Longitudinal Conversation Analysis - Introduction to the Special Issue

References

• Beach, W. A. (2009). A natural history of family cancer: Interactional resources for managing illness. Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bercelli, F., Rossano, F., & Viaro, M. (2013). Supra-session courses of action in psychotherapy. Journal of Pragmatics, 57, 118–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J., & Luckmann, T. (1995). Reconstructive genres of everyday communication. In U. Qustoff (Ed.), Aspects of oral communication (pp. 289–304). de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bilmes, J. (1985). “Why that now?” Two kinds of conversational meaning. Discourse Processes, 8(3), 319–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538509544620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broth, M. (2017). Starting out as a driver: Progression in instructed pedal work. In Å. Mäkitalo, P. Linell, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Memory practices and learning: Interactional, institutional and sociocultural perspectives (pp. 115–152). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, C. E., & Wagner, J. (2004). Developmental issues in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.1.1.29.55873
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cekaite, A. (2007). A child’s development of interactional competence in a Swedish L2 classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00509.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1996). Communities, commonalities, and communication. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 324–355). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(86)90010-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayman, S. E., & Heritage, J. (2002). Questioning Presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of U.S. Presidents Eisenhower and Reagan. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 749–775. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02572.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayman, S. E., & Heritage, J. (2021/this issue). Conversation analysis and the study of sociohistorical change. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(2), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899717
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2011). Grammaticalization and conversation. In H. Narrog & B. Heine (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 424–437). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2021). Language over time: Some old and new uses of OKAY in American English. Interactional Linguistics, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1075/il.20008.cou
   Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A. (2018). Changes in turn-design over interactional histories - the case of instructions in driving school lessons. In A. Deppermann & J. Streeck (Eds.), Time in embodied interaction. Synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources (pp. 293–324). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A., & Mondada, L. (2021). Data and methods used in the study of OKAY across languages. In E. Betz, A. Deppermann, L. Mondada, & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Okay across languages: Toward a comparative approach to its use in talk-in-interaction (pp. 29–51). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A., & Schmidt, A. ( 2021/this issue). How shared meanings and uses emerge over an interactional history: Wabi sabi in a series of theatre rehearsals. Research on Languge and Social Interaction, 54(2), 203–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899714
   Google Scholar
• Divjak, D. (2019). Frequency in language: Memory, attention and learning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eskildsen, S. W., & Wagner, J. (2013). Recurring and shared gestures in the L2 classroom: Resources for teaching and learning. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2013-0007
   Google Scholar
• Eskildsen, S. W., & Wagner, J. (2015). Embodied L2 construction learning. Language Learning, 65(2), 419–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filipi, A. (2009). Parent and toddler interaction: The development of interactional competence through pointing, gaze and vocalisations. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Filipi, A. (2015). The development of recipient-design in bilingual parent-child interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(1), 100–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.993858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firth, A. (1996). The discursive accomplishment of normality: On ‘lingua franca’ English and conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(2), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(96)00014-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05480.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, M. A. (2008). The emergence of self-repair: A case study of one child during the early preschool years. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1964). Studies in the routine grounds of everyday activities. Social Problems, 11(3), 225–250. https://doi.org/10.2307/798722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. D. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology (pp. 337–366). Appleton Century Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative action. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., Goodwin, M. H., & Olsher, D. (2002). Producing sense with nonsense syllables: Turn and sequence in the conversation of a man with severe aphasia. In B. Fox, C. Ford, & S. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 56–80). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harjunpää, K., Deppermann, A., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (2021). Constructing the Chekhovian inner body in instructions: An interactional history of factuality and agentivity. Journal of Pragmatics, 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.034
   Google Scholar
• Hausendorf, H., & Quasthoff, U. M. (1996). Sprachentwicklung und Interaktion: Eine linguistische Studie zum Erwerb von Diskursfähigkeiten bei Kindern. Westdeutscher.
   Google Scholar
• Hazel, S. (2017). Mapping the landscape – Developing multilingual norms in a transient project community. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 27(3), 308–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12167
   Google Scholar
• Hazel, S. (2018). Discovering interactional authenticity: Tracking theatre practitioners across rehearsals. In S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Wagner, & E. Gonzalez-Martinez (Eds.), Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction (pp. 255–283). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hellermann, J. (2008). Social actions for classroom language learning. Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Hellermann, J. (2011). Members’ methods, members competencies: Looking for evidence of language learning in longitudinal investigation of other-initiated repair. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 147–172). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. (2013). The changing tenor of questioning over time: Tracking a question form across us presidential news conferences, 1953-2000. Journalism Practice, 7(4), 481–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.802485
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, G., & Wagner, J. (2014). Conversation analysis in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 171–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. (2009). The Korean discourse markers -nuntey and kuntey in native-nonnative conversation. In H. T. Nguyen & G. Kasper (Eds.), Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspectives (pp. 317–350). University of Hawai, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, R. (1986). Zur linguistischen Synergetik. Struktur und Dynamik der Lexik. Brockmeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Koschmann, T. (2013). Conversation analysis and learning in interaction. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1038–1043). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kurhila, S. (2006). Second language interaction. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. University of Cambridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luff, P., Heath, C., Kuzuoka, H., Hindmarsh , J., Yamazaki, K. & Oyama, S. (2003). Fractured ecologies: Creating environments for collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction, 18(1), 51–84. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1812_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markee, N., & Kasper, G. (2004). Classroom talks. An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 491–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-14-.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C., & Sahlström, F. (2010). Learning as longitudinal interactional change: From other-repair to self-repair in physiotherapy treatment. Discourse Processes, 47(8), 668–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638531003628965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2018). Controversial issues in participatory urban planning: An ethnomethodological and conversation analytic historical study. In S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Wagner, & E. González-Martínez (Eds.), Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction (pp. 287–328). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, J. (2017). Transient multilingual communities as a field of investigation: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 27(3), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. T. (2011). Achieving recipient design longitudinally: Evidence from a pharmacy intern in patient consultations. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 173–205). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. T. (2019). Developing interactional competence in a lingua franca at the workplace: An ethnomethodologically endogenous account. In H. T. Nguyen & T. Malabarba (Eds.), Conversation analytic perspectives on English language learning, teaching and testing in global contexts (pp. 59–84). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Norén, K., & Linell, P. (2007). Meaning potentials and the interaction between Lexis and Contexts: An empirical substantiation. Pragmatics, 17(3), 387–416. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17.3.03nor
   Google Scholar
• Norrthon, S. (2019). To stage an overlap – The longitudinal, collaborative and embodied process of staging eight lines in a professional theatre rehearsal process. Journal of Pragmatics, 142, 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. (Eds.). (1979). Studies in developmental pragmatics. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S. ( in press). How grammar grows out of social interaction: From multi-unit to single unit question. Open Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S. (2018). Elaborations on L2 interactional competence: The development of L2 grammar-for-interaction. Classroom Discourse, 9(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1437759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S., & Balaman, U. ( 2021/this issue). The routinization of grammar as a social action format: A longitudinal study of video-mediated interactions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899710
   Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S., & Berger, E. (2018). L2 interactional competence as increased ability for context-sensitive conduct: A longitudinal study of story-openings. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2011). Developing “methods” for interaction: Disagreement sequences in French L2. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 206–243). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S., Wagner, J., & González-Martínez, E. (Eds.). (2018). Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, M., & Anna, M. ( 2021/this issue). Recruiting assistance in early childhood: Longitudinal changes in the use of ‘oh+X’ as a way of reporting trouble in German. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(2), 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899708
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 75–119). Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1989). Reflections on language, development, and the interactional character of talk-in-interaction. In M. H. Bornstein & J. S. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in human development (pp. 139–154). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1992). On talk and its institutional occasions. In J. Heritage & P. Drews (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 101–134). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2009). One perspective on conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives. In J. Sidnell (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives (pp. 357–406). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, H.-J. (2020). The dynamics of the linguistic system. Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, A., & Deppermann, A. (2020). Interaktive Emergenz und Stabilisierung – Zur Entstehung kollektiver Kreativität in Theaterproben. In J. Reichertz (Ed.), Grenzen der Kommunikation – Kommunikation an den Grenzen (pp. 182–201). Velbrück.
   Google Scholar
• Schütz, A. (1960 [1932]). Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt: Eine Einleitung in die verstehende Soziologie. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. (Ed.). (2009). Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skogmyr Marian, K. ( 2021/this issue). Initiating a complaint: Change over time in French L2 speakers’ practices. Research on Language and Social Interaction., 54(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899709.
   Google Scholar
• Skogmyr Marian, K., & Balaman, U. (2018). Second language interactional competence and its development: An overview of conversation analytic research on interactional change over time. Language and Linguistics Compass, 12(8), e12285. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Rossano, F., De Ruiter, J. P., Yoon, K.-E., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(26), 10587–10592. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903616106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Sidnell, J., & Bergen, C. (2018). Children’s responses to questions in peer interactions. A window into the ontogenesis of interactional competence. Journal of Pragmatics, 124, 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svennevig, J. (2018). Decomposing turns to enhance understanding by L2 speakers. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(4), 398–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1524575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based approach to child language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voutilainen, L., Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2011). Therapeutic change in interaction: Conversation analysis of a transforming sequence. Psychotherapy Research, 21(3), 348–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2011.573509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voutilainen, L., Rossano, F., & Peräkylä, A. (2018). Conversation analysis and psychotherapeutic change. In S. Pekarek Doehler, E. González-Martínez, & J. Wagner (Eds.), Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction (pp. 225–254). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, J., Pekarek Doehler, S., & González-Martínez, E. (2018). Longitudinal research on the organization of social interaction: Current developments and methodological challenges. In S. Pekarek Doehler, E. González-Martínez, & J. Wagner (Eds.), Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction (pp. 3–35). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wakin, M. A., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1999). Reduction and specialization in emergency and directory assistance calls. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(4), 409–437. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973rls3204_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., Gower, M., Beeke, S., & Maxim, J. (2007). Adapting to conversation as a language-impaired speaker: Changes in aphasic turn construction over time. Communication & Medicine, 4(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1515/CAM.2007.009
   Google Scholar
• Wootton, A. J. (1997). Interaction and the development of mind. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, D. H. (1999). Horizontal and vertical comparative research in language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(1–2), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1999.9683623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar