Bringing Reality to “Real Options”: An Experiential Exercise

REFERENCES

• Aguinis, H., & Bradley, K. J. (2014). Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational Research Methods, 17, 351–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, J. (1994). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, T., & Zeithaml, C. (1989). The psychological context of strategic decisions: A test of relevance to practitioners. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 587–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D. (1983). Risk premiums for decision regret. Management Science, 29, 1156–1166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, E. H. (1980). A risk-return paradox for strategic management. Sloan Management Review, 23(3), 33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, E. H. (1982). Risk seeking by troubled firms. Sloan Management Review, 23(4), 33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Bromiley, P. (1991). Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 37–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromiley, P., Miller, K., & Rau, D. (2001). Risk in strategic management research. In M. Hitt, R. Freeman, & J. Harrison (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of strategic management (pp. 259–288). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Burgleman, R., & Grove, A. (1996). Strategic dissonance. California Management Review, 38(2), 8–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Certo, S. (1975). Experiential training methodology, traditional training methodology, and perceived opportunity to satisfy needs. Simulation Games and Experiential Learning in Action, 2, 31–37.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, J., & Ruefli, T. (1996). Strategic risk: A state defined approach. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, T. (1988). Hedge-clipping, tree-felling and the management of ambiguity: The need for new images of decision making. In L. R. Pondy, R. J. Boland, Jr., & H. Thomas (Eds.), Managing ambiguity and change (pp. 37–50). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cyert, R., & March, J. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L. (1999). Performance-driven change: The organizational portfolio. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrier, W. (2001). Navigating the competitive landscape: The drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 858–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiegenbaum, A., & Thomas, H. (1986). Dynamic and risk measurement perspectives on Bowman's risk-return paradox for strategic management: An empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 7, 395–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiegenbaum, A., & Thomas, H. (1988). Attitudes toward risk and the risk-return paradox: Prospect theory explanations. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 85–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effect on organizations. St. Paul, MN: West.
   Google Scholar
• Gilley, K., Walters, B., & Olson, J. (2002). Top management team risk taking propensities and firm performance: Direct and moderating effects. Journal of Business Strategies, 19, 95–115.
   Google Scholar
• Gosen, J., & Washbush, J. (2004). A review of scholarship and assessing experiential learning and effectiveness. Simulation & Gaming, 35, 270–293.
   Google Scholar
• Greve, H. (1998). Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 58–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, J. (1988). Hedging and risk aversion in the foreign currency market. Journal of Futures Markets, 8, 657–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. (1988). Variable risk preferences and adaptive aspirations. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 9, 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, R. G. (1997). A real options logic for initiating technology positioning investments. Academy of Management Review, 22, 974–996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, G., & Bromiley, P. (1999). Risk and return in organizational decision making, Academy of Management Journal, 42, 330–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, K. (1998). Economic exposure and integrated risk management. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 497–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutt, P. C. (1998). Framing strategic decisions. Organizational Science, 9, 195–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pablo, A., Sitkin, S., & Jemison, D. (1996). Acquisition decision-making processes: The central role of risk. Journal of Management, 22, 723–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, T. B., & Wiseman, R. (1999). Decoupling risk taking from income stream uncertainty: A holistic model of risk. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 1037–1062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwenk, C. R. (1995). Strategic decision making. Journal of Management, 21, 211–236.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, C. A., & Dean, T. J. (2008). Testing the effects of prior performance on decision regret. Doubling-down, or all bets are off? Journal of Global Business Issues, 2, 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, C. A., Ryman, J. A., & Dean, T. J. (2008). How does prior financial performance of a hedging mechanism affect future hedging decisions? The Cooperative Accountant, 60, 71–78.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59, 251–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman, R., & Bromiley, P. (1996). Toward a model of risk in declining organizations: An empirical examination of risk, performance, and decline. Organizational Science, 7, 524–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman, R., & Gomez-Mejia, L. (1998). A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. Academy of Management Review, 23, 133–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar