422
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Criticism From Artificial Agents: Prior Interaction Reduces Negative Effects

References

  • Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Oxford, UK: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Bachman, G. F., & Guerrero, L. K. (2006). Relational quality and communicative responses following hurtful events in dating relationships: An expectancy violations analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(6), 943–963. doi:10.1177/0265407506070476
  • Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
  • Bickmore, T. W., Pfeifer, L. M., Byron, D., Forsythe, S., Henault, L. E., Jack, B. W., … Paasche-Orlow, M. K. (2010). Usability of conversational agents by patients with inadequate health literacy: Evidence from two clinical trials. Journal of Health Communication, 15(S2), 197–210. doi:10.1080/10810730.2010.499991
  • Fincham, F. D., Beach, S., & Nelson, G. (1987). Attribution processes in distressed and nondistressed couples: 3. Causal and responsibility attributions for spouse behavior. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11(1), 71–86. doi:10.1007/BF01183133
  • Fitzpatrick, K. K., Darcy, A., & Vierhile, M. (2017). Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): A randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mental Health, 4(2), e19. doi:10.2196/mental.7785
  • Fuhrman, R. W., Flannagan, D., & Matamoros, M. (2009). Behavior expectations in cross‐sex friendships, same‐sex friendships, and romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 16(4), 575–596. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01240.x
  • Greene, K., Derlega, V. L., & Mathews, A. (2006). Self-disclosure in personal relationships. In A. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 1268–1328). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ho, A., Hancock, J., & Miner, A. S. (2018). Psychological, relational, and emotional effects of self-disclosure after conversations with a chatbot. Journal of Communication, 68(1), 712–734. doi:10.1093/joc/jqy026
  • Jin, B. (2013). Hurtful texting in friendships: Satisfaction buffers the distancing effects of intention. Communication Research Reports, 30(2), 148–156. doi:10.1080/08824096.2012.763026
  • Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Lee, S. A., & Liang, Y. (2015). Reciprocity in computer-human interaction: Source-based, norm-based, and affect-based explanations. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(4), 234–240. doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0458
  • Lisetti, C., Amini, R., Yasavur, U., & Rishe, N. (2013). I can help you change!: An empathic virtual agent delivers behavior change health interventions. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 4(4), 19. doi:10.1145/2544103
  • Moon, Y. (2000). Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit self-disclosure from consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), 323–339. doi:10.1086/209566
  • Moon, Y., & Nass, C. (1996). How “real” are computer personalities? Psychological responses to personality types in human-computer interaction. Communication Research, 23(6), 651–674. doi:10.1177/009365096023006002
  • Mordoch, E., Osterreicher, A., Guse, L., Roger, K., & Thompson, G. (2013). Use of social commitment robots in the care of elderly people with dementia: A literature review. Maturitas, 74(1), 14–20. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.10.015
  • Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Carney, P. (1999). Are people polite to computers? Responses to computer‐based interviewing systems. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(5), 1093–1109. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00142.x
  • Nass, C. I., Moon, Y., & Green, N. (1997). Are machines gender neutral? Gender‐stereotypic responses to computers with voices. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(10), 864–876. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00275.x
  • Nass, C. I., & Yen, C. (2010). The man who lied to his laptop: What machines teach us about human relationships. New York, NY: Current.
  • Pierce, C. A., Byrne, D., & Aguinis, H. (1996). Attraction in organizations: A model of workplace romance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(1), 5–32. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199601)17:1<5::AID-JOB734>3.0.CO;2-E
  • Reeves, B., & Nass, C. I. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Snyder, C. R., Shenkel, R. J., & Lowery, C. R. (1977). Acceptance of personality interpretations: The “Barnum effect” and beyond. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45(1), 104–114. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.45.1.104
  • Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (2002). Liking some things (in some people) more than others: Partner preferences in romantic relationships and friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19(4), 463–481. doi:10.1177/0265407502019004048
  • Swap, W. C. (1977). Interpersonal attraction and repeated exposure to rewarders and punishers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3(2), 248–251. doi:10.1177/014616727700300219
  • Tay, B., Jung, Y., & Park, T. (2014). When stereotypes meet robots: The double-edge sword of robot gender and personality in human-robot interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 75–84. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.014
  • Taylor, S. E., & Koivumaki, J. H. (1976). The perception of self and others: Acquaintanceship, affect, and actor-observer differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33(4), 403–408. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.33.4.403
  • von der Putten, A. M., Krämer, N. C., Gratch, J., & Kang, S. H. (2010). “It doesn’t matter what you are!” Explaining social effects of agents and avatars. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1641–1650. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.012
  • Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 1–27. doi:10.1037/h0025848

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.