Factors That Affect Students’ Capacity to Fulfill the Role of Online Learner

REFERENCES

• Aggarwal, A. K., Adlakha, V., & Mersha, T. (2006). Continuous improvement process in web-based education at a public university. E-Service Journal, 4(2), 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/changingcourse.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). Virtual classroom versus physical classroom: An exploratory comparison of class discussion patterns and student learning in asynchronous internet-based MBA course. Journal of Management Education, 24, 207–227.
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). How much does “subject matter” matter? A study of disciplinary effects in on-line MBA courses. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 57–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Does the community of inquiry framework predict outcomes in on-line MBA courses? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B. (2010). Sage, guide, both, or even more? An examination of instructor activity in on-line MBA courses. Computers and Education, 55, 1234–1244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B. (2013). Does discipline moderate COI-course outcomes relationships in online MBA courses? The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 16–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B. (2014). What might online delivery teach us about blended management education? Prior perspectives and future directions. Journal of Management Education, 38, 784–817. doi:10.1177/1052562914534244
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2007). The importance of participant interaction in online environments. Decision Support Systems, 43, 853–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B., Desai, A., Rau, B., & Sridhar, B. S. (2010). A review of research on online and blended learning in the management disciplines: 1994–2009. Organization Management Journal, 7, 39–55.
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B., & Rau, B. L. (2007). A study of disciplinary, structural, and behavioral effects on course outcomes in online MBA courses. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5, 65–95.
   Google Scholar
• Asimov, N. (2012, June 22). Online education has teachers conflicted. The San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved from http://www.sfgate.com/education/article/Online-education-has-teachers-conflicted-3654171.php.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, R. (2010). No, management is not a profession. Harvard Business Review, 88(7–8), 52–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beqiri, M. S., Chase, N. M., & Bishka, A. (2009). Online course delivery: An empirical investigation of factors affecting student satisfaction. Journal of Education for Business, 85, 95–100.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, R. M., Brauer, A., Abrami, P. C., & Surkes, M. (2004). The development of a questionnaire for predicting online learning achievement. Distance Education, 25, 31–47.
   Google Scholar
• Bocchi, J., Eastman, J. K., & Swift, C. O. (2004). Retaining the online learner: Profile of students in an online MBA program and implications for teaching them. Journal of Education for Business, 79, 245–253.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, R. (2009). Teaching online: How to get started. CTSE Newsletter, 5(2), 9.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. C., Jones, K. T., & Moreland, K. A. (2013). Online accounting education versus in-class delivery: Does course level matter? Issues in Accounting Education, 28, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, D. T., & French, E. M. (2014). Student ownership of learning as a key component of college readiness. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 1018–1034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comer, D. R., & Lenaghan, J. (2013). Enhancing discussions in the asynchronous online classroom: The lack of face-to-face interaction does not lessen the lesson. Journal of Management Education, 37, 261–294.
   Google Scholar
• Crow, S. M., Cheek, R. G., & Hartman, S. J. (2003). Anatomy of a train wreck: A case study in the distance learning of strategic management. International Journal of Management, 20, 335–341.
   Google Scholar
• Daymont, T., Blau, G., & Campbell, D. (2011). Deciding between traditional and online formats: Exploring the role of learning advantages, flexibility, and compensatory adaptation. Journal of Behavioral & Applied Management, 12, 156–175.
   Google Scholar
• DeSantis, N. (2012). “U.S. News” sizes up online degree programs, without saying who's no. 1. Chronicle of Higher Education, 58(20), A20.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, M., King, J., & Tague, G. (2001) Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 21, 516–525.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 157–172.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Tatham, R. L., &erson, R. E., & Black, W. (1998), Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Han, S., & Hill, J. R. (2006). Building understanding in asynchronous discussions: Examining types of online discourse. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(4), 29–50.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, D. E. (2008). Knowledge transfer in on-line learning environments. Journal of Marketing Education, 30, 93–105.
   Google Scholar
• Heyman, E. (2010). Overcoming student retention issues in higher education online programs. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(4). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter134/heyman134.html
   Google Scholar
• Holder, B. (2007). An investigation of hope, academics, environment, and motivation as predictors of persistence in higher education online programs. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 245–260.
   Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck, C. R., Zinkhan, G. M., & French, W. (2005). Distance learning trends and benchmarks: Lessons from an online MBA program. Marketing Education Review, 15(2), 39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, A., & Francesco, A. (2010). The influence of individualism-collectivism and power distance on use of feedback channels and consequences for learning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9, 243–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., & Kurlaender, M. (2014). College readiness and college completion at broad access four-year institutions. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 947–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. J., & Helms, M. M. (2008). Student perceptions of hybrid quality: Measuring and interpreting quality. Journal of Education for Business, 84, 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D. (1996). Open learning courses for adults: A model of student progress. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Kizlik, R. (2005). Getting ready for distance education: Distance Education Aptitude and Readiness Scale (DEARS). Adprima: Toward the best. Retrieved from http://www.adprima.com/dears.htm
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. S. (1990). The adult learner: A neglected species. Houston, TX: Gulf.
   Google Scholar
• Krentler, K. A., & Willis-Flurry, L. A. (2005). Does technology enhance actual student learning? The case of online discussion boards. Journal of Education for Business, 80, 316–321.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, Y., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K., & Belland, B. (2014). Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, J. A., & Singhania, R. P. (2004), A study of teaching and testing strategies in a required statistics course for undergraduate business students. Journal of Education for Business, 79, 333–338.
   Google Scholar
• Mariola, E., & Manley, J. (2002). Teaching finance concepts in a distance learning environment—A personal note. Journal of Education for Business, 77, 177–180.
   Google Scholar
• McIsaac, M. S., & Gunawardena, C. N. I. (1996). Distance education. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 403–437). New York, NY: Simon & Shuster Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McVay, M. (2001). How to be a successful distance learning student: Learning on the Internet. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Michinov, N., Brunot, S., Le Bohec, O., Juhel, J., & Delaval, M. (2011). Procrastination, participation, and performance in online learning environments. Computers & Education, 56, 243–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, C. (2013). Our reach. Retrieved from http://aacsbblogs.typepad.com/dataandresearch/accreditation/
   Google Scholar
• Palfrey, J. G., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Perreault, H., Waldman, L., & Zhao, M. A. J. (2002). Overcoming barriers to successful delivery of distance-learning courses. Journal of Education for Business, 77, 313–318.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants: Part I. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Redpath, L. (2012). Confronting the bias against on-line learning in management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 125–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, C. C., & Hullinger, H. (2008). New benchmarks in higher education: Student engagement in online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 84, 101–109.
   Google Scholar
• Salas, E., Kosarzycki, M. P., Burke, C. S., Fiore, S. M., & Stone, D. L. (2002). Emerging themes in distance learning research and practice: Some food for thought. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4, 135–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, P., Hayes, S., Vickers, J., Gozza-Cohen, M., Uzuner, S., Mehta, R., … Rangan, P. (2010). A re-examination of the community of inquiry framework: Social network and content analysis. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 10–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P. J., Murphy, K. L., & Mahoney, S. E. (2003). Toward identifying factors underlying readiness for online learning: An exploratory study. Distance Education, 24, 57–67.
   Google Scholar
• Sonner, B. S. (1999). Success in the capstone business course—Assessing the effectiveness of distance learning. Journal of Education for Business, 74, 243–248.
   Google Scholar
• Sperber, M. (2005). How undergraduate education became college lite—and a personal apology. In R. H. Hersh & J. Merrow (Eds.), Declining by degrees: Higher education at risk (pp. 131–143). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Straumsheim, C. (2014, July 7). Sloan goes online. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/07/07/sloan-consortium-renames-itself-online-learning-consortium
   Google Scholar
• Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 284–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swan, K. (2002). Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction. Education Communication and Information, 2, 23–49.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, W. G., & Sablan, J. R. (2014). Examining college readiness. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 943–946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. News and World Report. (2014). Best online graduate business programs ranking. http://www.usnews.com/education/online-education/mba/rankings?int=da9048
   Google Scholar
• Vamosi, A. R., Pierce, B. G., & Slotkin, M. H. (2004). Distance learning in an accounting principles course—Student satisfaction and perceptions of efficacy. Journal of Education for Business, 79, 360–366.
   Google Scholar
• Vroom, V. H., & Deci, E. L. (1971). The stability of post-decision dissonance: A follow-up study of the job attitudes of business school graduates. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 6, 36–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, Y., Kanawattanachai, P., & Citurs, A. (2002). Forging into the wired wilderness: A case study of a technology-mediated distributed discussion-based class. Journal of Management Education, 26, 139–163.
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. R. (2011). College presidents are bullish on online education but face a skeptical public. Chronicle of Higher Education, 58(2), A16.
   Google Scholar
• Zemsky, R., & Massy, W. F. (2004). Thwarted innovation: What happened to e-learning and why. Retrieved from http://thelearningalliance.info/Docs/Jun2004/ThwartedInnovation.pdf
   Google Scholar