The Glass Door Remains Closed: Another Look at Gender Inequality in Undergraduate Business Schools

REFERENCES

• Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB). (2013a). 2013 Business association standards. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/business/standards/2013/eligibility.asp
   Google Scholar
• Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB). (2013b). Business school questionnaire for undergraduate enrollment, faculty, and staff. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/datadirect
   Google Scholar
• Ball, J. A. (2012). The gender gap in undergraduate business programs in the United States. Journal of Education for Business, 87, 260–265.
   Google Scholar
• Bridger, H. (2010, December 1). Filling in the voids. Retrieved from http://www.broadinstitute.org/blog/filling-voids
   Google Scholar
• Catalyst. (2007). The bottom line: Corporate performance and women's representation on boards. Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/search/node/fortune%20500%20performance
   Google Scholar
• Catalyst. (2013). Why diversity matters. Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/why-diversity-matters
   Google Scholar
• Cebula, R. J., & Lopes, J. (1982). Determinates of student choice of undergraduate major field. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 303–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crombie, G., Pyke, S. W., Silverthorn, N., Jones, A., & Piccinin, S. (2003). Students’ perceptions of their classroom participation and instructor as a function of gender and context. The Journal of Higher Education, 74, 51–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, L. M., & Geyfman, V. (2012). Gender inequality in undergraduate business schools: The glass door effects. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 5, 46–70.
   Google Scholar
• Dodd-Frank Wall Street Financial Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Pub. L. 111–203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R. M., & Sandler, B. R. (1982). The classroom climate: A chilly campus climate for women? Washington, DC: Project on the Status and Education of Women, Association of American College.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R. M., & Sandler, B. R. (1984). Out of the classroom: A chilly campus climate for women? Washington, DC: Project on the Status and Education of Women, Association of American College.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, K., & Litten, L. (1982). Mapping the road to academia: A review of research on women, men, and the college selection process. In N. P. Perun (Ed.), The undergraduate woman, issues in education (pp. 73–77). Lexington, MA: Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Hossler, D., & Gallagher, K. (1987). Studying college choice: A three-phase model and the implications for policy makers. College and University, 2, 207–21.
   Google Scholar
• Krupnick, C. (1985). Women and men in the classroom: Inequality and its remedies. On Teaching and Learning, 1, 18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Leppel, K., Williams, M. L., & Waldauer, C. (2001). The impact of parental occupation and socioeconomic status on choice of college major. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 22, 373–394.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Y. (2009). Family socioeconomic status, parental involvement, and college major choices—Gender race/ethnic, and nativity patterns. Sociological Perspectives, 52, 211–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malgwi, C. A., Howe, M. A., & Burnaby, P. A. (2005). Influences on students’ choice of college major. Journal of Education for Business, 80, 275–282.
   Google Scholar
• MarketWatch. (2014, January 16). Once again, women hedge-fund managers beat the industry. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://blogs.marketwatch.com/thetell/2014/01/16/once-again-women-hedge-fund-managers-beat-the-industry
   Google Scholar
• Mauldin, S., Crain, J., & Mounce, P. (2000). The accounting principles instructor's influence on students’ decision to major in accounting. Journal of Education for Business, 75, 142–148.
   Google Scholar
• Montmarquette, C., Cannings, C., & Mahseredjian, S. (2002). How do people choose college majors? Economics of Education Review, 21, 543–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2012). The condition of education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2013, May 29). Breadwinner moms. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2013/05/29/breadwinner-moms/
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, R., Potter, G., & Saccucci, M. (2004). The selection of a business major: Elements influencing student choice and implications for outcomes assessment. Journal of Education for Business, 79, 152–157.
   Google Scholar
• Rask, K. N., & Bailey, E. M. (2002). Are faculty role models? Evidence from major choice in an undergraduate institution. Journal of Economic Education, 33, 99–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHRM Research. (2006). Talent managment: Driver for organizational sucess. Retrieved from http://www.shrm.org/Research/Articles/Articles/Documents/0606RQuartpdf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• St. John, E. P., & Starkey, J. B. (1995). An alternative to net price: Assessing the influence of prices and subsidies on within-year persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 66, 156–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Title IX of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended, 20 U.S.C 1681–1688 (1972).
   Google Scholar
• Turner, S. E., & Bowen, W. G. (1999). Choice of major: The changing (unchanging) gender gap. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 52, 289–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar