Audible Sniffs: Smelling-in-Interaction

References

• Broth, M. (2011). The theatre performance as interaction between actors and their audience. Nottingham French Studies, 50(2), 113–133. doi:10.3366/nfs.2011-2.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrea, C., Valentin, D., Sulmont-Rossé, C., Ly Mai, H., Hoang Nguyen, D., & Abdi, H. (2004). Culture and odor categorization: Agreement between cultures depends upon the odors. Food Quality and Preference, 15(7−8), 669−679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Classen, C., Howes, D., & Synnott, A. (1994). Aroma: The cultural history of smell. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, A. (1986). The foul and the fragrant: Odor and the French social imagination. New York, NY: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Drobnick, J. (2006). The smell culture reader. New York, NY: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Fele, G. (2016). Il Paradosso del Gusto. Società Mutamento Politica, 7(14), 151−174.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1962). Observations on active touch. Psychological Review, 69, 477−491. doi:10.1037/h0046962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1978). Response cries. Language, 54(4), 787−815. doi:10.2307/413235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfried, J. A. (2010). Central mechanisms of odour object perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(9), 628–641. doi:10.1038/nrn2883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepburn, A. (2004). Crying: Notes on description, transcription, and interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37, 251–290. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3703_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 15–38. doi:10.1177/019027250506800103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoey, E. M. (2014). Sighing in interaction: Somatic, semiotic, and social. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(2), 175–200. doi:10.1080/08351813.2014.900229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoey, E. M. (2020). Waiting to inhale: On sniffing in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 118–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1984). Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset. In V. D’Urso & P. Leonardi (Eds.), Discourse analysis and natural rhetoric (pp. 11−38). Padua, Italy: Cleup.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1985). An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 3, pp. 25−34). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2010). Sometimes a frog in your throat is just a frog in your throat: Gutturals as (sometimes) laughter-implicative. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6), 1476–1484. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2013). The interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntax. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(1), 1–21. doi:10.1080/08351813.2013.753710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2018). What does embodied interaction tell us about grammar? Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 1–23. doi:10.1080/08351813.2018.1413887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, K. (2013). The phenomenology of coffee tasting. In More studies in ethnomethodology. New York, NY: SUNY.
   Google Scholar
• Local, J., & Kelly, J. (1986). Projection and ‘silences’: Notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies, 9(2), 185–204. doi:10.1007/BF00148126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majid, A., & Burenhuit, N. (2014). Odors are expressible in language, as long as you speak the right language. Cognition, 130(2), 266−270. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2016). Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(2), 336−366. doi:10.1111/josl.1_12177
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2018a). The multimodal interactional organization of tasting: Practices of tasting cheese in gourmet shops. Discourse Studies, 20(6), 743–769. doi:10.1177/1461445618793439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2018b). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85−106. doi:10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2019a). Contemporary issues in conversation analysis. Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 47−62. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2019b). Rethinking bodies and objects in social interaction: A multimodal and multisensorial approach to tasting. In U. Tikvah Kissmann & J. van Loon (Eds.), Discussing new materialism (pp. 109–134). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2013). Clicks and percussives in English conversation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 43(3), 299–320. doi:10.1017/S0025100313000224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2020). Audibly not saying something with clicks. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 66–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 57−101). Cambridge, England: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Reber, E. (2012). Affectivity in interaction: Sound objects in English. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Rouby, C., Schaal, B., Dubois, D., Gervais, R., & Holley, A. (2002). Olfaction, taste, and cognition. Cambridge, England: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Turn Organization: One interaction of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammar and interaction (pp. 52–133). Cambridge, England: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29(1), 1−63. doi:10.1017/S0047404500001019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S., & Potter, J. (2003). Attitudes and evaluative practices: Category vs. item and subjective vs. objective constructions in everyday food assessments. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(4), 513−531. doi:10.1348/014466603322595257
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wnuk, E., & Majid, A. (2014). Revisiting the limits of language: The odor lexicon of Maniq. Cognition, 131, 125−138. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar