Group Writing versus Individual Writing—Is there a Difference in Achievement?

References

• American Business Communication Association. 1991 . Unit III: Research and methodology: How to teach small group decision-making in a basic business communication class National Committee Report Teaching Methodology and Concepts Committee—Subcommittee—3. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 234 441)
   Google Scholar
• Bacon , T. R. 1990 . Collaboration in a pressure cooker . Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication , 53 ( 2 ) : 4 – 8 .
   Google Scholar
• Clifford , J. 1981 . Composing in stages: The effects of a collaborative pedagogy . Research in the Teaching of English , 15 : 37 – 53 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosier , R. A. and Aplin , J. C. 1980 . A critical view of dialectical inquiry as a tool in strategic planning . Strategic Management Journal , 1 : 343 – 365 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosier , R. A. , Ruble , T. L. and Aplin , J. C. 1978 . An evaluation of the effectiveness of dialectical inquiry systems . Management Science , 24 ( 14 ) : 1483 – 1490 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullinan , M. 1987 . Developing business writing skills through group activity . Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication , 50 ( 1 ) : 21 – 23 .
   Google Scholar
• Johnson , D. W. and Johnson , R. T. 1990 . “ Cooperative learning and achievement ” . In Cooperative learning: Theory and research , Edited by: Sharan , S. 23 – 37 . New York, NY : Praeger .
   Google Scholar
• Lunsford , A. and Ede , L. 1986 . Why write … together: A research update . Rhetoric Review , 5 ( 1 ) : 71 – 81 .
   Google Scholar
• Milkovich , G. T. and Boudreau , J. W. 1991 . Human resource management , Homewood, IL : Irwin .
   Google Scholar
• O'Donnell , A. M. , Dansereau , D. F. , Rocklin , T. R. , Lambiotte , J. G. , Hythecker , V. I. and Larson , C. O. 1985 . Cooperative writing: Direct effects and transfer . Written Communication , 2 : 307 – 315 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donnell , A. M. , Dansereau , D. F. , Rocklin , T. R. , Larson , C. O. , Hythecker , V. I. , Young , M. D. and Lambiotte , J. G. 1987 . Effects of cooperative and individual rewriting on an instruction writing task . Written Communication , 4 : 90 – 99 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothwell , J. D. 1992 . In mixed company: Small group communication , Orlando, FL : Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich .
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute, Inc. 1989 . SAS/STAT user's guide , Cary, NC : Author .
   Google Scholar
• Schweiger , D. M. and Sandberg , W. R. 1989 . The utilization of individual capabilities in group approaches to strategic decision-making . Strategic Management Journal , 10 ( 1 ) : 31 – 43 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharan , S. and Sharan , Y. 1976 . Small-group teaching , Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Educational Technology Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Shaw , M. E. 1976 . Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior () , 2nd ed. , New York, NY : McGraw-Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Shaw , M. E. 1981 . Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior () , 3rd ed. , New York, NY : McGraw-Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Smith , D. E. 1986 . Training programs for performance appraisal: A review . Academy of Management Review , 11 ( 1 ) : 22 – 40 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson , A. R. 1988 . Writing effective business letters . International Trade Forum , : 22 – 29 . October-December
   Google Scholar
• White , E. M. 1985 . Teaching and assessing writing , San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass .
   Google Scholar