Mutatis mutandis: An abstraction with reusable building block used to teach business process modeling

References

• Ayora, C., Torres, V., & Pelechano, V. (2011). Variability management in business process models. Technical report. Valencia: Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, P. H. (2002). Information technology is out – Knowledge sharing is in. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 13(4), 73–77. doi:10.1002/jcaf.10072
   Google Scholar
• Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. M. (1994). Design patterns: Elements of reusable object-oriented software (1st ed.). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Professional.
   Google Scholar
• Hadar, I., & Hadar, E. (2007). An iterative methodology for teaching object oriented concepts. Informatics in Education, 6(1), 67–80. doi:10.15388/infedu.2007.05
   Google Scholar
• Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., & Reichert, M. (2010). Capturing variability in business process models: The provop approach. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 22(6–7), 519–546. doi:10.1002/smr.491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrabala, M., Opletalova, M., & Tucek, D. (2017). Teaching business process management: Improving the process of process modelling course. Istrazivanja i Projektovanja za Privredu, 15(2), 113–121. doi:10.5937/jaes15-12172
   Google Scholar
• Jasimuddin, S. M., Connell, N., & Klein, J. H. (2012). Knowledge transfer frameworks: An extension incorporating knowledge repositories and knowledge administration. Information Systems Journal, 22(3), 195–209. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2011.00382.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kossak, F., Illibauer, C., Geist, V., Kubovy, J., Natschläger, C., Ziebermayr, T., … Schewe, K. D. (2014). A rigorous semantics for BPMN 2.0 process diagrams (1st ed.). London, UK: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• La Rosa, M., van der Aalst, W. M. P., Dumas, M., & Milani, F. P. (2018). Business process variability modeling: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 50(1), 1–45. doi:10.1145/3041957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. W., Daly, S. R., Huang-Saad, A., Rodriguez, G., & Seifert, C. M. (2020). Cognitive strategies in solution mapping: How engineering designers identify problems for technological solutions. Design Studies, 71, 100967. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2020.100967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Z. (2013). Process fragments: Enhancing reuse of process logic in BPEL process models (PhD thesis). Universität Stuttgart. http://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/3035
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Ruiz, T., Münch, J., García, F., & Piattini, M. (2012). Requirements and constructors for tailoring software processes: A systematic literature review. Software Quality Journal, 20(1), 229–260. doi:10.1007/s11219-011-9147-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OMG (2014, January). Business process model and notation (BPMN), version 2.0.2. http://www.omg.org/oceb-2/
   Google Scholar
• Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation (p. 282). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN: 978-0470-87641-1.
   Google Scholar
• Runeson, P., Höst, M., Rainer, A., & Regnell, B. (2012). Case study research in software engineering: Guidelines and examples (1st ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Schumm, D., Karastoyanova, D., Kopp, O., Leymann, F., Sonntag, M., & Strauch, S. (2011). Process fragment libraries for easier and faster development of process-based applications. Journal of Systems Integration, 2(1), 39–55. doi:10.20470/jsi.v2i1.83
   Google Scholar
• Schumm, D., Leymann, F., Ma, Z., Scheibler, T., & Strauch, S. (2010). Integrating compliance into business processes: Process fragments as reusable compliance controls. In MKWI'10.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhatalo, J., Völzer, H., & Koehler, J. (2009). The refined process structure tree. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 68(9), 793–818. doi:10.1016/j.datak.2009.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 42(2), 186–204.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zemni, M. A., Mammar, A., & Hadj-Alouane, N. B. (2016). An automated approach for merging business process fragments. Computers in Industry, 82, 104–118. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2016.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar