From Millennials to Gen Z: Changes in student attitudes about group projects

References

• Aggarwal, P., & O'Brien, C. L. (2008). Social loafing on group projects: Structural antecedents and effect on student satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education, 30(3), 255–264. doi:10.1177/0273475308322283
   Google Scholar
• Alsop, R. (2008). The trophy kids grow up: How the millennial generation is shaking up the workplace. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ashraf, M. (2004). A critical look at the use of group projects as a pedagogical tool. Journal of Education for Business, 79(4), 213–216. doi:10.3200/JOEB.79.4.213-216
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, D. R. (2016). Reporting Actual and Perceived Student Learning in Education Research. Journal of Marketing Education, 38(1), 3–6. doi:10.1177/0273475316636732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon, D. R., Stewart, K. A., & Stewart-Belle, S. (1998). Exploring predictors of student team project performance. Journal of Marketing Education, 20 (1), 63–71. doi:10.1177/027347539802000108
   Google Scholar
• Beall, G. (2017). Gen Z by the numbers. Retrieved from http://blazeadvertising.com.au/2016/08/19/gen-z-fast-facts/
   Google Scholar
• Bridgeworks (2017). Connecting with three generational segments in the workforce: A survey comparing Early Millennials, Late Millennials & Generation Z. Retrieved from: http://www.generations.com/gen-edge-report/
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, C. M., & Ammons, J. L. (2003). Free riding in group projects and the effects of timing, frequency, and specificity of criteria in peer assessments. Journal of Education for Business, 78 (5), 268–272. doi:10.1080/08832320309598613
   Google Scholar
• Burford, M. R., & Chan, K. (2017). Refining a strategic marketing course: Is a ‘flip’a good ‘fit’? Journal of Strategic Marketing, 25(2), 152–163. doi:10.1080/0965254X.2016.1182578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, S. (2005). The net generation goes to college. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(7), A34.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, K. J., & Van Auken, S. (2001). Creating positive group project experiences: An examination of the role of the instructor on students’ perceptions of group projects. Journal of Marketing Education, 23 (2), 117–127. doi:10.1177/0273475301232005
   Google Scholar
• Comer, L. B., Dubinsky, A. J., Shao, C., Chang, C. C., & Schetzsle, S. (2014). A New Approach for Teaching Customer Personality Types in the Personal Selling Course. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 14(2), 11–27.
   Google Scholar
• Cron, W. L., Marshall, G. W., Singh, J., Spiro, R. L., & Sujan, H. (2005). Salesperson selection, training, and development: Trends, implications, and research opportunities. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 25(2), 123–136.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, B. S., & Korth, S. J. (1998). A framework for learning to work in teams. Journal of Education for Business, 74(1), 28–33. doi:10.1080/08832329809601657
   Google Scholar
• Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Josuweit, A. (2018). 5 reasons Generation Z will be “Generation Smart” about College. Forbes, March 21, 2018. Retrieved from:https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewjosuweit/2018/03/21/5-reasons-generation-z-will-be-generation-smart-about-college/#7b707b267888.
   Google Scholar
• Kerin, R. A., & Hartley, S. W. (2016). Marketing: The core (6th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, D. W., & Reid, R. H. (1981). Personal Styles and Effective Performance: Make Your Style Work for You. Radnor, PA: Chilton Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Merriman, M. (2015). Rise of Gen Z: new challenge for retailers. Ernst & Young LLP, 1-12. Retrieved from https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-rise-of-gen-znew-challenge-for-retailers/%24FILE/EY-rise-of-gen-znew-challenge-for-retailers.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, K. A., & Mohr, E. S. (2017). Understanding generation Z students to promote a contemporary learning environment. Journal on Empowering Teaching Excellence, 1(1), 84–94.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, N. (2017). It’s grades, not privacy, that matter to Generation Z. Forbes, January 1, 2017, Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/nickmorrison/2017/01/16/its-grades-not-privacy-that-matter-to-generation-z/#5ba54a0f5d2d.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, K. K., & Sadaghiani, K. (2010). Millennials in the workplace: A communication perspective on millennials’ organizational relationships and performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 225–238. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9172-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of Colleges and Employers (2017). Employers rate career competencies, new hire proficiency. Retrieved from http://www.naceweb.org/career-readiness/competencies/employers-rate-career-competencies-new-hire-proficiency/
   Google Scholar
• Ng, E. S., Schweitzer, L., & Lyons, S. T. (2010). New generation, great expectations: A field study of the millennial generation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 281–292. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9159-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2016). Generation Z goes to college. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sujan, H., Weitz, B. A., & Sujan, M. (1988). Increasing sales productivity by getting salespeople to work smarter. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 8(2), 9–19.
   Google Scholar