References
- Baron, R. A. (1971). Behavioral effects of interpersonal attraction: Compliance with requests from liked and disliked others. Psychonomic Science, 25, 325–326.
- Boster, F. J., Cruz, S., Manata, B., DeAngelis, N., & Zhuang, J. (2016). A meta-analytic review of the effect of guilt on compliance. Social Influence, 11, 54–67. doi:10.1080/15534510.2016.1142892
- Burger, J. M. (1999). The foot-in-the-door compliance procedure: A multiple process analysis and review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 303–325.
- Burger, J. M., Soroka, S., Gonzago, K., Murphy, E., & Somerwell, E. (2001). The effect of fleeting attraction on compliance to requests. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1578–1586. doi:10.1177/01461672012712002
- Carpenter, C. J. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the “but you are free” compliance-gaining technique. Communication Studies, 64, 6–17. doi:10.1080/10510974.2012.727941
- Dolinski, D., Ciszek, M., Godlewski, K., & Zawadzki, M. (2002). Fear-then-relief, mindlessness, and cognitive deficits. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 435–447. doi:10.1002/ejsp.100
- Dolinski, D., Nawrat, M., & Rudak, I. (2001). Dialogue involvement as a social influence technique. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1395–1406. doi:10.1177/01461672012711001
- Guéguen, N., Joule, R. V., Halimi-Falkowicz, S., Pascual, A., Fischer-Lokou, J., & Dufourcq-Brana, M. (2013). I’m free but I’ll comply with your request: Generalization and multidimensional effects of the “evoking freedom” technique. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 116–137. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00986.x
- Guéguen, N., & Pascual, A. (2000). Evocation of freedom and compliance: The “but you are free of …” technique. Current Research in Social Psychology, 5, 264–270.
- Guéguen, N., Silone, F., & David, M. (2015). The effect of the “evoking freedom” technique on an unusual and disturbing request. Psychological Reports, 116, 936–940. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00986.x
- Hamilton, M. (2017). Path analysis. In M. Allen (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 1194–1197). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781483381411.n414
- Hunter, J. E., & Gerbing, D. W. (1982). Unidimensional measurement, second order factor analysis, and causal models. Research in Organizational Behavior, 4, 267–320.
- Langer, E. J., Blank, A., & Chanowitz, B. (1978). The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of “placebic” information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 635–642. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.6.635
- Samson, L. (2009). Soumission librement consentie: études interculturelles: France, Roumanie, Russie: procédure de toucher versus, procédure de “vous-êtes-libre-de?” [Voluntary compliance: Intercultural studies: France, Romania, and Russia: Touch technique versus “you are free?”] ( Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.theses.fr/2009AIX10087
- Samson, L. (2010). Recherches expérimentales dans le paradigme de la soumission librement consentie [Research in the voluntary agreement paradigm]. Psihologia Socială, 26, 73–84.
- Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting for error and bias in research findings (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.