CxO advisory councils: New approaches in executive education

References

• AACSB International. (2008). Final report of the AACSB international impact of research task force. Retrieved from https://www.aacsb.edu/-/media/aacsb/publications/research-reports/impact-of-research.ashx?la=en&hash=1B11EFEF16F3694F0FDB1A3DD4D6E4301DF7DC28.
   Google Scholar
• Andrus, D. M., & Martin, D. (2001). The development and management of a department of marketing advisory council. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(3), 216–227. doi:10.1177/0273475301233007
   Google Scholar
• Basias, N., & Pollalis, Y. (2018). Quantitative and qualitative research in business & technology: Justifying a suitable research methodology. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 7, 91–105.
   Google Scholar
• Beeson, J. (2010). The unwritten rules: The six skills you need to get promoted to the executive level. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Economist (2010, June 24). Too many chiefs. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/business/2010/06/24/too-many-chiefs
   Google Scholar
• Ellingson, D. A., Elbert, D. J., & Moser, S. (2010). Advisory councils for business colleges: Composition and utilization. American Journal of Business Education, 3(1), 1–8. doi:10.19030/ajbe.v3i1.361
   Google Scholar
• Felsen, D., & Nastanski, M. (2016). The process of stakeholder engagement: The case of establishing advisory councils at a school of business. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 9(4), 655–667.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, P. (2019). Making the most of your business advisory council. AACSB Blog. Retrieved from https://www.aacsb.edu/blog/2019/february/making-the-most-of-your-business-advisory-council
   Google Scholar
• Gable, C., & Shireman, B. (2005). Stakeholder engagement: A three-phase methodology. Environmental Quality Management, 14(3), 9–24. doi:10.1002/tqem.20044
   Google Scholar
• Goudreau, J. (2012). C is for silly: The new C-suite titles. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/jennagoudreau/2012/01/10/c-is-for-silly-the-new-c-suite-titles/#681088b2a010
   Google Scholar
• Groysberg, B., Kelly, L. K., & MacDonald, B. (2011). The new path to the C-suite. Harvard Business Review, 89(3), 60–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groysberg, B. (2014, March 18). The seven skills you need to thrive in the C-suite. Harvard Business Review Magazine. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2014/03/the-seven-skills-you-need-to-thrive-in-the-c-suite?autocomplete=true
   Google Scholar
• Guadalupe, M., Li, H., & Wulf, J. (2014). Who lives in the C-suite? Organizational structure and the division of labor in top management. Management Science, 60(4), 824–844. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2013.1795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoke, F., & Jobe, M. E. (1973). Career education advisory councils: A plan for development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED099597).
   Google Scholar
• Kaupins, G., & Coco, M. (2002). Administrator perceptions of business school advisory boards. Education, 123(2), 351–357.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Little, M. W., Tuckman, H., & Humphrey, R. (2000). Marketing for involvement and advocacy: Business advisory boards–a case study. Journal of Professional Services Marketing, 21(1), 117–124. doi:10.1300/J090v21n01_08
   Google Scholar
• Mandviwalla, M., Fadem, B., Goul, M., George, J. F., & Hale, D. P. (2015). Achieving academic-industry collaboration with departmental advisory boards. MIS Quarterly Executive, 14(1), 17–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Milena, Z. R., Dainora, G., & Alin, S. (2008). Qualitative research methods: A comparison between focus-group and in-depth interview. Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 17(4), 1279–1283.
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K.A. (2019). Content analysis and thematic analysis. In P. Brough (Ed.), Research methods for applied psychology (pp. 211–223). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, C. S., & Bagranoff, N. A. (2019). Accounting advisory councils: Engagement between practice and academe. Advances in Accounting Education: Teaching and Curriculum Innovations, 23, 133–151.
   Google Scholar
• Orwin, R. G., & Vevea, J. L. (2009). Evaluating coding decisions. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 177–203). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Page, S. E. (2007). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools and societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parvatiyar, A., & Sheth, J. (2000). The domain and conceptual foundations of relationship marketing. In J. Sheth & A. Parvatiyar (Eds.), The handbook of relationship marketing (pp. 3–38). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Query, J. T. (2018). Actuarial science advisory boards: A survey of current and best practices. Journal of Education for Business, 93(8), 403–411. doi:10.1080/08832323.2018.1496896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renfors, S. M. (2020). Identificatinn of ecopreneurs’ business competencies for training program development. Journal of Education for Business, 95(1), 1–9. doi:10.1080/08832323.2019.1595501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, K. J., & Stiefer, T. W. (2013). Advisory councils in executive education: Insights from practice. Journal of Executive Education, 12(1), 3.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, B. (2015). When will it end? The rise of “chief whatever officer” roles and why they are nonsense. Information Age Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.information-age.com/when-will-it-end-rise-chief-whatever-officer-roles-and-why-they-are-nonsense-123459866/
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Same Day Transcriptions (n.d). Fields of specialization. Retrieved from https://www.samedaytranscriptions.com/interview-transcription-services/
   Google Scholar
• Svejenova, S., & Alvarez, J. L. (2017). Changing the c-suite: New chief officer roles as strategic responses to institutional complexity. In G. Krucken, C. Mazza, R. E. Meyer, & P. Walgenbach (Eds.), New themes in institutional analysis: Topics and issues from European research (pp. 135–161). Cheltenham Glos, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Thurmond, V. A. (2001). The point of triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship : An Official Publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 33(3), 253–258. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00253.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, H. J., Castresana, A., Clark, J., & Munguia, L. (2015). Building boards. BizEd, 14(6), 18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Winsor, J. L., Curtis, D. B., Graves, J., & Heck, S. (1992). Establishing professional advisory councils for communication programs. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED352692).
   Google Scholar
• Yeaton, W. H., & Wortman, P. M. (1993). On the reliability of meta-analytic reviews: The role of intercoder agreement. Evaluation Review, 17(3), 292–309. doi:10.1177/0193841X9301700303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar