The Routinization of Grammar as a Social Action Format: A Longitudinal Study of Video-Mediated Interactions

References

• Aijmer, K. (1996). Conversational routines in English: Convention and creativity. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Arminen, I., Licoppe, C., & Spagnolli, A. (2016). Respecifying mediated interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(4), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1234614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaman, U. (2018). Task-induced development of hinting behaviors in online L2 task-oriented interaction. Language Learning & Technology, 22(2), 95–115. https://doi.org/10125/44640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaman, U. (2019). Sequential organization of hinting in online task-oriented L2 interaction. Text & Talk, 39(4), 511–534. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2019-2038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaman, U., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (in press). Navigating the complex social ecology of screen-based activity in video-mediated interaction. Pragmatics.
   Google Scholar
• Balaman, U., & Sert, O. (2017a). Development of L2 interactional resources for online collaborative task accomplishment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(7), 601–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1334667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaman, U., & Sert, O. (2017b). The coordination of online L2 interaction and orientations to task interface for epistemic progression. Journal of Pragmatics, 115, 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, J., & Hopper, P. J. (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Marshall, C. R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. K. Joshi, B. L. Webber, & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10–63). CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (2018). Interactional linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Depperman, A., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2021/this issue). Longitudinal conversation analysis - introduction to the special issue. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899707
   Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A. (2018). Changes in turn-design over interactional histories: The case of instructions in driving school lessons. In A. Deppermann & J. Streeck (Eds.), Time in embodied interaction: Synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources (pp. 293–324). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A., & Schmidt, A. (2021/this issue). How shared meanings and uses emerge over an interactional history: Wabi sabi in a series of theatre rehearsals. Research on Langauge and Social Interaction, 54(2), 203–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899714
   Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A., & Streeck, J. (Eds.). (2018). Time in embodied interaction: Synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. (2012). Frequency-based accounts of second language acquisition. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 193–210). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eskildsen, S. W. (2011). The L2 inventory in action: Conversation analysis and usage-based linguistics in SLA. In G. Pallotti & J. Wagner (Eds.), L2 learning as social practice: Conversation analytic perspectives (pp. 327–364). National Foreign Language Resource Center.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, B. (2007). Principles shaping grammatical practices: An exploration. Discourse Studies, 9(3), 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607076201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative action. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haddington, P., Keisanen, T., Mondada, L., & Neville, M. (Eds.). (2014). Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking. John Benamins.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1993). Disembodied conduct: Interactional asymmetries in video-mediated communication. In G. Button (Ed.), Technology in working order: Studies of work, interaction, and technology (pp. 35–54). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., & Luff, P. (eds.). (2000). Technology in action. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2007). Intersubjectivity and progressivity in person (and place) reference. In N. J. Enfield & T. Stivers (Eds.), Person reference in interaction (pp. 255–280). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hjulstad, J. (2016). Practices of organizing built space in videoconference-mediated interactions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(4), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1199087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoey, E. (2020). Self-authorizing action: On let me X in English social interaction. Language in Society, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404520000779
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, P. J. (2011). Emergent grammar and temporality in interactional linguistics. In P. Auer & S. Pfänder (Eds.), Constructions: Emerging and emergent (pp. 22–44). Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Licoppe, C., & Morel, J. (2012). Video-in-interaction: “Talking heads” and the multimodal organization of mobile and Skype video calls. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(4), 399–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.724996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licoppe, C., & Morel, J. (2014). Mundane video directors in interaction: Showing one’s environment in Skype and mobile video calls. In M. Broth, E. Laurier, & L. Mondada (Eds.), Studies of video practices (pp. 143–168). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Luff, P., Heath, C., Kuzuoka, H., Hindmarsh, J., Yamazaki, K., & Oyama, S. (2003). Fractured ecologies: Creating environments for collaboration. Human Computer Interaction, 18(1–2), 51–84. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1812_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luff, P., Heath, C., Yamashita, N., Kuzuoka, H., & Jirotka, M. (2016). Embedded reference: Translocating gestures in video-mediated interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(4), 342–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1199088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2014). The temporal orders of multiactivity. Operating and demonstrating in the surgical theatre. In P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada, & M. Neville (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 33–75). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Näslund, S. (2016). Tacit tango: The social framework of screen-focused silence in institutional telephone calls. Journal of Pragmatics, 91, 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. A. (eds.). (1996). Interaction and grammar. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S. (2018). Elaborations on L2 interactional competence: The development of L2 grammar-for-interaction. Classroom Discourse, 9(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1437759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S. (in press). How grammar grows out of social interaction: From multi-unit to single unit question. Open Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S., & Berger, E. (2018). L2 interactional competence as increased ability for context-sensitive conduct: A longitudinal study of story-openings. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2015). The development of L2 interactional competence: Evidence from turn-taking organization, sequence organization, repair organization and preference organization. In T. Cadierno & S. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 233–268). Mouton De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S., Wagner, J., & González-Martínez, E. (eds.). (2018). Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rintel, S. (2013). Video calling in long-distance relationships: The opportunistic use of audio/video distortions as a relational resource. The Electronic Journal of Communication/La Revue Electronic de Communication, 23(1&2), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 15–21). Irvington Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1989). Reflections on language, development, and the interactional character of talk-in-interaction. In M. H. Bornstein & J. S. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in human development (pp. 139–153).  Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52–133). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. A primer in conversation analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skogmyr Marian, K. (2021/this issue). Initiating a complaint: Change over time in French L2 speakers’ practices. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899709
   Google Scholar
• Skogmyr Marian, K., & Balaman, U. (2018). L2 interactional competence and its development: An overview of conversation analytic research on interactional change over time. Language and Linguistics Compass, 12(8), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M. (2018). Social deontics: A nano-level approach to human power play. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 48(3), 369–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. (2004). “No no no” and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction. Human Communication Research, 30(2), 260–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00733.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, S. A., Fox, B. A., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2015). Grammar in everyday talk: Building responsive actions. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based approach to child language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, J., Pekarek Doehler, S., & González-Martínez, E. (2018). Longitudinal research on the organization of social interaction: Current developments and methodological challenges. In S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Wagner&, & E. González-Martínez (Eds.), Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction (pp. 3–35). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• West, C. (1990). Not just doctors’ orders: Directive-response sequences in patients’ visits to women and men physicians. Discourse & Society, 1(1), 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926590001001005
   Google Scholar
• Whalen, J., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1998). Observations on the display and management of emotion in naturally occurring activities: The case of” hysteria” in calls to 9-1-1. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wootton, A. J. (1997). Interaction and the development of mind. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar