734
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Social-motivational factors affecting business students' cheating behavior in Hong Kong and China

&

References

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Ako, J. (2011, 28 March). Unravelling plagiarism in China. US-China Today. Retrieved from http://www.uschina.usc.edu/w_usct/showarticle.aspx?articleID=16527&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1
  • Anderman, E. M., & Murdock, T. B. (Eds.). (2007). Psychology of academic cheating. London, England: Elsevier Academic Press.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bates, S. L. (2013, April 16). Global higher education: Academic integrity in China. Retrieved from http://chinese.blogs.wm.edu/2013/04/16/global-higher-education-academic-management-in-china
  • Brand, S., Felner, R., Shim, M., Seitsinger, A., & Dumas, T. (2003). Middle school improvement and reform: Development and validation of a school-level assessment of climate, cultural pluralism, and school safety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 570–588.
  • Bru, E., Stephens, P., & Torsheim, T. (2002). Students' perceptions of class management and reports of their own misbehavior. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 287–307.
  • Calabrese, R. L., & Cochran, J. T. (1990). The relationship of alienation to cheating among a sample of American adolescents. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 23, 65–72.
  • Carroll, J. (2004). Institutional issues in deterring, detecting and dealing with student plagiarism. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=9CB028C147990170BACD81BBCEE74FB8?doi=10.1.1.214.9268&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  • Chan, D. K. K. (1994). Student-teacher relationship: The student perspective. Educational Research Journal, 9, 60–64.
  • Chang, L. (2004). The role of classroom norms in contextualizing the relations of children's social behaviors to peer acceptance. Developmental Psychology, 40, 691–702.
  • Chapman, K. J., & Lupton, R. A. (2004). Academic dishonesty in a global educational market: A comparison of Hong Kong and American university business students. The International Journal of Educational Management, 18, 425–435.
  • Chen, J. J.-L. (2005, April). Perceived academic support from parents, teachers and peers: Relations to Hong Kong adolescents' academic behavior and achievement. Harvard Family Research Project. Retrieved from http://www.hfrp.org/family-involvement/publications-resources/perceived-academic-support-from-parents-teachers-and-peers-relation-to-hong-kong-adolescents-academic-behavior-and-achievement
  • Chen, X. Y., Liu, H. Y., Chang, L., & He, Y. F. (2008). Effects of the peer group on the development of social functioning and academic achievement: A longitudinal study in Chinese children. Child Development, 79, 235–251.
  • Cokley, K., Komarraju, M., Patel, N., Castillon, J., Rosales, R., Pickett, R., … Pang, L. (2004). Construction and initial validation of the student-professor interaction scale (SPIS). The College Student Affairs Journal, 24, 32–50.
  • Cokley, K., Komarraju, M., Rosales, R., Shen, F., Picket, R., & Patel, N. (2007). Assessment of quality of student-faculty interactions: A new scale of assessing the quality of student-faculty interactions. Journal of the Professoriate, 1(2), 53–67.
  • Croninger, R. G., & Lee, V. E. (2001). Social capital and dropping out of high school: Benefits to at-risk students of teachers' support and guidance. Teachers College Record, 103, 548–581.
  • Curasi, C. F. (2013). The relative influences of neutralizing behavior and subcultural values on academic dishonesty. Journal of Education for Business, 88, 167–175.
  • Davis, J. (2013). Suspicions of cheating in an online class. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Cases on emerging information technology research and applications (pp. 363–372). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
  • Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., Clark, R. E., Williams, L. E., Francis, B., & Haines, V. J. (1996). College cheating: Ten years later. Research in Higher Education, 37, 487–502.
  • Etter, S., Cramer, J. J., & Finn, S. (2006). Origins of academic dishonesty: Ethical orientations and personality factors associated with attitudes about cheating with information technology. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39, 133–155.
  • Finn, K., & Frone, M. R. (2004). Academic performance and cheating: Moderating role of school identification and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Research, 97(3), 115–123.
  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Herder and Herder.
  • Gregory, A., & Weinstein, R. S. (2004). Connection and regulation at home and in school: Predicting growth in achievement for adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 405–427.
  • Heritage Foundation. (2015). 2015 index of economic freedom. The Heritage Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.heritage.org/index
  • Hicks, L. (1997). How do academic motivation and peer relationship mix in an adolescent's world? Middle School Journal, 28, 18–22.
  • Hirschi, T. (2002). Causes of delinquency. New Brunswick, Canada: Transaction.
  • Houston, J. P. (1976). Amount and loci of classroom answer copying, spaced seating, and alternate test forms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 729–735.
  • Houston, J. P. (1983). Alternate test forms as a means of reducing multiple choice answer copying in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 572–575.
  • Howard, R. M. (2000). Sexuality, textuality: The cultural work of plagiarism. College English, 62, 473–491.
  • Jiang, H. (2007). Research of teacher–student relationship under the new curriculum. Journal of Ningbo Institute of Education, 9, 59–62.
  • Jordan, A. E. (2001). College student cheating: The role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes, and knowledge of institutional policy. Ethics and Behavior, 11, 233–247.
  • Kisamore, J. L., Stone, T. H., & Jawahar, I. M. (2007). Academic integrity: The relationship between individual and situational factors on misconduct contemplations. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 381–394.
  • Lam, M. P. (1984). Teacher–student relations. Education Journal, 12, 18–23.
  • Li, H. C., & Du, X. Y. (2013). Confronting cultural challenges when reconstructing the teacher–student relationship in a Chinese context. In M. J. Kirkebæk, X. Y. Du, & A. A. Jensen (Eds.), Teaching and learning culture: Negotiating the context (pp. 79–94). Boston, MA: Sense.
  • Liu, D. (2005). Plagiarism in ESOL students: Is cultural conditioning truly the major culprit? ELT Journal, 59, 234–241.
  • Liu, P. (2013). Perceptions of the teacher–student relationship: A study of upper elementary teachers and their students. International Education, 42(2), 21–40.
  • Lo, L. F., & Siu, L. P. (1988). Teachers' perception of a good teacher. Educational Research Journal, 3, 54–60.
  • Luo, G. (1996). Chinese traditional social and moral ideas and rules. Beijing, China: The University of Chinese People Press.
  • Lupton, R. A., Chapman, K. J., & Weiss, J. E. (2000). A cross-national exploration of business students' attitudes, perceptions, and tendencies toward academic dishonesty. Journal of Education for Business, 75, 231–235.
  • Ma, Y. C., McCabe, D. L., & Liu, R. Z. (2013). Students' academic cheating in Chinese universities: Prevalence, influencing factors, and proposed actions. Journal of Academic Ethics, 11, 169–184.
  • Ma, Z. Z. (2013). Business students' cheating in classroom and their propensity to cheat in the real world: A study of ethicality and practicality in China. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 2, 65–78.
  • Magnus, J. R., Polterovich, V. M., Danilov, D. L., & Savvateev, A. V. (2002). Tolerance of cheating: An analysis across countries. Journal of Economic Education, 33, 125–135.
  • McCabe, D., & Trevino, L. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multi-campus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38, 379–396.
  • McCabe, D., Trevino, L., & Butterfield, K. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics and Behavior, 11, 219–232.
  • McCabe, D., Trevino, L., & Butterfield, K. (2012). Cheating in college: Why students do it and what educators can do about it. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
  • McKibban, A. R., & Burdsal, C. A. (2013). Academic dishonesty: An in-depth investigation of assessing measurable constructs and a call for consistency in scholarship. Journal of Academic Ethics, 11, 185–197.
  • Murdock, T. B., Hale, N. M., & Weber, M. J. (2001). Predictors of cheating among early adolescents: Academic and social motivations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 96–115.
  • Murdock, T. B., Miller, A., & Goetzinger, A. (2007). Effects of classroom context on college students' attitudes toward academic dishonesty: Mediating and moderating influence. Social Psychology of Education, 10, 141–169.
  • Murdock, T. B., Miller, A., & Kohlhardt, J. (2004). Effects of classroom context variables on high school students' judgments of the acceptability and likelihood of cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 765–777.
  • Newhouse, R. C. (1982). Alienation and cheating behavior in the school environment. Psychology in the Schools, 19, 234–237.
  • Patrick, H., Hicks, L., & Ryan, A. M. (1997). Relations of perceived social efficacy and social goal pursuit to self-efficacy for academic work. Journal of Early Adolescence, 17, 109–128.
  • Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing others' words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 201–230.
  • Pleasance, C. (2014, June 12) 10 out of 10 for ingenuity at least: The incredible lengths Chinese students will go to cheat at high-pressure exams that will decide their whole lives. Daily Mail. Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2656298/Revealed-The-James-Bond-style-gadgets-used-pressure-Chinese-students-desperate-pass-exams-including-radio-vests-pin-hole-cameras-earpieces.html
  • Pulvers, K., & Diekhoff, G. M. (1999). The relationship between academic dishonesty and college classroom environment. Research in Higher Education, 40, 487–498.
  • Rettinger, D. A., & Kramer, Y. (2009). Situational and personal causes of student cheating. Research in Higher Education, 50, 293–313.
  • Ross, L., Green, D., & House, P. (1977). The false consensus effect: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279–301.
  • Simha, A., Armstrong, J. P., & Albert, J. F. (2012). Who leads and who lags? A comparison of cheating attitudes and behaviors among business and leadership students. Journal of Education for Business, 87, 316–324.
  • Snell, R., & Tseng, C. S. (2002). Moral atmosphere and moral influence under China's network capitalism. Organization Studies, 23, 449–478.
  • Sowden, C. (2005). Plagiarism and their culture of multilingual students in higher education abroad. ELT Journal, 59, 226–233.
  • Staats, S., Hubb, J. M., Wallace, H., & Gresley, J. (2009). Heroes don't cheat: An examination of academic dishonesty and students' views on why professors don't report cheating. Ethics and Behavior, 19, 171–183.
  • Thompson, E. R., & Gui, Q. (2000). International Perspective: The appropriateness of using Hong Kong to make inferences about business students in China. Journal of Education for Business, 76, 48–55.
  • Transparency International. (2015). Corruption perception index 2014: Results. Retrieved from http://www.transparency.org/cpi2014/results#myAnchor1
  • Wentzel, K. R. (1997). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of perceived pedagogical caring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 411–419.
  • Whitley, B. E. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education, 39, 235–274.
  • Yuan, Z. (2006). What it means to develop a new teacher–student relationship. Academic Research, 11, 113–116.
  • Zhang, D. (2012). A study on restrictive mechanism for cheating on the perspective of moral. (Unpublished master's dissertation). Jilin Financial University, Jilin (in Chinese). Retrieved from http://max.book118.com/html/2014/0531/8538243.shtm
  • Zhou, N., Lam, S. F., & Chan, K. C. (2012). The Chinese classroom paradox: A cross-cultural comparison of teacher controlling behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1162–1174.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.