A data-driven approach for discovery of the latest research trends in higher education for business by leveraging advanced technology and big data

References

• American Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB). (1996). Achieving quality and continuous improvement through self-evaluation and peer review. Accreditation Handbook of the American Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business. St Louis, MO: AACSB.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Atteveldt, W. V. (2008). Semantic network analysis: Techniques for extracting, representing, and querying media content. Charleston SC: BookSurge Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Banta, T., Land, J., Black, K., & Olander, F. (1996). Assessment in practice: Putting principles to work on college campuses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M., & Henkel, M. (1997). Responses of academe to quality reforms in higher education: A comparative study of England and Sweden. Tertiary Education and Management, 3(3), 211–228. doi:10.1080/13583883.1997.9966924
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (2001). The reflective institution: Assuring and enhancing the quality of teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41(3), 221–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(2003), 993–1022.
   Google Scholar
• CABS. (2019, March). The changing shape of business education provision. Chartered Association of Business Schools, Carringtoncrisp. Retrieved from https://charteredabs.org/publications/the-changing-shape-of-business-education-provision/.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, W. S. (2017). A study on the research trend of western music theory and analysis in the Korean Journal of Musicology, 2006–2015. Music Theory Forum, 24(2), 159–205. doi:10.15571/MTF.2017.24.2.159.
   Google Scholar
• Cyram NetMiner. (2019). NetMiner semantic network analysis manual. Cyram. Retrieved from https://www.NetMiner.Com.
   Google Scholar
• Dias, L., & Shah, A. (2008). Introduction to business. Career Education (1st ed., January 25, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Doerfel, M. L. (1998). What constitutes semantic network analysis? A comparison of research and methodologies. Connections, 21(2), 16–26.
   Google Scholar
• Drieger, P. (2013). Semantic network analysis as a method for visual text analytics. 9th Conference on Applications of Social Network Analysis (ASNA). Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 79(2013), 4–17. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.05.053
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D. E., & Brannen, D. E. (1990). Current status of outcomes assessment at the MBA level. Journal of Education for Business, 65(5), 206–212. doi:10.1080/08832323.1990.10117428.
   Google Scholar
• Executive Core. (2015, Summer). Future trends in business education. Executive Core, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.uniconexed.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Future_Trends-Revised_Final_Report_Executive_Core-August-Jan.12.2016-v2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, J. (2019). Key trends influencing graduate business education in 2019. Retrieved from https://www.mba.com/article-and-announcements/articles/why-business-school/key-trends-influencing-graduate-business-education-in.
   Google Scholar
• Iniguez, S. (2015). Major trends in business education. MBA Journal, 12, 16. Retrieved from https://www.mba -journal.de/major-trends-in-business-education.
   Google Scholar
• Kharlamov, A., Gradoselskaya, G., & Dokuka, S. (2017). Dynamic semantic network analysis of unstructured text corpora. International Conference on Analysis of Images, Social Networks and Texts (AIST 2017, pp. 392–403).
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. M. (2015). Analysis of research trends of South Korean music education through semantic network analysis. Korean Journal of Research in Music Education, 44(4), 49–68. http://210.101.116.28/W_files/kiss5/24400648_pv.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, N. D, & SNU Consumer Trend Analysis Center. (2019). Trends Korea 2020. Seoul, Korea: Futuristic window (Milaeui Chang).
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M., Choi, M., & Youm, Y. (2017). Semantic network analysis of online news and social media text related to comprehensive nursing care service. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 47(6), 806–816. doi:10.4040/jkan.2017.47.6.806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, N. J. (2017). Text mining tutorial. Group Processes (Part of the Computational Social Sciences book series (CSS)), (pp. 93–117). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48941-4_5.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Choi, J. H., & Kim, H.W. (2010). Semantic network analysis on the MIS research keywords: APJIS and MIS Quarterly 2005–2009. Asian Pacific Journal of Information System, 20(4), 25–51.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, D. (2019). Trends in technology: How we work, live and consume. USA Trends Day Keynote. Retrieved from https://www.daniellevine.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, S. (2019). Top 3 MBA trends in 2019. Hiperpool. Retrieved from https://hiperpool.com/blog/top-3-mba-trends.
   Google Scholar
• Monge, P. R., & Eisenberg, E. M. (1987). Emergent communication networks. Handbook of organizational communication, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nikitina, T., & Lapina, I. (2017). Overview of trends and developments in business education. The 21st World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics: WMSCI 2017, Vol.2, USA, Orlando.
   Google Scholar
• Nomuoja, J. O. (2010). Current trends in business education in higher institutions. Retrieved from http://www.globalacademicgroup.com/journals/the%20nigerian%20academic%20forum/Jude%20O%20Nomuoja%204.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nulty, P. (2017). Semantic network analysis of contested political concepts. International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS 2017). Retrieved from http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W/W17/#6800.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019). Trends shaping education 2019 spotlight 18 Play! Paris: OEDC Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Y. E, Management Department, College of Business Administration, Prince Sultan University. (2019). Data empowered insights for sustainability of Korean MNEs. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(3), 173–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitan, O.S., & Muller, C. (2019). University reputation and undergraduates' self-perceived employability: Mediating influence of experiential learning activities. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(6), 1269–1284. doi:10.1080/07294360.2019.1634678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, L., & Kirkwood, A. (2014). Using technology for teaching and learning in higher education: A critical review of the role of evidence in informing practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(3), 549–564. doi:10.1080/07294360.2013.841643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, R. E. (2005). New media/internet research topics of the association of Internet research. The Information Society, 21(4), 285–299. doi:10.1080/01972240500189232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, R. E., & Danowski, J. A. (1991). Comparing comments and semantic networks about voicemail. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science, 28, 134–138.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, C. W., & Ho, J. T. (2020). Technology-enhanced learning in higher education: A bibliometric analysis with latent semantic approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106177. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.106177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steyvers, M., & Griffiths, T. (2007). Probabilistic topic models. In T. K. Landauer, D. S. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 427–448). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J.B. (2005). The large-scale structure of semantic networks: Statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth. Cognitive Science, 29(1), 41–78. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2901_3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stohl, C. (1993). European managers' interpretations of participation: A semantic network analysis. Human Communication Research, 20(1), 97–117. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00317.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2002). Constructing knowledge societies: New challenges for tertiary education. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. (2018). Methodology review, Part2: Text mining, and semantic network analysis. Retrieved from https://jaredmwr.wordpress.com/2018/03/13/methodology-review-part-2-text-mining-and-semantic-network-analysis/.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, F. G. K., & Keser, H. (2016). The impact of reflective thinking activities in e-learning: A critical review of the empirical research. Computers & Education, 95, 163–173. 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, E., & Park, Y. (2018). Extraction of scientific semantic networks from science textbooks and comparison with science teachers' spoken language by text network analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 40(17), 2118–2136. 10.1080/09500693.2018.1521536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zainuddin, Z., & Halili, S. H. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(3), 313–340. 10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2274.
   Google Scholar
• Zaki, M. J., & Meira, W. (2014). Data Mining and Analysis: Fundamental Concepts and Algorithms. London, LD: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar