Narrative Persuasion 2.0: Transportation in Participatory Websites

References

• Apple, M., & Malečkar, B. (2012). The influence of paratext on narrative persuasion: Fact, fiction, or fake? Human Communication Research, 38(4), 459–484. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01432.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braddock, K., & Dillard, J. P. (2016). Meta-analytic evidence for the persuasive effect of narratives on beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. Communication Monographs, 83(4), 446–467. doi:10.1080/03637751.2015.1128555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, W. (1996). The nature of narrative suspense and the problem of rereading. In P. Vorderer, H. Wulff, & M. Friedrichsen, (Eds.), Suspense. Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. 107-128). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
   Google Scholar
• Emmert, M., Meier, F., Pisch, F., & Sander, U. (2013). Physician choice making and characteristics associated with using physician-rating websites: Cross-sectional study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(8), e187. doi:10.2196/jmir.2702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247–282). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, K., Freling, R., Alhoquail, S., Cho, H. Y., & Freling, T. (2014). How online product reviews affect retail sales: A meta-analysis. Journal of Retailing, 90, 217–232. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2014.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, R. A., Racherla, P., & Bush, V. D. (2014). What we know and don’t know about online word-of-mouth: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28, 167–183. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2014.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., Boninger, D. S., Chuang, Y. C., Berent, M. K., & Carnot, C. G. (1993). Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1132–1151. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, Y. (2015). Responses to negative student evaluations on RateMyProfessors.com: The effect of instructor statement of credibility on student lower-level cognitive learning and state motivation to learn. Communication Education, 64, 455–471. doi:10.1080/03634523.2015.1047877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackiewicz, J. (2010). Assertions of expertise in online product reviews. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24(1), 3–28. doi:10.1177/1050651909346929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 413–439. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, B. J., & McQuarrie, E. F. (2010). Narrative and persuasion in fashion advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 369–392. doi:10.1086/653087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racherla, P., & Friske, W. (2012). Perceived “usefulness” of online consumer reviews: An exploratory investigation across three services categories. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(6), 548–559. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2012.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12, 173–191. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00265.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D., Menon, S., & Sivakumar, K. (2005). Online peer and editorial recommendations, trust, and choice in virtual markets. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(3), 15–37. doi:10.1002/dir.20041
   Google Scholar
• Till, B. D., & Busler, M. (2000). The match-up hypothesis: Physical attractiveness, expertise, and the role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intent and brand beliefs. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 1–13. doi:10.1080/00913367.2000.10673613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukachinsky, R., & Tokunaga, R. S. (2013). The effects of engagement with entertainment. Communication Yearbook, 37, 287–322.
   Google Scholar
• van Laer, T., De Ruyter, K., Visconti, L. M., & Wetzels, M. (2014). The extended transportation-imagery model: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of consumers’ narrative transportation. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 797–817. doi:10.1086/673383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., DeAndrea, D., Kim, J., & Anthony, J. C. (2010). The influence of online comments on perceptions of antimarijuana public service announcements on YouTube. Human Communication Research, 36, 469–492. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.0138.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & Jang, J. (2012). Communication processes in participatory websites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18, 2–15. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01592.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., Liang, Y., Ganster, T., Wohn, Y., & Emington, J. (2012). Online reviews, helpfulness ratings, and consumer attitudes: An extension of congruity theory to multiple sources in Web 2.0. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18, 97–112. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01592.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., van der Heide, B., Hamel, L. M., & Shulman, H. C. (2009). Self-generated versus other generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: A test of warranting theory using Facebook. Communication Research, 36, 229–253. doi:10.1177/0093650208330251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar