. doi: 10.2307/486479
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2006). Material Symbols. Philosophical Psychology, 19(3), 291–307. doi:10.1080/09515080600689872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73–111. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2009). A sequential approach to affect: The case of “disappointment”. In M. Haakana, M. Laakso, & J. Lindström (Eds.), Talk in interaction-comparative dimensions (pp. 94–123). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
   Google Scholar
• Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London, England: J. Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Di Paolo, E. A., Cuffari, E. C., & De Jaegher, H. (2018). Linguistic bodies: The continuity between life and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M. (2017). On the margins of language: Ideophones, interjections and dependencies in linguistic theory. In N. J. Enfield (Ed.), Dependencies in language (pp. 195–202). Berlin, Germany: Language Science Press. doi:10.5281/zenodo.573781
   Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M. (2020). Resource-rationality beyond individual minds: The case of interactive language use. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22–23. doi:10.1017/S0140525X19001638
   Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J. (2013). Relationship thinking: Agency, enchrony, and human sociality. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J. (2014). Natural causes of language: Frames, biases and cultural transmission. Berlin, Germany: Language Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fries, C. C., & Pike, K. L. (1949). Coexistent phonemic systems. Language, 25(1), 29–50. doi:10.2307/409907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, C. D. (2012). The role of metacognition in human social interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1599), 2213–2223. doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1986). On formal structures of practical actions. In H. Garfinkel (Ed.), Ethnomethodological studies of work (pp. 157). London, England: Routledge & K. Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Gil, D. (2013). Para-Linguistic usages of clicks. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Retrieved from http://wals.info/chapter/142
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places; notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York, NY: Free Press of Glencoe.
   Google Scholar
• Hoey, E. M. (2014). Sighing in interaction: Somatic, semiotic, and social. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 47(2), 175–200. doi:10.1080/08351813.2014.900229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoey, E. M. (2017). Sequence recompletion: A practice for managing lapses in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 109, 47–63. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoey, E. M. (2020). Waiting to inhale: On sniffing in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction , 53(1), 118–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstetter, E. (2020). Non-lexical ‘moans’: Response cries in board game interactions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 42–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaegher, H. D., Peräkylä, A., & Stevanovic, M. (2016). The co-creation of meaningful action: Bridging enaction and interactional sociology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 371(1693), 20150378. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1973). A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica, 9(1), 47–96. doi:10.1515/semi.1973.9.1.47
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1985). An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 3, pp. 25–34). London, England: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2018). What does embodied interaction tell us about grammar? Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 1–21. doi:10.1080/08351813.2018.1413887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X. (2020). Click-initiated self-repair in changing the sequential trajectory of actions-in-progress. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 90–117.
   Google Scholar
• McHoul, A. (2005). Aspects of aspects: On Harvey Sacks’s “missing” book, aspects of the sequential organization of conversation (1970). Human Studies, 28(2), 113–128. doi:10.1007/s10746-005-4188-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesch, J. (2016). Manual backchannel responses in signers’ conversations in Swedish Sign Language. Language & Communication, 50, 22–41. doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2016.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2006). La compétence comme dimension située et contingente, localement évaluée par les participants. Bulletin VALS-ASLA, 84, 83–119.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2016). Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(3), 336–366. doi:10.1111/josl.1_12177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2020). Audible sniffs: Smelling-in-interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 140–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2012). Making sense of outliers. Phonetica, 69(1–2), 48–67. doi:10.1159/000343197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2013). Clicks and percussives in English conversation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 43(3), 299–320. doi:10.1017/S0025100313000224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2015). Data always invite us to listen again: Arguments for mixing our methods. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(3), 271–275. doi:10.1080/08351813.2015.1058601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2020). Audibly not saying something with clicks. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 66–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pehkonen, S. (2020). Response cries inviting and alignment: Finnish huh huh. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 19–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillion, B., Grenoble, L. A., Ngué Um, E., & Kopper, S. (2019). Verbal gestures in Cameroon. In E. Clem, P. Jenks, & H. Sande (Eds.), Theory and description in African Linguistics (pp. 303–322). Berlin, Germany: Language Science Press. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3367128
   Google Scholar
• Reber, E. (2012). Affectivity in interaction: Sound objects in English. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Reber, E., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2020). On ‘whistle’ sound objects in English everyday conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 164–187.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1985). The inference-making machine: Notes on observability. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 3, pp. 13–23). London, England: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1989). Lecture four: An impromptu survey of the literature. Human Studies, 12(3/4), 253–259.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (pp. 1–2). London, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sapir, E. (1921). Language. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 150–171). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J., & Enfield, N. J. (2012). Language diversity and social action. Current Anthropology, 53(3), 302–333. doi:10.1086/665697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverstein, M. (1981). The limits of awareness. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Torreira, F., Bögels, S., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Breathing for answering: The time course of response planning in conversation. Language Sciences, 6, 284. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00284
   Google Scholar
• Turner, V. (1969). Liminality and communitas. In The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure (Vol. 94, pp.94–130). Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, B., & Grawunder, S. (2012). The phonetic profile of Korean formal and informal speech registers. Journal of Phonetics, 40(6), 808–815. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2012.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woensdregt, M., & Smith, K. (2017). Pragmatics and language evolution. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.321
   Google Scholar