An empirical comparison of back burners, hookups, and friends with benefits relationships in young adults

References

• Afifi, W. A., & Faulkner, S. L. (2000). On being just friends: The frequency and impact of sexual activity in cross sex friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(2), 205–222. doi:10.1177/0265407500172003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bisson, M. A., & Levine, T. R. (2009). Negotiating a friends with benefits relationship. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(1), 66–73. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9211-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boislard, M.-A., van de Bongardt, D., & Blais, M. (2016). Sexuality (and lack thereof) in adolescence and early adulthood: A review of the literature. Behavioral Sciences, 6(1), 8. doi:10.3390/bs6010008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borzea, D., & Dillow, M. R. (2017). Dispositional characteristics of individuals involved in back burner relationships. Communication Research Reports, 34, 316–325. doi:10.1080/08824096.2017.1350572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claxton, S. E., & van Dulmen, M. H. (2013). Casual sexual relationships and experiences in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 1(2), 138–150. doi:10.1177/2167696813487181
   Google Scholar
• Dibble, J. L., & Drouin, M. (2014). Using modern technology to keep in touch with back burners: An investment model analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 96–100. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibble, J. L., Drouin, M., Aune, K. S., & Boller, R. R. (2015). Simmering on the back burner: Communication with and disclosure of relationship alternatives. Communication Quarterly, 63(3), 329–344. doi:10.1080/01463373.2015.1039719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibble, J. L., Levine, T. R., & Park, H. S. (2012). The Unidimensional Relationship Closeness Scale (URCS): Reliability and validity evidence for a new measure of relationship closeness. Psychological Assessment, 24(3), 565. doi:10.1037/a0026265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dube, S., Lavoie, F., Blais, M., & Hebert, M. (2017). Psychological well-being as a predictor of casual sex relationships and experiences among adolescents: A short-term prospective study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 1807–1818. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0914-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. The Journal of Sex Research, 43, 255–267. doi:10.1080/00224490609552324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Measuring passionate love in intimate relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 9, 383–410. doi:10.1016/S0140-1971(86)80043-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, M., Morrison, K., & Asada, K. J. K. (2005). What’s love got to do with it? Exploring the impact of maintenance rules, love attitudes, and network support on friends with benefits relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 69(1), 49–66. doi:10.1080/10570310500034154
   Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., & Balzarini, R. N. (2016). Unweaving the rainbow of human sexuality: A review of one-night stands, serious romantic relationships, and the relationship space in between. In K. Aumer (Ed.), The psychology of love and hate in intimate relationships (pp. 13–28). Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsey, A., Pomroy, B., & Martin, C. (1948). Sexual behaviour in the human male. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. A., Atkins, D. C., Blayney, J. A., Dent, D. V., & Kaysen, D. L. (2013). What is hooking up? examining definitions of hooking up in relation to behavior and normative perceptions. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 757–766. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.706333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelson, M. J., & Aboud, F. E. (1999). Measuring friendship quality in late adolescents and young adults: McGill friendship questionnaires. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 31(2), 130–132. doi:10.1037/h0087080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, J., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Young adults’ emotional reactions after hooking up encounters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(2), 321–330. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9652-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37(1), 76–88. doi:10.1080/00224490009552023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, C., Blais, M., Lavoie, F., Adam, B. D., Magontier, C., & Goyer, M.-F. (2015). The structure of casual sexual relationships and experiences among single adults aged 18–30 years old: A latent profile analysis. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 24(3), 215–227. doi:10.3138/cjhs.243-A1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357–387. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, W. E., Miller, R. S., & Belk, S. S. (1988). Development of the emotional self-disclosure scale. Sex Roles, 18(1–2), 59–73. doi:10.1007/BF00288017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentland, J. J., & Reissing, E. D. (2011). Taking casual sex not too casually: Exploring definitions of casual sexual relationships. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 20(3), 75–92.
   Google Scholar