References
- Antaki, C. (2012). Affiliative and disaffiliative candidate understandings. Discourse Studies, 14(5), 531–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612454074
- Asmuß, B. (2011). Proposing shared knowledge as a means of pursuing agreement. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), Studies in interactional sociolinguistics: V. 29. The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 207–234). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.010
- Auer, P., & Lindström, J. (2016). Left/right asymmetries and the grammar of pre- vs. post-positioning in German and Swedish talk-in-interaction. Language Sciences, 56, 68–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.03.001
- Barth-Weingarten, D. (2011). Double sayings of German JA —More observations on their phonetic form and alignment function. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 44(2), 157–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2011.567099
- Benjamin, T. (2012). When problems pass us by: Using “you mean” to help locate the source of trouble. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(1), 82–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646742
- Betz, E. (2017). Diskursmarker aus konversationsanalytischer Sicht: Prosodisch integriertes jaam Beginn von responsiven Turns. In H. Blühdorn, A. Deppermann, H. Helmer, & T. Spranz-Fogasy (Eds.), Diskursmarker im Deutschen: Reflexionen und Analysen (pp. 183–205). Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.
- Bickel, B., Comrie, B., & Haspelmath, M. (2008). The Leipzig glossing rules. Conventions for interlinear morpheme-by-morpheme glosses. https://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/pdf/Glossing-Rules.pdf
- Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2020). Praat (Version 6.1.16) [ Computer software].
- Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (2018). Interactional linguistics: Studying language in social interaction. Cambridge University Press.
- Curl, T. S., & Drew, P. (2008). Contingency and action. A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(2), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028613
- Dehé, N., & Wichmann, A. (2010). Sentence-initial I think (that) and I believe (that): Prosodic evidence for uses as main clause, comment clause and discourse marker. Studies in Language, 34(1), 36–74. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.34.1.02deh
- Deppermann, A. (2009). Verstehensdefizit als Antwortverpflichtung: Interaktionale Eigenschaften der Modalpartikel denn in Fragen. In J. Bücker & S. Günther (Eds.), Linguistik, Impulse & Tendenzen: Vol. 33. Grammatik im Gespräch: Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung (pp. 23–56). W. de Gruyter.
- Deppermann, A. (2012). Über Sätze in Gesprächsbeiträgen - wann sie beginnen und wann man sie braucht. In C. Cortès (Ed.), Satzeröffnung: Formen, Funktionen, Strategien (pp. 1–14). Tübingen.
- Deppermann, A., & Reineke, S. (2017). Epistemische Praktiken und ihre feinen Unterschiede: Verwendungen von ‘ich dachte’ in gesprochener Sprache. In A. Deppermann, N. Proske, & A. Zeschel (Eds.), Studien zur deutschen Sprache: Band 74. Verben im interaktiven Kontext: Bewegungsverben und mentale Verben im gesprochenen Deutsch (pp. 337–375). Narr Francke Attempto.
- Dingemanse, M., & Floyd, S. (2014). Conversation across cultures. In N. J. Enfield, P. Kockelman, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Cambridge handbooks in language and linguistics. The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology (1st ed., pp. 447–480). Cambridge University Press.
- Drew, P. (1997). ‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 28(1), 69–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)89759-7
- Drew, P. (2003). Comparative analysis of talk-in-interaction in different institutional settings: A sketch. In P. J. Glenn, C. D. LeBaron, & J. Mandelbaum (Eds.), Studies in language and social interaction (pp. 293–308). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Egbert, M. (2009). Der Reparatur-Mechanismus in deutschen Gesprächen. Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.
- Enfield, N. J., & Sidnell, J. (2017). The concept of action. New departures in anthropology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139025928
- Falke, S., Hansen-Morath, S., & Wolfer, S. (2020). KoGra-R 2.0: Standardisierte statistische Verfahren für korpusbasierte Häufigkeiten. 2. überarbeitete Version. http://kograno.ids-mannheim.de/
- Fox Tree, J. E., & Schrock, J. C. (2002). Basic meanings of you know and I mean. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(6), 727–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00027-9
- Golato, A. (2010). Marking understanding versus receipting information in talk: Achso. and ach in German interaction. Discourse Studies, 12(2), 147–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609356497
- Golato, A., & Betz, E. (2008). German ach and achso in repair uptake: Resources to sustain or remove epistemic asymmetry. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 27(1), 7–37. https://doi.org/10.1515/ZFSW.2008.002
- Goldberg, J. A. (1978). Amplitude shift: A mechanism for the affiliation of utterances in conversational interaction. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 199–218). Elsevier.
- Haspelmath, M. (2003). The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (Vol. 2, pp. 211–242). Lawrence Erlabum.
- Haspelmath, M. (2010). Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language, 86(3), 663–687. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0021
- Helmer, H., & Zinken, J. (2019). Das Heißt (“that means”) for formulations and Du Meinst (“you mean”) for repair? Interpretations of prior speakers’ turns in German. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 52(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1608098
- Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity Press.
- Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
- Imo, W. (2007). Construction Grammar und Gesprochene-Sprache-Forschung. de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110975895
- Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). John Benjamins Publishing Co.
- Kärkkäinen, E. (2003). Epistemic stance in English conversation: A description of its interactional functions, with a focus on I think. Pragmatics & beyond: N.S., 115. Benjamins.
- Kärkkäinen, E. (2012). I thought it was very interesting. Conversational formats for taking a stance. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(15), 2194–2210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.005
- Keevallik, L. (2010). Minimal answers to yes/no questions in the service of sequence organization. Discourse Studies, 12(3), 283–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445610363951
- Kendrick, K. H. (2015). Other-initiated repair in English. Open Linguistics, 1(1), 244. https://doi.org/10.2478/opli-2014-0009
- Lee, S. ‑. H., & Tanaka, H. (2016). Affiliation and alignment in responding actions. Journal of Pragmatics, 100, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.05.008
- Levinson, S. C. (2013). Action formation and ascription. In T. Stivers & J. Sidnell (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 103–130). Wiey-Blackwell.
- Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Works of george Herbert Mead. University of Chicago Press.
- Oloff, F. (2017). Genau als redebeitragsinterne, responsive, sequenzschließende oder sequenzstrukturierende Bestätigungspartikel im Gespräch. In H. Blühdorn, A. Deppermann, H. Helmer, & T. Spranz-Fogasy (Eds.), Diskursmarker im Deutschen: Reflexionen und Analysen (pp. 207–232). Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.
- Pomerantz, A. (1988). Offering a candidate answer: An information seeking strategy. Communication Monographs, 55(4), 360–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758809376177
- Rauniomaa, M., & Keisanen, T. (2012). Two multimodal formats for responding to requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(6–7), 829–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.003
- Raymond, C. W., & Stivers, T. (2016). The Omnirelevance of accountability: Off-record account solicitations. In J. D. Robinson (Ed.), Foundations of human interaction: Accountability in social interaction (pp. 321–353). Oxford University Press.
- Raymond, G. (2010). Grammar and social relations: Alternative forms of yes/no-type initiating actions in health visitor interactions. In A. F. Freed & S. L. Ehrlich (Eds.), Oxford scholarship online. “Why do you ask?”: The function of questions in institutional discourse (pp. 87–107). Oxford University Press.. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306897.003.0005
- Robinson, J. D. (2016). Accountability in social interaction. In J. D. Robinson (Ed.), Foundations of human interaction: Accountability in social interaction (pp. 1–44). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210557.003.0001
- Rossi, G. (2012). Bilateral and unilateral requests: The use of imperatives and Mi X? Interrogatives in Italian. Discourse Processes, 49(5), 426–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2012.684136
- Rossi, G., Floyd, S., Baranova, J., Blythe, J., Dingemanse, M., Kendrick, K. H., Zinken, J., & Enfield, N. J…. (in prep.). Grammar is shaped by universal pragmatics: Evidence from requests in eight languages.
- Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243
- Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1295–1345. https://doi.org/10.1086/229903
- Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52–133). Cambridge University Press.
- Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208
- Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361. https://doi.org/10.2307/413107
- Selting, M. (1987). Reparaturen und lokale Verstehensprobleme oder: Zur Binnenstruktur von Reparatursequenzen. Linguistische Berichte, 108, 128–149. https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/opus4-ubp/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/3993/file/reparaturen_1987.pdf
- Seuren, L. M., & Huiskes, M. (2017). Confirmation or elaboration: What do yes/no declaratives want? Research on Language & Social Interaction, 50(2), 188–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1301307
- Sidnell, J. (2017). Action in interaction is conduct under a description. Language in Society, 46(3), 313–337. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404517000173
- Spranz-Fogasy, T. (2010). Verstehensdokumentation in der medizinischen Kommunikation: Fragen und Antworten im Arzt-Patient-Gespräch. In A. Deppermann, U. Reitemeier, R. Schmitt, & T. Spranz-Fogasy (Eds.), Verstehen in professionellen Handlungsfeldern (pp. 27–116). Narr Francke Attempto.
- Steensig, J. (2013). Conversation analysis and affiliation and alignment. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (Vol. 27, pp. 1–6). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0196.pub2
- Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123
- Stivers, T., Mondada, L., & Steensig, J. (2011). Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), Studies in interactional sociolinguistics: Vol. 29. The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 3–24). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.002
- Thompson, S. A., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2005). The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 481–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054403
- Thompson, S. A., & Mulac, A. (1991). The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics, 15(3), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90012-M
- Watson, R. D. (2008). Comparative sociology, laic and analytic: Some critical remarks on comparison in conversation analysis. Cahiers De Praxématique, 50, 197–238. https://doi.org/10.4000/praxematique.967
- Weatherall, A., & Keevallik, L. (2016). When claims of understanding are less than affiliative. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 49(3), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1196544
- Zhan, K., Wei, W., Searles, D., Potter, J., Park, S. H., Mikesell, L., Mandelbaum, J., Hepburn, A., & Bolden, G…. (2018). Gratitude in recruitment sequences. 5th International Conference on Conversation Analysis, Loughborough, UK..
- Zinken, J., & Kaiser, J. (in press). Formulating other minds in social interaction: Accountability and courses of action. Language in Society.