‘The role of accommodative function in myopic development: A review.’

References

• Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. May 1 2016;123(5):1036–1042. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prousali E, Haidich A, Fontalis A, Ziakas N, Brazitikos P, Mataftsi A. Efficacy and safety of interventions to control myopia progression in children : an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19(1):106. doi:10.1186/s12886-019-1112-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith EL, Hung L-F, Huang J, Blasdel TL, Humbird TL, Bockhorst KH. Effects of optical defocus on refractive development in monkeys: evidence for local, regionally selective mechanisms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(8):3864–3873. doi:10.1167/iovs.09-4969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith EL, Hung LF, Harwerth RS. Effects of optically induced blur on the refractive status of young monkeys. Vision Res. 1994;34(3):293–301. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)90088-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troilo D, Smith EL, Nickla DL, et al. IMI – report on experimental models of emmetropization and myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. Feb 28 2019;60(3):M31–88. doi:10.1167/iovs.18-25967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motlagh M, Geetha R. Physiology, Accommodation. StatPearls: StatPearls Publishing; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Woodman-Pieterse EC, Read SA, Collins MJ, Alonso-Caneiro D. Anterior scleral thickness changes with accommodation in myopes and emmetropes. Exp Eye Res. 2018 Dec;1(177):96–103. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2018.07.023.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis HA, Kao CY, Sinnott LT, Bailey MD. Changes in ciliary muscle thickness during accommodation in children. Optom Vis Sci. 2012 May;89(5):727–737. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e318253de7e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers JA. The choroid as a sclera growth regulator. Exp Eye Res. 2013;114:120–127. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2013.03.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong S, He X, Zhang BO, et al. Changes in choroidal thickness varied by age and refraction in children and adolescents: a 1-year longitudinal study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;213:46–56. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2020.01.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner S, Zrenner E, Strasser T. Emmetropes and myopes differ little in their accommodation dynamics but strongly in their ciliary muscle morphology. Vision Res. 2019 Oct;1(163):42–51. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2019.08.002.
   Google Scholar
• Del Águila-Carrasco AJ, Kruger PB, Lara F, López-Gil N. Aberrations and accommodation. In: Clinical and Experimental Optometry, Vol. 103. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2020:95–103.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes RPJ, Read SA, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ. Changes in ocular biometry during short-term accommodation in children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020 Sep 1;40(5):584–594. doi:10.1111/opo.12711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drexler W, Findl O, Schmetterer L, Hitzenberger CK, Fercher AF. Eye elongation during accommodation in humans: differences between emmetropes and myopes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:2140–2147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchison DA, Smith G. Possible errors in determining axial length changes during accommodation with the IOLMaster. Optom Vis Sci. 2004 Apr;81(4):283–286. doi:10.1097/00006324-200404000-00015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns DH, Allen PM, Edgar DF, Evans BJW. Sources of error in clinical measurement of the amplitude of accommodation. J Optom. 2020 Jan 1;13(1):3–14. doi:10.1016/j.optom.2019.05.002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Antona B, Barra F, Barrio A, Gonzalez E, Sanchez I. Repeatability intraexaminer and agreement in amplitude of accommodation measurements. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;247(1):121–127. doi:10.1007/s00417-008-0938-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmail H, Arblaster G. A comparison of the conventional and modified push-up methods of measuring the near point of accommodation. Br Ir Orthopt J. 2016;13:35. doi:10.22599/bioj.100.
   Google Scholar
• Bernal-Molina P, Vargas-Martín F, Thibos LN, López-Gil N. Influence of ametropia and its correction on measurement of accommodation. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Jun 1;57(7):3010–3016. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-18686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Cheng H, Yuan Y, et al. Change in choroidal thickness and the relationship with accommodation following myopic excimer laser surgery. Eye (Lond). Jul 1 2016;30(7):972–978. doi:10.1038/eye.2016.75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy RT, Iida T, Shiina K, Leibowitz HW. The effect of pupil size on accommodation. Vision Res. 1976 Jan 1;16(6):587–589. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(76)90004-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwiazda J, Thorn F, Bauer J, Held R. Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:90–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koomson NY, Amedo AO, Opoku-Baah C, Ampeh PB, Ankamah E, Bonsu K. Relationship between reduced accommodative lag and myopia progression. Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Jun 21;93(7):683–691. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berntsen DA, Sinnott LT, Mutti DO, Zadnik K. Accommodative lag and juvenile-onset myopia progression in children wearing refractive correction. Vision Res. 2011 May 11;51(9):1039–1046. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.02.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weizhong L, Zhikuan Y, Wen L, Xiang C, Jian G. A longitudinal study on the relationship between myopia development and near accommodation lag in myopic children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008 Jan;28(1):57–61. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2007.00536.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Jones-Jordan LA, et al. The response AC/A ratio before and after the onset of myopia. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. Mar 1 2017;58(3):1594–1602. doi:10.1167/iovs.16-19093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren Q, Yue H, Zhou Q. Effects of orthokeratology lenses on the magnitude of accommodative lag and accommodative convergence/accommodation. J Cent South Univ (Medical Sci. 2016 Feb 1;41(2):169–173.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary DJ, Allen PM. Facility of accommodation in myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2001;21(5):352–355. doi:10.1046/j.1475-1313.2001.00597.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandian A, Sankaridurg PR, Naduvilath T, et al. Accommodative facility in eyes with and without myopia. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. Nov 1 2006;47(11):4725–4731. doi:10.1167/iovs.05-1078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan H, Allen PM, Charman WN. Dynamics of accommodative facility in myopes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(9):4375–4382. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-0269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen PM, O’Leary DJ. Accommodation functions: co-dependency and relationship to refractive error. Vision Res. 2006 Feb;46(4):491–505. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.05.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han X, Xu D, Ge W, Wang Z, Li X, Liu WA. Comparison of the effects of orthokeratology lens, medcall lens, and ordinary frame glasses on the accommodative response in myopic children. Eye Contact Lens. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• The BP. Effect of orthokeratology on accommodative and convergence function: a clinic based pilot study. Optom Vis Performace. Jan 2013;1(5):162–167.
   Google Scholar
• Karimian F, Baradaran-Rafii A, Bagheri A, et al. Accommodative changes after photorefractive keratectomy in myopic eyes. Optom Vis Sci. Nov 2010;87(11):833–838. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181f6fccc.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felipe-Marquez G, Nombela-Palomo M, Cacho I, Nieto-Bona A. Accommodative changes produced in response to overnight orthokeratology. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Mar 21;253(4):619–626. doi:10.1007/s00417-014-2865-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozkan J, Fedtke C, Chung J, Thomas V, Chandra Bakaraju R. Short-term adaptation of accommodative responses in myopes fitted with multifocal contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2018;44(Suppl 1):S30–7. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000299.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen Y, Drobe B, Zhang C, et al. Accommodation is unrelated to myopia progression in Chinese myopic children. Sci Rep. Dec 1 2020;10(1):12056. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-68859-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batres L, Peruzzo S, Serramito M, Carracedo G. Accommodation response and spherical aberration during orthokeratology. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan 1;258(1):117–127. doi:10.1007/s00417-019-04504-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang P, Watt K, Chau T, Zhu J, Evans BJW, Swarbrick H. The impact of orthokeratology lens wear on binocular vision and accommodation: a short-term prospective study. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2018 Dec 1;41(6):501–506. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2018.08.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felipe-Marquez G, Nombela-Palomo M, Palomo-Álvarez C, Cacho I, Nieto-Bona A. Binocular function changes produced in response to overnight orthokeratology. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. Jan 1, 2017;255(1):179–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford K, Gifford P, Hendicott PL, Schmid KL. Near binocular visual function in young adult orthokeratology versus soft contact lens wearers. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2017 Jun 1;40(3):184–189. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2017.01.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Wang L, Li P, Li J. Accommodation function comparison following use of contact lens for orthokeratology and spectacle use in myopic children: a prospective controlled trial. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;11:1234–1238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Zhu S, Yang B, et al. Accommodation and binocular vision changes after wearing orthokeratology lens in 8- to 14-year-old myopic children. