382
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Examining Sender and Judge Variability in Honesty Assessments and Deception Detection Accuracy: Evidence for a Transparent Liar but No Evidence of Deception-General Ability

References

  • Blair, J. P., Levine, T. R., & Shaw, A. S. (2010). Content in context improves deception detection accuracy. Human Communication Research, 36, 423–442. doi:10.1111/hcre.2010.36.issue-3
  • Blair, J. P., Levine, T. R., & Vásquez, B. E. (2015). Producing deception detection expertise. Policing, 38, 71–85. doi:10.1108/PIJPSM-09-2014-0092
  • Bond, C. F., Jr., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214–234. doi:10.1207/pspr.2006.10.issue-3
  • Bond, C. F., Jr., & DePaulo, B. M. (2008). Individual differences in judging deception: Accuracy and bias. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 477–492. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.477
  • Frank, M. G., & Ekman, P. (2004). Appearing truthful generalizes across different deception situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 486–495. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.486
  • Levine, T. R. (2010). A few transparent liars: Explaining 54% accuracy in deception detection experiments. In C. Salmon (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 34, pp. 40–61). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Levine, T. R. (2014). Truth-Default Theory (TDT): A theory of human deception and deception detection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 378–392. doi:10.1177/0261927X14535916
  • Levine, T. R. (2015). New and improved accuracy findings in deception detection research. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.003
  • Levine, T. R., Park, H. S., & McCornack, S. A. (1999). Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: Documenting the “veracity effect.” Communication Monographs, 66, 125–144. doi:10.1080/03637759909376468
  • Levine, T. R., Serota, K. B., Shulman, H., Clare, D. D., Park, H. S., Shaw, A. S., … Lee, J. H. (2011). Sender demeanor: Individual differences in sender believability have a powerful impact on deception detection judgments. Human Communication Research, 37, 377–403. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01407.x
  • Levine, T. R., Shaw, A., & Shulman, H. (2010). Increasing deception detection accuracy with strategic questioning. Human Communication Research, 36, 216–231. doi:10.1111/hcre.2010.36.issue-2
  • Wright, G. R. T., Berry, C. J., & Bird, G. (2012). “You can’t kid a kidder”: Association between production and detection of deception in an interactive deception task. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 1–9.
  • Wright, G. R. T., Berry, C. J., & Bird, G. (2013). Deceptively simple … The “deceptive-general” ability and the need to put the liar under the spotlight. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 1–9. doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00152
  • Wright, G. R. T., Berry, C. J., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2015). Good liars are neither dark nor self-deceptive. PloS One, 10, e0127315. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127315

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.