Using an In-Class Simulation in the First Accounting Class: Moving From Surface to Deep Learning

REFERENCES

• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (2002). AICPA core competency framework for entry into the accounting profession. Retrieved from http://www.aicpa.org/edu/corecomp.htm
   Google Scholar
• Ballantine, J. A., Duff, A., & Larres, P. M. (2008). Accounting and business students’ approaches to learning: A longitudinal study. Journal of Accounting Education, 26, 188–201.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Bonner, S. E. (1999). Choosing teaching methods based on learning objectives: An integrative framework. Issues in Accounting Education, 14, 11–39.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, M., Flood, B., & Willis, P. (2002). The relationship between learning approaches and learning outcomes: A study of Irish accounting students. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 11, 27–42.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, C., & Staehr, L. (2005). Improving students’ learning approaches through intervention in an information systems learning environment. Studies in Higher Education, 30, 181–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 674–684.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, R. A. (2002). Relationship of study approach and exam performance. Journal of Accounting Education, 20, 29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, A. (2004). Understanding academic performance and progression of first-year accounting and business economics students: The role of approaches to learning and prior academic achievement. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 13, 409–430.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, A., & McKinstry, S. (2007). Students’ approaches to learning. Issues in Accounting Education, 22, 183–214.
   Google Scholar
• Eizenberg, N. (1988). Approaches to learning anatomy: Developing a programme for preclinical medical students. In P. Ramsden (Ed.), Improving learning: New perspectives (pp. 178–195). London, England: Kogan.
   Google Scholar
• English, L., Luckett, P., & Mladenovic, R. (2004). Encouraging a deep approach to learning through curriculum design. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 13, 461–488.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, L. (2006). Active learning: An empirical study of the use of simulation games in the introductory financial accounting class. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 10(3), 93–103.
   Google Scholar
• Fransson, A. (1977). On qualitative differences in learning, IV-Effects of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic test anxiety on process and outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 244–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gow, L., Kember, D., & Cooper, B. (1994). The teaching context and approaches to study of accounting students. Issues in Accounting Education, 9, 118–130.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, M., Ramsay, A., & Raven, J. (2004). Changing the learning environment to promote deep learning approaches in first-year accounting students. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 13, 489–506.
   Google Scholar
• Libby, P. A. (1991). Barriers to using cases in accounting education. Issues in Accounting Education, 6(2), 193–213.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, U., & Meyer, J. H. F. (2005). ‘Towards a mapping of the student world’: The identification of variation in students’ conceptions of, and motivations to learn, introductory accounting. The British Accounting Review, 37, 177–204.
   Google Scholar
• Marriott, N. (2004). Using computerized business simulations and spreadsheet models in accounting education: A case study. Accounting Education, 13, 55–70.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). On qualitative difference in learning I – Outcomes and processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwen, B. (1994). Teaching critical thinking skills in business education. Journal of Education for Business, 70, 99.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, C. S., Rose, A. M., & Lehmann, C. M. (2004). Cooperative learning: Resources from the business disciplines. Journal of Accounting Education, 22, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Polimeni, R. S., Burke, J. A., & Benyaminy, D. (2009). Using computer simulations to recruit and train generation Y accountants. The CPA Journal, 79(5), 64–68.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (1979). Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment. Higher Education, 8, 411–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P., & Entwistle, N. J. (1981). Effects of academic departments on students approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 368–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, C. W., & Borthick, A. F. (2004). Business simulation to stage critical thinking in introductory accounting: Rationale, design, and implementation. Issues in Accounting Education, 19, 277–303.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, A. J. (2008). Integrating the AICPA core competencies into classroom teaching. The CPA Journal, 78(8), 64–67.
   Google Scholar
• Yazici, H. (2004). Student perceptions of collaborative learning in operations management classes. Journal of Education for Business, 80(2), 110–118.
   Google Scholar