Are MFT-B Results Biased Because of Students Who Do Not Take the Test?

REFERENCES

• Allen, J.S., & Bycio, P. (1997). An evaluation of the educational testing service major field achievement test in business. Journal of Accounting Education, 15, 503–514.
   Google Scholar
• Barboza, G., & Pesek, J. (2012). Linking course-embedded assessment measures and performance on the educational testing service major field test in business. Journal of Education for Business, 87, 102–111.
   Google Scholar
• Bean, D.F., & Bernardi, R.A. (2002). Performance on the major field test in business: The explanatory power of SAT scores and gender. Journal of Private Enterprise, 17, 172–178.
   Google Scholar
• Bielinska-Kwapisz, A., & Brown, W. (2013). Differential gender performance on the Major Field Test in business. Journal of Education for Business, 88, 159–166.
   Google Scholar
• Bielinska-Kwapisz, A., Brown, W., & Semenik, R. (2012a). Interpreting standardized assessment test scores and setting performance goals in the context of student characteristics: The case of the major field test in business. Journal of Education for Business, 87, 7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Bielinska-Kwapisz, A., Brown, W., & Semenik, R. (2012b). Is higher better? Determinants and comparisons of performance on the major field test in business. Journal of Education for Business, 87, 159–169.
   Google Scholar
• Black, H.T., & Duhon, D.L. (2003). Evaluating and improving student achievement in business programs: The effective use of standardized assessment tests. Journal of Education for Business, 79, 90–98.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, H.F., Floyd, H.D., Sexton, E.A., & West, C.T. (2008). Using the Major Field Test -business as an assessment tool and impetus for program improvement: Fifteen years of experience at Virginia Military Institute. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 5, 75–88.
   Google Scholar
• Bycio, P., & Allen, J.S. (2007). Factors associated with performance on the Educational Testing Service (ETS) Major Field Achievement Test in Business (MFAT-B). Journal of Education for Business, 82, 196–201.
   Google Scholar
• Contreras, S., Badua, F., Chen, J.S., & Adrian, M. (2011). Documenting and explaining major field test results among undergraduate students. Journal of Education for Business, 86, 64–70.
   Google Scholar
• DeMong, R.F., Lindgren, J.H., & Perry, S. (1994). Designing an assessment program for accounting. Issues in Accounting Education, 9, 11–27.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, C., Tong, P., & Choi, B. (2010). A review of assessment of student learning programs at AACSB schools: A dean's perspective. Journal of Education for Business, 85, 299–306.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig, K.A., Frey, M.C., & Detterman, D.K. (2008). ACT and general cognitive ability. Intelligence, 36, 153–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumsden, K.G., & Scott, A. (1987). The economics student reexamined: Male-female differences in comprehension. Journal of Economic Education, 18, 365–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, P.M., Coleman, B.J., Steagall, J.W., & Gallo, A.A. (2011). The use of the ETS major field test for assurance of business content learning: Assurance of waste? Journal of Education for Business, 86, 71–77.
   Google Scholar
• Mirchandani, D., Lynch, R., & Hamilton, D. (2001). Using the ETS major field test in business: Implications for assessment. Journal of Education for Business, 77, 51–55.
   Google Scholar
• Settlage, D.M., & Settlage, L.A. (2011). A statistical framework for assessment using the ETS major field test in business. Journal of Education for Business, 86, 274–248.
   Google Scholar
• Terry, N., Mills, L., & Sollosy, M. (2008). Student grade motivation as a determinant of performance on the business Major Field ETS exam. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 5, 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Zeis, C., Waronska, A.K., & Fuller, R. (2009). Value-added program assessment using nationally standardized tests: Insights into internal validity issues. Journal of Academy of Business and Economics, 9, 114–128.
   Google Scholar