Strategic Alignment in Business Education: The Second Magic Bullet

REFERENCES

• American Association for Higher Education and Accreditation, American College Personnel Association (ACPA), & National Association of Student Personnel Administrators. (1998). Powerful partnerships. A shared responsibility for learning. A joint report. Retrieved from http://www.acpa.nche.edu/powerful-partnerships-shared-responsibility-learning
   Google Scholar
• American College Personnel Association (ACPA). (1996). The student learning imperative. Retrieved from http://acpa.nche.edu/sli/sli.htm
   Google Scholar
• Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB). (2012). Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/standards.asp
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18, 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• Brawer, F. B. (1990). Faculty development: The literature. An ERIC review. Community College Review, 18(1), 50–56.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. A. (1987). Instructional alignment: Searching for a magic bullet. Educational Researcher, 16(8), 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, W. (2000). Guía de las mejores escuelas de negocios europeas [Guide to the best European business schools]. Barcelona, Spain: Gestión.
   Google Scholar
• Gairín, J. (2002). Diseño, desarrollo e innovación curricular [Design, development and curricular innovation]. Madrid, Spain: Universitas.
   Google Scholar
• García Sánchez, N., & De Caso-Fuertes, A.M. (2002). ¿Es posible mejorar la comprensión en alumnos con dificultades de aprendizaje y/o bajo rendimiento sin que cambie la reflexividad hacia la escritura? [Is it possible to improve writing composition in learning disabilities and/or low achievement students without changes in reflexivity toward writing?] Psicothema, 14, 456–462.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (2004). Mejorar la enseñanza y el aprendizaje universitario mediante estrategias institucionales [Improving university teaching and learning through institutional strategies]. Educar, 33, 11–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., Habeshaw, T., & Yorke, M. (2000). Institutional learning and teaching strategies in English higher education. Higher Education, 40, 351–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grebner, S., Semmer, N.K., & Elfering, A. (2005). Working conditions and three types of well-being: A longitudinal study with self-report and rating data. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 31–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawawini, G. (2005). The future of business schools. Journal of Management Development, 24, 770–782.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Tecnológico de Monterrey. (2007). Investigación e innovación educativa [Education research and intervention]. Retrieved from http://sitios.itesm.mx/va/diie/
   Google Scholar
• Kaye, R., & Hawkridge, D. (2003). Learning from success. In R.H. Kaye (Ed.), Learning & teaching for business. Case studies of successful innovation (p. 215). London, England: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Legorreta, L., Kelley, C.A., & Sablynsky, C.J. (2006). Linking faculty development to the business school mission. Journal of Education for Business, 82, 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C., & Oppenheim, C. (2006). Competitive intelligence and development strategy in higher education in Tianjin, China. Information Development, 22, 58–63.
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, J.F., Cotton, C.C., & Van Auken, S. (1995). Business school emphasis on teaching, research and service to industry. Does where you sit determine where you stand? Journal of Organizational Change Management, 8(2), 3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Business Education Association (NBEA). (2001). This we believe about the emerging roles of the business educator. Retrieved from http://www.nbea.org/newsite/curriculum/policy/no_68.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J.C., & Berstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Palomba, C.A., & Banta, T.W. (1999). Assessment essentials. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M.E. (1996, November-December). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 61–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (1999). Learning to teach in higher education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sentell, T., Pingitore, G., Scheffler, R., & Schwalm, D. (2001). Gender differences in practice patterns and income among psychologists in professional practice. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 32, 607–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sierra, R. (2007). Técnicas de investigación social. Teoría y ejercicios [Social research techniques. Theory and exercises]. Madrid, Spain: Paraninfo.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (1997). Recomendación relativa a la condición del personal docente de la enseñanza superior [Recommendation concerning the status of teachers in higher education]. Retrieved from http://portal.unesco.org/es/ev.php-URL_ID=13144&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar