What Makes a Top-Selling Textbook? Comparing Characteristics of AIS Textbooks

REFERENCES

• Abrahamson, E., & Amir, E. (1996). The information content of the President's letter to shareholders. Journal of Business, Finance, and Accounting, 23, 1157–1182.
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal, R., Chakraborty, S., Gollapudi, S., Kannan, A., & Kenthapadi, K. (2012). Quality of textbooks, and empirical study. Paper presented at ACM DEV 2012, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Badua, F., Sharifi, M., & Watkins, A. (2011). The topics are a-changing. Accounting Educators Journal, 21, 89–106.
   Google Scholar
• Bagranoff, N., Simkin, M., & Norman, C. (2009). Core concepts of accounting information systems (11th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bargate, K. (2012). Criteria considered by accounting faculty when selecting and prescribing textbooks, a South African study. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2, 114–123.
   Google Scholar
• Berelson, B. (1971). Content analysis in communication research. New York, NY: Hafner.
   Google Scholar
• Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (1999). Corporate environmental disclosure strategies: Determinants, costs, and benefits. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance, 14, 429–451.
   Google Scholar
• Cornachione, E. (2004). Quality of accounting textbooks: Measuring students’ comprehension with the cloze procedure. Paper presented at the Southern African Accounting Association, Durban, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Doost, R., McCombs, G., & Sharifi, M. (2003). The state of teaching accounting information systems: Is there a gap? Review of Business Information Systems, 7, 61–67.
   Google Scholar
• Elbeck, M., Williams, R., Peters, C. O., & Frankforter, S. (2009). What marketing educators look for when adopting a principles of marketing textbook. Marketing Education Review, 19, 49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J., Collison, D., Power, D., & Stevenson, L. (2007). Exploring lecturers’ perceptions of the emphasis given to different stakeholders in introductory accounting textbooks. Accounting Forum, 31, 113–127.
   Google Scholar
• Gackowski, Z. J. (2004). What to teach business students in MIS courses about data and information. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 1, 845–878.
   Google Scholar
• Gackowski, Z. J. (2010). Informing as a discipline, an initial proposal. Informing Science, the International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 13, 165–176.
   Google Scholar
• Gelinas, U., Dull, R., & Wheeler, P. (2012). Accounting information systems (9th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. (2011). Accounting information systems (8th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
   Google Scholar
• Hurt, R. (2012). Accounting information systems (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, S. C., Mehta, S. S., & Aun, B. L. (1999). The evaluation of business textbooks: An international perspective. Journal of Professional Services Marketing, 19, 141–149.
   Google Scholar
• Neu, D., Warsame, H., & Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting Organizations and Society, 23(3), 265–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patten, D. (2002). The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure. Accounting Organizations and Society, 27(8), 763–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prerumoso, R. (2012) Untitled working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Previts, G., & Brown, R. (1993). Development of government accounting: A content analysis of Journal of Accountancy. Accounting Historians Journal, 20, 119–139.
   Google Scholar
• Romney, M. B., & Steinbart, P. J. (2000). Accounting information systems (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Romney, M. B., & Steinbart, P. J. (2012). Accounting information systems (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. J., & DeRidder, J. J. (1997). The selection process for accounting textbooks: General criteria and publisher incentives—A survey. Issues in Accounting Education, 12, 367–384.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. J., & Muller, H. R. (1998). The ethics of publisher incentives in the marketing textbook selection decision. Journal of Marketing Education, 20, 258–267.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., & Taffler, R. (2000). The Chairman's statement: A content analysis of discretionary narrative disclosures. Accounting, Auditing, & Accountability Journal, 13, 624–646.
   Google Scholar
• Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2013). Epistme and techne. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/episteme-techne/
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, R. E., Clow, K. E., McConkey, C. W., & Silver, L. S. (2010). Differences in accounting and marketing professors’ criteria for textbook adoptions and preferred communications methods. The Accounting Educators’ Journal, 20, 33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, S. (1994). Citation patterns in the Journal of Statistics and Probability. Statistical Science, 9, 94–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tietz, W. (2007). Women and men in accounting textbooks: Exploring the hidden curriculum. Issues in Accounting Education, 22, 459–480.
   Google Scholar
• Toerner, M. C. (2006). Student readership of supplemental in-chapter material in introductory accounting textbooks. Journal of Education for Business, 82, 112–117.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, L., & Weickgennant, A. (2008). Accounting information systems controls and processes (1st ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Tuwajiri, S., Christensen, T., & Hughes, K. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance. Accounting Organizations and Society, 29(5), 447–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, O. J., Madison, T., & Welch, S. (2010). Accounting professionals’ value assessment of entry level IT skills and topics: A comparison of the differences between CPA firms and industry/government organizations. Issues in Information Systems, 11, 211–215.
   Google Scholar
• Wiseman, J. (1982). An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports. Accounting Organizations and Society, 7, 53–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar