XEN Implant for Glaucoma Treatment: A Review of the Literature

REFERENCES

• Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:262–267. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.081224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo R, Shen W, Su C, Jiang S, Wang J. Relationship between the Pathogenesis of Glaucoma and miRNA. Ophthalmic Res. 2017;57:194–199. doi:10.1159/000450957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy JB, SooHoo JR, Kahook MY, Seibold LK. Selective laser trabeculoplasty: an update. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol. 2016;5:63–69. doi:10.1097/APO.0000000000000175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotecha A, Feuer WJ, Barton K, Gedde SJ. Tube versus trabeculectomy study group. Quality of life in the tube versus trabeculectomy study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;176:228–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gedde SJ, Singh K, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ. Tube versus trabeculectomy study group. The tube versus trabeculectomy study: interpretation of results and application to clinical practice. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23:118–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saheb H, Ahmed II. Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: current perspectives and future directions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23:96–104. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834ff1e7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavia C, Dallorto L, Maule M, Ceccarelli M, Fea AM. Minimally-invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0183142. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinod K, Gedde SJ. Clinical investigation of new glaucoma procedures. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2017;28:187–193. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis BA, Singh K, Lin SC, et al. Novel glaucoma procedures: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmol. 2011;118:1466–1480. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.03.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter GM, Coleman AL. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery: current status and future prospects. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:189–206. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S80490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari E. An update on implants for Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS). Ophthalmol Ther. 2017;6:233–241. doi:10.1007/s40123-017-0098-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr NM, Wang J, Barton K. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery as primary stand-alone surgery for glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;45:393–400. doi:10.1111/ceo.12888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis RA. Ab interno approach to the subconjunctival space using a collagen glaucoma stent. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:1301–1306. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.01.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheybani A, Reitsamer H, Ahmed II. Fluid dynamics of a novel micro-fistula implant for the surgical treatment of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:4789–4795. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-16625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheybani A, Lenzhofer M, Hohensinn M, Reitsamer H, Ahmed II. Phacoemulsification combined with a new ab interno gel stent to treat open-angle glaucoma: pilot study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:1905–1909. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.01.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheybani A, Dick HB, Ahmed II. Early clinical results of a novel Ab interno gel stent for the surgical treatment of open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2016;25:691–696. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Torregrosa VT, Á O-P, Cerdà-Ibáñez M, et al. Combined phacoemulsification and XEN45 surgery from a temporal approach and 2 incisions. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2016;91:415–421. doi:10.1016/j.oftal.2016.02.006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlenker MB, Gulamhusein H, Conrad-Hengerer I, et al. Risk factors for failure of standalone Ab interno gelatin microstent implantation versus standalone trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:1579–1588. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.05.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galal A, Bilgic A, Eltanamly R, Osman A. XEN glaucoma implant with mitomycin C 1-year follow-up: result and complications. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:5457246.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grover DS, Flynn WJ, Bashford KP, et al. Performance and safety of a new Ab interno gelatin stent in refractory glaucoma at 12 months. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;183:25–36. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.07.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fea AM, Spinetta R, Cannizzo PML, et al. Evaluation of bleb morphology and reduction in IOP and glaucoma medication following implantation of a novel gel stent. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:9364910.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Gregorio A, Pedrotti E, Russo L, Morselli S. Minimally invasive combined glaucoma and cataract surgery: clinical results of the smallest ab interno gel stent. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;38:1129–1134. doi:10.1007/s10792-017-0571-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansouri K, Guidotti J, Rao HL, et al. Prospective evaluation of standalone XEN gel implant and combined phacoemulsification-XEN gel implant surgery: 1-year results. J Glaucoma. 2018;27:140–147. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-García A, Romero C, Garzón N. “Dry Lake” technique for the treatment of hypertrophic bleb following XEN(®) Gel Stent placement. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2015;90:536–538. doi:10.1016/j.oftal.2015.03.003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinto Ferreira N, Abegão Pinto L, Marques-Neves C. XEN gel stent internal ostium occlusion: ab-interno revision. J Glaucoma. 2017;26:150–152. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salinas L, Chaudhary A, Guidotti J, Mermoud A, Mansouri K. Revision of a leaking bleb with XEN gel stent replacement. J Glaucoma. 2018;27:11–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dervenis N, Mikropoulou AM, Dervenis P, Lewis A. Dislocation of a previously successful XEN glaucoma implant into the anterior chamber: a case report. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17:148. doi:10.1186/s12886-017-0540-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim R, Lim KS. XEN implant-related endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:209. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.10.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Alessandro E, Guidotti JM, Mansouri K, Mermoud A. XEN-augmented baerveldt: a new surgical technique for refractory glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2017;26:90–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sng CCA, Wang J, Barton K. Caution in using the XEN-augmented baerveldt surgical technique. J Glaucoma. 2017;26:e257. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sng CC, Wang J, Hau S, Htoon HM, Barton K. XEN-45 collagen implant for the treatment of uveitic glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;46:339–345. doi:10.1111/ceo.13087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar