Self-graded homework: Some empirical tests of efficacy

References

• Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2007). Student responses to criteria-referenced self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 159–181.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, D. R., & Bean, B. (2006). GPA in research studies: An invaluable but neglected opportunity. Journal of Marketing Education, 28, 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (1989). The role of self-assessment in student grading. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 14, 20–30.
   Google Scholar
• Boyde, E. (2013, March 11). Massive open online courses: Time and a little money are a worthy investment. Financial Times. Retrieved from http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/c101d4cc-800f-11e2-96ba-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2Y6TGqKVE.
   Google Scholar
• Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Dungan, A. T., & Mundhenk, L. G. (2006). Student self-assessment: a tool for engaging management students in their learning. Teaching and Learning, 3, 54–73.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, N. M. (2007). Student self-grading in social statistics. College Teaching, 55, 72–76.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (1989). Student self-assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59, 395–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foyle, H. C. (1988, January). Homework: Suggestions for educators. Paper presented at the meeting of the Hutchinson Chapter of Phi Delta Kappa, McPherson, KS. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED294504
   Google Scholar
• Geide-Stevenson, D. (2009). Does collecting and grading homework assignments impact student achievement in an introductory economics course? Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research, 10(3), 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, W. A., & Wasserman, T. (2006). Incentives and student learning: A natural experiment with economics problem sets. American Economic Review, 96, 447–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith, N. K., Perrealt, H. R., Chin, M., & Keith, M. (2009). The effect of gender on the importance of business ethics and managerial decisions: A student perspective. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 51, 125–136.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, N., & Downs, C. (2007). Self-assessment and the disadvantaged student: Potential for encouraging self-regulated learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 475–494.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver, G. D. (2006). Absent and accounted for: Absenteeism and cooperative learning Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4, 29–49.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, F., Lin, C., & Hsu, M. (2007). Assessing gender differences in computer professionals' self-regulatory efficacy concerning information privacy practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 73, 145–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, L. (2012). Optional self-assessment: Some tensions and dilemmas. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37, 137–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahlberg, J. (2015). Formative self-assessment college classes improves self-regulation and retention in first/second year community college students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 39, 772–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVarish, J., & Solloway, S. (2002). Self-evaluation: Creating a classroom without unhealthy competitiveness. Educational Forum, 66, 253–260.
   Google Scholar
• Ohland, M. W., Loughry, M. L., Woehr, D. J., Bullard, L. G., Felder, R. M., Finelli, C. J., … Schmucker, D. G. (2012). The comprehensive assessment of team member effectiveness: Development of a behaviorally anchored rating scale for self-and peer evaluation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 609–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1998). Gender, age, and race differences on overt integrity tests: Results across four large-state job data sets. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 35–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picou, A. (2011). Does gender, GPA or age influence test performance in the introductory finance class? A study using linked questions. Review of Business Research, 11(4). Retrieved from http://www.freepatentsonline.com/article/Review-Business-Research/272616380.html
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. R. (2014). Sex & gender in ethical decision making: A critical review and recommendations for future research. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2014, 977–982.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, P. M., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self-and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11, 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, D. I. (2011). An introduction of programming using visual basic 2010. Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, D. I. (2014). An introduction of programming using visual basic 2012. Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Stefani, L. A. (1992). Comparison of collaborative self, peer and tutor assessment in a biochemistry practical. Biochemical Education, 20, 148–151.
   Google Scholar
• Strong, B., Davis, M., & Hawks, V. (2004). Self-grading in large general education classes. College Teaching, 52, 52–57.
   Google Scholar
• Terezini, P. T., Cabrera, A. F., Colbeck, C. L., Parente, J. M., & Bjorklund, S. A. (2001). Collaborative learning vs. lecture/discussion: Students' reported learning gains. Journal of Engineering Education, 90, 123–130.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, G., Pilgrim, A., & Oliver, K. (2005). Self-assessment and reflective learning for first-year geography students: A simple guide or simply misguided? Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29, 403–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vander Schee, B. A. (2011). Let them decide: student performance and self-selection of weights distribution. Journal of Education for Business, 86, 352–356.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., & Calvano, L. (2015). Is business ethics education effective? An analysis of gender, personal ethical perspectives, and moral judgment. Journal of Business Ethics, 126, 591–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar