Negotiation competence: Improving student negotiation self-efficacy

References

• Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (Vol 4, pp. 71–81). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 21–41. doi:10.1111/1467-839X.00024
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9–44. doi:10.1177/0149206311410606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, B., & Friedman, R. A. (1998). Bargainer characteristics in distributive and integrative negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 345–359. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady-Amoon, P., & Fuertes, J. N. (2011). Self-Efficacy, self-rated abilities, adjustment, and academic performance. Journal of Counseling & Development, 89(4), 431–438. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.2011.tb02840.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celuch, K., Kozlenkova, I., & Black, G. (2010). An exploration of self-efficacy as a mediator of skill beliefs and student self-identity as a critical thinker. Marketing Education Review, 20(3), 70–80. doi:10.2753/mer1052-8008200306
   Google Scholar
• Churchman, D. (1993). Negotiation tactics. Lanham, Md: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Gist, M. E., Stevens, C. K., & Bavetta, A. G. (2006). Effects of self-efficacy and post-training intervention on the acquisition and maintenance of complex interpersonal skills. Personnel Psychology, 44(4), 837–861. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00701.x
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, V., & Richards, J. (2015). Female entrepreneurs and negotiation self-efficacy: A study on negotiation skill building among women entrepreneurs. Journal of Entrepreneurial Education, 18(1), 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Lax, D., & Sebenius, J. (2006). Solve joint problems to create and claim value. Powerful tools to change the game in your most important deals (205–26). Brighton, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. (1997). Teaching negotiation and dispute resolution in colleges of business: The state of the practice. Negotiation Journal, 13(3), 253–269. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.1997.tb00131.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J. (1986). Challenges of teaching negotiation. Negotiation Journal, 2(1), 15–27. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.1986.tb00335.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. (2011). Essentials of negotiations. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Minton, J. W. (2015). Negotiation: Readings, Exercises, and Cases (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, E. W., & Maurer, T. J. (2012). Advancing validity of self-efficacy in negotiation through focusing at the domain level. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85 (1), 23–41. doi:10.1348/096317910X531744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olekalns, M., Smith, P.L., & Walsh, T. (1996). The process of negotiating: Strategy and timing as predictors of outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68(1), 68–77. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parlamis, J., & Mitchell, L.D. (2014). Teaching negotiations in the new millennium: evidence-based recommendations for online course delivery. Negotiation Journal, 30(1), 93–113. doi:10.1111/nejo.12047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, B. (2009). The deceptive simplicity of teaching negotiation: Reflections on thirty years of the negotiation workshop. Negotiation Journal, 25(4), 481–498. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2009.00240.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plumly, L., Marshall, L. L., Eastman, J., Iyer, R., Stanley, K., & Boatright, J. (2008). Developing entrepreneurial competencies: A student business. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 11, 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, B. L., & Lilly, B. (2008). Gaining confidence and competence through experiential assignments: An exploration of student self-efficacy and spectrum of inquiry. Marketing Education Review, 18(2), 55–66. Retrieved from https://lib.pepperdine.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true& db=buh&AN=34775966&login.asp?custid=s8480238&site=ehost-live&scope=site
   Google Scholar
• Sargent, C. S., Borthick, A. F., & Lederberg, A. R. (2011). Improving retention for principles of accounting students: Ultra-short online tutorials for motivating effort and improving performance. Issues in Accounting Education, 26(4), 657–679. doi:10.2308/iace-50001
   Google Scholar
• Shell, R., & Moussa, M. (2007). The Six Channels of Persuasion. The Art of Woo: Using Strategic Persuasion to Sell your Ideas, New York, NY: Penguin; p. 32–41.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, B., O’Connor, K., & Burris, E. (2006). Negotiator confidence: The impact of self-efficacy on tactics and outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(5), 567–581. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, K. A., Mesmer-Magnus, J., & Burns, T. M. (2008). Teaching the art of negotiation: Improving students’ negotiating confidence and perceptions of effectiveness. Journal of Education for Business, 83(3), 135–140. doi:10.3200/JOEB.83.3.135-140
   Google Scholar
• Volkema, R. (2007). Negotiating for money: Adding a dose of reality to classroom negotiations. Negotiation Journal, 23(4), 473–485. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2007.00159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, M. (2006). Is teaching negotiation too easy, too hard, or both? Negotiation Journal, 22(2), 187–197. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2006.00094.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, R. (2012). Three cheers for teaching distributive bargaining. Negotiation Journal, 28(1), 73–78. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2011.00326.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiu, T. W., Cheung, S. O., & Siu, L. Y. (2012). Application of Bandura’s self-efficacy theory to examining the choice of tactics in construction dispute negotiation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(3), 331–340. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar