References
- Ackerman, D., Chung, C., & Sun, J. C. (2014). Transitions in classroom technology: Instructor implementation of classroom management software. Journal of Education for Business, 89, 317–323.
- Arispe, K., & Blake, R. J. (2012). Individual factors and hybrid learning in a hybrid course. System, 40, 449–465.
- Estelami, H. (2012). An exploratory study of the drivers of student satisfaction and learning experience in hybrid-online and purely online marketing courses. Marketing Education Review, 22, 143–155.
- Haughton, J., & Kelly, A. (2015). Student performance in an introductory business statistics course: Does delivery mode matter? Journal of Education for Business, 90, 31–43.
- Jackson, M. J., & Helms, M. (2008). Student perceptions of hybrid courses: measuring and interpreting quality. Journal of Education for Business, 84, 7–12.
- Keough, S. M. (2012). Clickers in the classroom: A review and a replication. Journal of Management Education, 36, 822–847.
- Kilic-Cakmak, E., Karatass, S., & Ocak, M. A. (2009). An analysis of factors affecting community college students' expectations on e-learning. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10, 351–361.
- McFarlin, B. (2008). Hybrid lecture-online format increases student grades in an undergraduate exercise physiology course at a large urban university. Advances in Physiology Education, 32, 86–91.
- Prashar, A. (2015). Assessing the flipped classroom in operations management: A pilot study. Journal of Education for Business, 90, 126–138.
- Sams, A., & Bergmann, J. (2013). Flip your students' learning. Educational Leadership, 70(6), 16–20.
- Strayer, J. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environment Research, 15, 171–193.