Assessment of students’ learning behavior and academic misconduct in a student-pulled online learning and student-governed testing environment: A case study

References

• Abrahams, A. S., & Singh, T. (2013). Expeditionary learning in information systems: Definition, implementation, and assessment. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 11, 47–75.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C. R., Swift, C. O., & Denton, L. T. (2000). Cheating goes hi–tech: Online term paper mills. Journal of Management Education, 24, 726–740.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, D., Deck, A., & McCrickard M. (2008). Computer aided instruction: A study of student evaluations and academic performance. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 11(5), 49–57.
   Google Scholar
• Crow, K. L. (2008). Four types of disabilities: their impact on online learning. TechTrends, 52, 51–55.
   Google Scholar
• Demirkan, H., Goul, M., & Gros, M. (2010). A reference model for sustainable e–learning service systems: Experiences with the joint university/teradata consortium. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 8, 151–189.
   Google Scholar
• Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (2005). Education goes digital: The evolution of online learning and the revolution in higher education. Communications of the ACM, 48(10), 59–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction, and participation in web–based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39, 153–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, D. H., & Yoon, S. W. (2008). Team learning and collaboration between online and blended learner groups. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 21(3), 59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Manochehri, N., & Young, J. (2006). The impact of student learning styles with web–based learning or instructor–based learning on student knowledge and satisfaction. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7, 313–316.
   Google Scholar
• Mashaw, B. (2012). A model for measuring effectiveness of an online course. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 10, 189–221.
   Google Scholar
• McHaney, R. (2009). Distance learning video grid: Online teacher exchange. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 7, 457–462.
   Google Scholar
• Nemanich, L., Banks, M., & Vera, D. (2009). Enhancing knowledge transfer in classroom versus online settings: The interplay among instructor, student, content, and context. Decision Science Journal of Innovative Education, 7, 123–148.
   Google Scholar
• Neuhauser, C. (2002). Learning style and effectiveness of online and face–to–face instruction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16, 99–113.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, J., Hardcastle, L., & Richardson, B. (2009). Learning from a distance: the experience of remote students. Journal of Distance Education, 23(3), 53–74.
   Google Scholar
• Ozdemir, Z. D., & Abrevaya, J. (2007). Adoption of technology–mediated distance Education: A longitudinal analysis. Information & Management, 44, 467–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S. M. P., Ralph, D. L., & Buskirk, B. (2009). Utilizing online exams: A case study. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 6(8), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Spurr, W. A., & Bonini C. P. (1973). Statistical analysis for business decisions. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Styron, J., & Styron, R. A. Jr. (2010). Student cheating and alternative web–based assessment. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 7(5), 37–42.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, N. (2016). An online learning development and improvement cycle for an undergraduate business computer literacy course: A case study. Working Paper, College of Business Administration, California State University. Sacramento, CA: College of Business Administration, California State University.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J. H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T. L. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e–learning system environment. Computer & Education, 55, 155–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar