Faculty salary as a predictor of student outgoing salaries from MBA programs

References

• Alpay, E., & Verschoor, R. (2014). The teaching researcher: Faculty attitudes toward the teaching and research roles. European Journal of Engineering Education, 39, 365–376.
   Google Scholar
• Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. (2013). Business school data trends 2013. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/˜/media/AACSB/Publications/data-trends-booklet/2013-data-trends.ashx
   Google Scholar
• Braxton, J. M., Luckey, W., & Helland, P. (Eds.). (2002). Institutionalizing a broader view of scholarship through Boyer's four domains. In ASHE-ERIC higher education report (Vol. 292). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley Periodicals.
   Google Scholar
• Braunstein, A. W. (2002). Factors determining success in a graduate business program. College Student Journal, 36, 471–477.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, G., & Edgington, R. (2008). Factors influencing word-of-mouth recommendations by MBA students: An examination of school quality, educational outcomes, and value of the MBA. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 18, 79–101.
   Google Scholar
• Comm, C. L., & Mathaisel, D. F. X. (2003). A case study of the implications of faculty workload and compensation for improving academic quality. International Journal of Educational Management, 17, 200–210.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, R. G., McGraw, M., & Mrdjenovic, J. (2006). Why do field differentials in average faculty salaries vary across universities? Economics of Education Review, 25, 241–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairweather, J. S. (2005). Beyond the rhetoric: Trends in the relative value of teaching and research. Journal of Higher Education, 76, 401–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, C. S., & Merrill, G. B. (2012). Faculty research productivity and standardized student learning outcomes in a university teaching environment: A Bayesian analysis of relationships. Studies in Higher Education, 37, 469–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Balkin, D. B. (1992). Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 921–955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAC). (2012). 2012 application trends survey report. Retrieved from http://www.gmac.com/∼/media/Files/gmac/Research/admissions-and-application-trends/2012-application-trends-survey-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gutteridge, T. G. (1973). Predicting career success of graduate business school alumni. The Academy of Management Journal, 16, 129–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, T. (1999). The gender difference: Validity of standardized admission tests in predicting MBA performance. Journal of Education for Business, 75, 91–93.
   Google Scholar
• Hossler, D. (2000). The problem with college rankings. About Campus, 5, 20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, R. D. (1996). Salary-trend studies of faculty for the years 1992–1993 and 1995–1996 in the following academic disciplines/major fields: Accounting, art, general…geology. College and University Personnel Association. Washington, DC: Appalachian Consortium, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kass, D., Grandzol, C., & Bommer, W. (2012). The GMAT as a predictor of MBA performance: Less success than meets the eye. Journal of Education for Business, 87, 290–295.
   Google Scholar
• Koys, D. (2010). GMAT versus alternatives: Predictive validity evidence from central Europe and the middle east. Journal of Education for Business, 85, 180–185.
   Google Scholar
• Kranzler, J. H., Grapin, S. L., & Daley, M. L. (2011). Research productivity and scholarly impact of APA-accredited school psychology programs: 2005–2009. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 721–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuncel, N. R., Crede, M., & Thomas, L. L. (2007). A meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the Graduate Management Admissions Test (GMAT) and undergraduate grade point average (UGPA) for graduate student academic performance. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6, 51–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melguizo, T., & Strober, M. H. (2007). Faculty salaries and the maximization of prestige. Research in Higher Education, 48, 633–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, E., & Pollack, N. F. (2007). Barron's guide to graduate business schools (15th ed.). Hauppage, NY: Barron's Educational Series, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, L. B. (1999). The impact profile approach to policy merit. Evaluation Review, 23, 212–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, I., Schmidt, F. L., Shaffer, J. A., & Le, H. (2008). The Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT) is more valid than we thought: A new development in meta-analysis and its implications for the validity of the GMAT. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 7, 563–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Princeton Review. (2013). The best 295 business schools (2014 ed.). Framingham, MA: TPR Education IP Holdings.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, S., & Jeon, Y. (2008). Reputation and efficiency: A non-parametric assessment of America's top-rated MBA programs. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(1), 245–268.
   Google Scholar
• Siegert, K. O. (2008). Executive education: Predicting student success in Executive MBA programs. Journal of Education for Business, 83, 221–226.
   Google Scholar
• Strathman, J. G. (2000). Consistent estimation of faculty rank effects in academic salary models. Research in Higher Education, 41, 237–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talento-Miller, E., & Rudner, L. M. (2005). GMAT validity study summary report for 1997 to 2004. GMAC research reports. McLean, VA: Graduate Management Admission Council.
   Google Scholar
• Talento-Miller, E., & Rudner, L. M. (2008). The validity of Graduate Management Admission Test scores: A summary of studies conducted from 1997 to 2004. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 129–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, J., & Waldfogel, J. (1997). The best business schools: A market-based approach. Journal of Business, 70, 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truell, A. D., Zhao, J. J., Alexander, M. W., & Hill, I. B. (2006). Predicting final student performance in a graduate business program: The MBA. Delti Pi Epsilon Journal, 48, 144–152.
   Google Scholar
• White, C. S., James, K., Burke, L. A., & Allen, R. S. (2012). What makes a “research star”? Factors influencing the research productivity of business faculty. International Journal of Productivity & Performance Management, 61, 584–602.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, R. E., & Palmer, J. C. (1997). Examining performance predictors for differentially successful MBA students. College Student Journal, 31, 276.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, B., & Lu, X. R. (2001). Predicting academic performance in management education: An empirical investigation of MBA success. Journal of Education for Business, 77(1), 15–20.
   Google Scholar