References
- Belic , Aleksandar . 1909 . Zametki po čakavskim govoram , Vol. 14.2 , 181 – 266 . St. Petersburg : Izvestija Otdelenija russkogo jazyka i slovesnosti Imperatorskoj Akademii Nauk .
- Benveniste , Emile . 1968 . “ Mutations of linguistic categories ” . In Directions for historical linguistics , Edited by: Lehmann , W.P. and Malkiel , Y. 85 – 94 . Austin : University of Texas Press .
- Hraste , Mate . 1935 . Čakavski dijalekat ostrva Hvara , Vol. 14 , 1 – 59 . Belgrade : Juznoslovenski Filolog .
- Ivić , Pavle . 1967 . “ The Serbocroatian case system in diachrony and diatopy ” . In To Honor Roman Jakobson , 995 – 10008 . The Hague : Mouton .
- Jakobson , Roman . 1936 . Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre . Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague , 6 : 240 – 88 .
- Kiparsky , Paul . 1965 . Phonological change , MIT . doctoral dissertation
- _____ . 1968 . “ Linguistic universals and linguistic change ” . In Universals in linguistic theory , Edited by: Bach , E. and Harms , R.T. 170 – 202 . New York : Holt .
- _____ . 1972 . “ Explanation in phonology ” . In Goals of linguistic theory , Edited by: Peters , S. 189 – 227 . Englewood Cliffs : Prentice‐Hall .
- Kuryłowicz , Jerzy . 1949 . La nature des procès dits ‘analogiques’ . Acta Linguistica , 5 : 15 – 37 .
- Mańczak , Witold . 1957 . Tendances générales des changements analogiques . Lingua , 7 : 298 – 325 . 387 – 420 .
- Meillet , Antoine . 1921 . “ l'évolution des formes grammaticales ” . In Linguistique historique et linguistique generale , 130 – 148 . 8 Paris : Collection linguistique de la Societe linguistique de Paris .
- Thomason , S.G. On the nature of analogical change . Paper read at the 1969 Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America .
- _____ . 1972 . Noun declension: synchrony and diachrony Unpublished ms.
- This paper is an extensively revised version of a paper read at the 1973 Summer Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America. Aside from more detailed discussion of examples, most of this revision has to do with the exposition of broader theoretical foundations for the descriptive framework employed. I would not have been able to expand my work in this direction without the benefit of many discussions with, and advice from Richmond H. Thomason, to whom I am deeply indebted for his assistance.