National variation in citation-based business journal quality measures and characteristics

References

• Al-Hoorie, A. H., & Vitta, J. P. (2019). The seven sins of L2 research: A review of 30 journals’ statistical quality and their CiteScore, SJR, SNIP, JCR Impact Factors. Language Teaching Research, 23(6), 718–727. doi:10.1177/1362168818767191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, R. (1991). The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: Experimental evidence from The American Economic Review. The American Economic Review, 81(5), 1041–1067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colledge, L., de Moya-Anegón, F., Guerrero-Bote, V., López-Illescas, C., El Aisati, M., & Moed, H. (2010). SJR and SNIP: Two new journal metrics in Elsevier’s. Serials: The Journal for the Serials Community, 23(3), 215–221. doi:10.1629/23215
   Google Scholar
• Crane, D. (1967). The gatekeepers of science: Some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journals. The American Sociologist, 2(4), 195–201.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva, J. A. T., & Memon, A. R. (2017). CiteScore: A cite for sore eyes, or a valuable, transparent metric? Scientometrics, 111(1), 553–556. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2250-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Silva, P. V. K., & Vance, C. K. (2017). Measuring the impact of scientific research. In: Scientific Scholarly Communication. Spranger, Cham: Fascinating Life Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, T. M. (2013). Acceptance rates of finance journals dedicated to various areas: Impact of review type and reviewer number. Mustang Journal of Accounting and Finance, 3, 65–88.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, T. M. (2014). Paying for acceptance? A study of academic management journals. Mustang Journal of Business and Ethics, 6, 31–46.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, T. M. (2017). A comparison of CABS’ academic journal guide, Australian business deans council’s list, and cabell’s directory of publishing opportunities in finance. Journal of Financial Education, 43(2), 313–338.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, T. M., & Lelkes, A. T. (2019). Bibliometric measures and journal characteristics of leading accounting and finance journals. Journal of Accounting and Finance 19(7), 87–101.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, T. M., & Shorter, J. D. (2011). Variation in scholarly journal review processes and acceptance rates across time and disciplines. Southwestern Business Administration Journal, 11(2), 71–112.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, T. M., & Shorter, J. D. (2019). A comparison of high-quality finance journals and high-quality information systems journals. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 19(1), 95–104.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, T. M., Shorter, J. D., & Huff, K. (2012). International differences in business journal acceptance rates across business disciplines. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(3), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Okagbue, H. I., Atayero, A. A., Adamu, M. O., Bishop, S. A., Oguntunde, P. E., & Opanuga, A. A. (2018). Exploration of editorial board composition, CiteScore and percentiles of Hindawi journals indexed in Scopus. Data in Brief, 19(August), 743–752. doi:10.1016/j.dib.2018.05.066
   Google Scholar
• Pendlebury, D. (2009). The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, 57(1), 1–11. doi:10.1007/s00005-009-0008-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramin, S., & Shirazi, A. S. (2012). Comparison between Impact factor, SCImago journal rank indicator and Eigenfactor score of nuclear medicine journals. Nuclear Medicine Review, 15(2), 132–136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shorter, J. D. (2013). Distinctions in academic journal review processes and acceptance rates across time & how time to review, manuscript length, and sponsorship effect periodical acceptance rates in the information systems disciplines. Journal of Information Systems Technology & Planning, 5(15), 87–111.
   Google Scholar
• Shorter, J. D., Krueger, T. M., & Chatelain-Jardon, R. (2012). Discipline, nation, and time based differences in business journal acceptance rates and review processes. Journal of International Business Management & Research, 3(7), 147–163.
   Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, R. T. (2007). Editorial: Single-versus double-blind reviewing. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 32(1), 1–29. doi:10.1145/1206049.1206050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugimoto, C. R., Lariviere, V., Ni, C., & Cronin, B. (2013). Journal acceptance rates: A cross-disciplinary analysis of variability and relationships with journal measures. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 897–906. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar