1,027
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Conversation Analysis and the Study of Sociohistorical Change

&

References

  • Asmuß, B., & Svennevig, J. (2009). Meeting talk: An introduction. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 46(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943608326761
  • Atkinson, J. M. (1982). Understanding formality: The categorization and production of ‘formal’ interaction. The British Journal of Sociology, 33(1), 86–117. https://doi.org/10.2307/589338
  • Banning, S., & Billingsley, S. (2007). Journalist aggressiveness in joint versus solo presidential press conferences. Mass Communication & Society. 10. 461–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430701580672
  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
  • Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Harvard University Press.
  • Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2004). Constructing variables. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 17–34). Sage.
  • Bulmer, M. (2001). Social measurement: What stands in its way? Social Research, 68(2), 455–480. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40971466
  • Bybee, J. (2003). Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In B. D. Joseph & J. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 602–623). Blackwell.
  • Chang, H. (2004). Inventing temperature: Measurement and scientific progress. Oxford University Press.
  • Cillizza, C. (2015, March 25). How the seating chart of the white house press room has changed, in 1 cool graphic. The Washington Post.
  • Clayman, S. E. (2017). The micropolitics of legitimacy: Political position-taking and journalistic scrutiny at the boundary of the mainstream. Social Psychology Quarterly, 80(1), 41–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272516667705
  • Clayman, S. E., Elliott, M. H., Heritage, J., & Beckett, M. (2010). A watershed in White House journalism: Explaining the post-1968 rise of aggressive presidential news. Political Communication, 27(3), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.496712
  • Clayman, S. E., Elliott, M. N., Heritage, J., & Beckett, M. (2012). The president’s questioners: Consequential attributes of the White House press corps. The International Journal of Press/ Politics, 17(1), 100–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211420867
  • Clayman, S. E., Elliott, M. N., Heritage, J., & McDonald, L. (2006). Historical trends in questioning presidents 1953–2000. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 36(4), 561–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2006.02568.x
  • Clayman, S. E., & Heritage, J. (2002a). The new interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge University Press.
  • Clayman, S. E., & Heritage, J. (2002b). Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of U.S. presidents Eisenhower and Reagan. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 749–775. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02572.x
  • Clayman, S. E., Heritage, J., Elliott, M. N., & McDonald, L. (2007). When does the watchdog bark?: Conditions of aggressive questioning in presidential news conferences. American Sociological Review, 72(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200102
  • Clayman, S. E., Heritage, J., & Hill, A. (2020). Gender matters in questioning presidents. eds. A. Smith & M. Higgins. Journal of Language and Politics, Special Issue on Mediated Communication of Gender and Sexuality in Contemporary Politics, 19(1), 125–143.
  • Clayman, S. E., Heritage, J., & Maynard, D. W. (in press). The ethnomethodological lineage of conversation analysis. D. W. Maynard & J. Heritage (Eds.), Praxis and social order: Garfinkel and the ethnomethodology movement past, present, and future. Oxford University Press.
  • Cornwell, E. (1965). Presidential leadership of public opinion. Indiana University Press.
  • Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2011). Grammaticalization and conversation. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 424–437). Oxford University Press.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
  • Defour, T., & Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M. (2010). Positive appraisal as a core meaning of well: A aorpus-based analysis in middle and early modern English data. English Studies, 91(6), 643–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2010.488849
  • Deppermann, A. (2018). Changes in turn-design over interactional histories – The case of instructions in driving school lessons. In A. Deppermann & J. Streeck (Eds.), Time in embodied interaction (pp. 293–324). John Benjamins.
  • Deppermann, A. & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2021/this issue). Longitudinal conversation analysis - introduction to the special issue. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899707
  • Deppermann, A., & Schmidt, A. (2021/this issue). How shared meanings and uses emerge over an interactional history: Wabi sabi in a series of theatre rehearsals. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(2), 203–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899714
  • Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectices, 31(1), 105–124.
  • Evans, J., & Foster, J. G. (2019). Computation and the sociological imagination. Contexts, 18(4), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504219883850
  • Frankfort-Nachmias, C., & Nachmias, D. (2008). Research methods in the social sciences (7th ed). Worth Publishers.
  • Gerard, J. M., & Cohn, J. F. (2016). A primer on observational measurement. Assessment, 23(4), 404–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116635807
  • Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. J. (1987). Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics, 1(1), 1–54. https://doi.org/10.1075/iprapip.1.1.01goo
  • Haiman, J. (1998). Talk is cheap: Sarcasm, alienation, and the evolution of language: Sarcasm, alienation and the evolution of language. Oxford University Press.
  • Heritage, J. (2002). The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10–11), 1427–1446. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00072-3
  • Heritage, J. (2018). Turn-initial particles in English: The cases of oh and well. In J. Heritage & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Turn-initial particles across languages (pp. 149–183). John Benjamins.
  • Heritage, J., & Atkinson, J. M. (1984). Introduction. In AtkinsonJ. M. & HeritageJ. (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 1–16). Cambridge University Press.
  • Heritage, J., Boyd, E., & Kleinman, L. (2001). Subverting criteria: The role of precedent in decisions to finance surgery. Sociology of Health & Illness, 23(5), 708–728. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00272
  • Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. E. (2013). The changing tenor of questioning over time: Tracking a question form across U.S. presidential news conferences 1953-2000. Eds. M. Broersma, B. Den Herder, & B. Schohaus. The Changing Dynamics between Journalists and Sources, Special Issue of Journalism Practice, 7(4), 481–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.802485
  • Heritage, J., & Maynard, D. W. (2006). Communication in medical care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge University Press.
  • Hopper, R., & LeBaron, C. (1998). How gender creeps into talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3101_4
  • Jucker, A. H. (1997). The discourse marker well in the history of English. English Language and Linguistics, 1(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136067430000037X
  • Jucker, A. H. (2002). Discourse markers in early modern English. In P. Trudgill & R. Watts (Eds.), Alternative histories of English (pp. 210–230). Routledge.
  • Kimberlin, C. L., & Winterstein, A. G. (2008). Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 54(23), 2276–2284. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp070364
  • Kumar, M. J. (2003). Source material: Does this constitute a press conference?: Defining and tabulating modern presidential press conferences. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 33(1), 221–237.
  • Pekarek Doehler, S. & Balaman, U. (2021/this issue). The routinization of grammar as a social action format: A longitudinal study of video-mediated interactions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899710
  • Pekarek Doehler, S., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2015). The development of L2 interaction competence: Evidence from turn-taking organization, sequence organization, repair organization, and preference organization. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 233–267). Walter de Gruyter.
  • Pekarek Doehler, S., Wagner, J., & González-Martínez, E. (Eds.). (2018). Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Pfeiffer, M. & Marina, A. (2021/this issue). Recruiting assistance in early childhood: Longitudinal changes in the use of ‘oh+X’ as a way of reporting trouble in German. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(2), 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899708
  • Pike, K. (1967). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior (2nd ed.). Mouton.
  • Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 21–27). Cambridge University Press.
  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Between micro and macro: Contexts and other connections. In J. Alexander, B. Giesen, & R. Munch (Eds.), The micro-macro link (pp. 207–234). University of California Press.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Reflections on talk and social structure. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure (pp. 44–70). University of California Press.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1992). On talk and its institutional occasions. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 101–134). Cambridge University Press.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1993). Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(1), 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2601_5
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102(1), 161–216. https://doi.org/10.1086/230911
  • Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
  • Schourup, L. (1999). Shakespeare’s well. Joshidai Bungaku, 51, 83–115.
  • Singer, J. D. (1982). Variables, indicators, and data: The measurement problem in macropolitical research. Social Science History, 6(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.2307/1171105
  • Skogmyr Marian, K. (2021/this issue). Initiating a complaint: Change over time in French L2 speakers’ practices. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899709
  • Sleeth, C. R. (1982, September 24). The OED. Times Literary Supplement, 1036.
  • Smith, C. (1990). Presidential press conferences: A critical approach. Praeger.
  • Stivers, T. (2015). Coding social interaction: A heretical approach in conversation analysis? Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.993837
  • Stivers, T., & Majid, A. (2007). Questioning children: Interactional evidence of implicit bias in medical interviews. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70(4), 424–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250707000410
  • Stivers, T., Sidnell, J., & Bergen, C. (2018). Children’s responses to questions in peer interaction: A window into the ontogenesis of interactional competence. Journal of Pragmatics, 124, 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.11.013
  • Taavitsainen, I. (1995). Interjections in early modern English. In A. H. Jucker (Ed.), Historical pragmatics. Pragmatic developments in the history of English (pp. 439–465). John Benjamins.
  • Taavitsainen, I. (1997). Exclamations in late middle English. In J. Fisiak (Ed.), Studies in middle English linguistics (pp. 573–607). Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Traugott, E. C. (2010). Dialogic contexts as motivations for syntactic change. In R. A. Cloutier, A. M. Hamilton-Brehm, & W. A. Kretzschmar Jr. (Eds.), Variation and change in English grammar and lexicon (pp. 11–27). De Gruyter Mouton.
  • Traugott, E. C. (2012). The status of onset contexts in analysis of micro-changes. In M. Kitö (Ed.), English corpus linguistics: Crossing paths (pp. 221–255). Brill Rodopi.
  • Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B. (2002). Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge University Press.
  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. University of California Press.
  • Wu, F., Cheng, Y., & Chao, D. (2017). Global questioners: Examining journalists’ aggressiveness at Chinese premiers’ press conferences (1993–2015). Asian Journal of Communication, 27(4), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2017.1281322

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.