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. Feb 2, 2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira-da-mota AF, Costa J, Amorim-de-sousa A, González-Méijome JM, The QA. Impact of overnight orthokeratology on accommodative response in myopic subjects. J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 17;9(11):3687. doi:10.3390/jcm9113687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Alcocer J, Madrid-Costa D, Radhakrishnan H, Ferrer-Blasco T, Montés-Micó R. Changes in accommodation and ocular aberration with simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2012 Sep;38(5):288–294. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e3182654994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrant J, Severson H, Wildsoet CF. Accommodation in emmetropic and myopic young adults wearing bifocal soft contact lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008;28(1):62–72. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2007.00529.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong CR, Troilo D, Accommodation RK. Phoria in children wearing multifocal contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2017;94(3):353–360. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang P, Wildsoet CF. Acute and short-term changes in visual function with multifocal soft contact lens wear in young adults. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016;39(2):133–140. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2015.09.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrid-Costa D, Ruiz-Alcocer J, García-Lázaro S, Ferrer-Blasco T, Montés-Micó R. Optical power distribution of refractive and aspheric multifocal contact lenses: effect of pupil size. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2015 Oct 1;38(5):317–321. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2015.03.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altoaimi BH, Almutairi MS, Kollbaum PS, Bradley A. Accommodative behavior of young eyes wearing multifocal contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2018 May;95(5):416–427. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altoaimi BH, Almutairi MS, Kollbaum P, Bradley A. Accommodative behavior of eyes wearing aspheric single vision contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2017 Oct 1;94(10):971–980. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling T, Ohlendorf A, Varnas SR, Wahl S. Peripheral design of progressive addition lenses and the lag of accommodation in myopes. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Jul 1;58(9):3319–3324. doi:10.1167/iovs.17-21589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam CSY, Tang WC, Tse DYY, et al. Defocus incorporated multiple segments (DIMS) spectacle lenses slow myopia progression: a 2-year randomised clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol. Mar 1 2020;104(3):363–368. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao J, Huang Y, Li X, et al. Myopia control with spectacle lenses with aspherical lenslets: a 2-year randomized clinical trial. In: ARVO 2021 Annual Meeting: Virtual Meeting Details. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Bao J, Yang A, Huang Y, et al. One-year myopia control efficacy of spectacle lenses with aspherical lenslets. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021; bjophthalmo l–2020–318367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughman J, Flitcroft DI. The acceptability and visual impact of 0.01% atropine in a Caucasian population. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100:1525–1529. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper J, Eisenberg N, Schulman E, et al. Maximum atropine dose without clinical signs or symptoms. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90(12):1467–1472. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chia A, Chua W-HW-H, Fong A, et al. Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia: safety and efficacy of 0.5%, 0.1%, and 0.01% Doses (Atropine for the treatment of myopia 2). Ophthalmology. Feb 2012;119(2):347–354. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yam J, Li F, Zhang X, et al. Two-year clinical trial of the low-concentration atropine for myopia progression (LAMP) study: phase 2 report. Ophthalmology. Jul 1 2020;127(7):910–919. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.12.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan D, Tay SA, Loh K-L, et al. Topical atropine in the control of myopia. Asia-Pac J Ophthalmol. 2016;5(6):424–428. doi:10.1097/APO.0000000000000232.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fu A, Stapleton F, Wei L, et al. Effect of low-dose atropine on myopia progression, pupil diameter and accommodative amplitude: low-dose atropine and myopia progression. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(11):1535–1541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon JS, Shin SY. The diluted atropine for inhibition of myopia progression in Korean children. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;11:1657–1662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaymak H, Fricke A, Mauritz Y, et al. Short-term effects of low-concentration atropine eye drops on pupil size and accommodation in young adult subjects. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256(11):2211–2217. doi:10.1007/s00417-018-4112-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joachimsen L, Farassat N, Bleul T, Böhringer D, Lagrèze W, Reich M. Side effects of topical atropine 0.05% compared to 0.01% for myopia control in German school children: a pilot study. Int Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun 1;41(6):2001–2008. doi:10.1007/s10792-021-01755-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS, Flitcroft DI, Gifford KL, et al. IMI - Myopia control reports overview and introduction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. Feb 28 2019;60(3):M1–19. doi:10.1167/iovs.18-25980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadnik K, Sinnott LT, Cotter SA, et al. Prediction of juvenile-onset myopia. JAMA Ophthalmol. Jun 1 2015;133(6):683–689. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.0471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prousali E, Dastiridou A, Ziakas N, Androudi S, Mataftsi A. Choroidal thickness and ocular growth in childhood. Surv Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul;66(2):261–275. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.06.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez R, González MD, Pérez MA, Garcia JA. Evolution of accommodative function and development of ocular movements in children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2003 Mar;23(2):97–107. doi:10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00093.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charman WN, Radhakrishnan H. Accommodation, pupil diameter and myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009 Jan;29(1):72–79. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00611.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar