180
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Innovative Instructional Classroom Projects/Best Practices

Student engagement in online graduate entrepreneurship classes: Demonstrating meeting AACSB standards

&

References

  • AACSB (2013). Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation. Tampa, FL: AACSB.
  • AACSB (2020). 2020 Guiding principles and standards for business accreditation. Tampa, FL: AACSB.
  • Adler, K. M. (2020). Determining Carnegie units: Student engagement in online courses without a residentential equivalent. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 23(1), 1–10. Retrieved from https://www.westga.edu/∼distance/ojdla/spring231/adler231.html
  • Ahmad, A. S., Zhou, S., & Ayers, T. (2020). The future of learning: Teaching industrial and organizational psychology in all modalities. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 13(4), 540–543. doi:10.1017/iop.2020.105
  • Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). How classroom environment and student engagement affect learning in internet-based MBA courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 63(4), 9–26.
  • Arbaugh, J. B., Fornaciari, C. J., & Hwang, A. (2016). Identifying research topic development in business and management education research using legitimation code theory. Journal of Management Education, 40(6), 654–691. doi:10.1177/1052562916631109
  • Brawer, F. B. (1997). Simulation as a vehicle in entrepreneurship education. ERIC Digest, 97–91, 433–469.
  • Brink, K. E., Palmer, T. B., & Costigan, R. D. (2018). Business school learning goals: Alignment with evidence-based models and accreditation standards. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(4), 474–491. doi:10.1017/jmo.2017.35
  • Brocato, B. R., Bonanno, A., & Ulbig, S. (2015). Student perceptions and instructional evaluations: A multivariate analysis of online and face-to-face classroom settings. Education and Information Technologies, 20(1), 37–55. doi:10.1007/s10639-013-9268-6
  • Craig, R. (2016, November 6). A brief history (and future) of online degrees. Forbes. Retrieved February 20, 2020, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/ryancraig/2015/06/23/a-brief-history-and-future-of-online-degrees/#145495aa48d9
  • Fulton, C. (2020). Collaborating in online teaching: Inviting e-guests to facilite learning in the digital environment. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(7/8), 579–585. doi:10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0116
  • Hillman, D. C., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30–42. doi:10.1080/08923649409526853
  • Hommel, U., & Woods, B. (2021). Squeezing the middle: The consequences of quality oversight in management education. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(1), 96–114. doi:10.1007/s13132-018-0559-4
  • Hostager, T. J. (2014). Online learning resources do make a difference: Mediating effects of resource utilization on course grades. Journal of Education for Business, 89(6), 324–332. doi:10.1080/08832323.2014.905765
  • Indiana University for Postsecondary Research (2003). National survey of student engagement: The college student report. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
  • International Affairs Office, U. S. Department of Education (2008). Structure of the U. S. education system: Credit systems. Retrieved from U. S. Department of Education www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ous/international/usnei/us/credits.doc
  • Isabelle, D. A. (2020). Gamification of entrepreneurship education. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 18(2), 203–223. doi:10.1111/dsji.12203
  • Jacobi, M., Astin, A., & Ayala, F. Jr. (1987). College student outcomes assessment. Washington, DC: Clearinghouse on Higher Education.
  • Kuh, G. (2003). What we're learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35(2), 24–31. doi:10.1080/00091380309604090
  • Kuratko, D. F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 577–597. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00099.x
  • Lancellotti, M., Thomas, S., & Kohli, C. (2016). Online video modules for improvement in student learning. Journal of Education for Business, 91(1), 19–22. doi:10.1080/08832323.2015.1108281
  • Neck, H. M., & Greene, P. G. (2011). Entrepreneurship education: Known worlds and new frontiers. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 55–70. doi:10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00314.x
  • Peltier, J. W., Schibrowsky, J. A., & Drago, W. (2007). The interdependence of the factors influencing the perceived quality of the online learning experience: A causal model. Journal of Marketing Education, 29(2), 140–153. doi:10.1177/0273475307302016
  • Pokrovskaia, N. N., Leontyeva, V. L., Ababkova, M. Y., Cappelli, L., & D’Ascenzo, F. (2021). Digital communication tools and knowledge creation processes for enriched intellectural outcome – Experience of short-term E-learning courses during pandemic. Future Internet, 13(2), 43. doi:10.3390/fi13020043
  • Powell, K., Helm, S. J., Layne, M., & Ice, P. (2012). Quantifying online learning contact hours. Administrative Issues Journal, 2(2), 80–93. doi:10.5929/2012.2.2.7
  • Quality Matters (2021, January). Course reviews. Retrieved May 2, 2021, from Quality Matters https://www.qualitymatters.org/reviews-certifications/course-design-reviews
  • Robinson, C. C., & Hullinger, H. (2008). New benchmarks in higher education: Student engagement in online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 84(2), 101–108. doi:10.3200/JOEB.84.2.101-109
  • Shurville, S., & Rospigliosi, A. (2009). Implementing blended self-managed action learning for digital entrepreneurs in higher education. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 6(1), 53–61. doi:10.1080/14767330902731335
  • Sun, Q., & Ganesh, G. (2014). Developing and teaching an online MBS marketing research class: Implications for online learning effectiveness. Journal of Education for Business, 89(7), 337–345. doi:10.1080/08832323.2013.806885
  • TPR Education IP Holdings, LLC (2021). Top 50 Entrepreneurship: Grad. Retrieved May 1, 2021, from The Princeton Review https://www.princetonreview.com/business-school-rankings?rankings=top-50-entrepreneurship-grad
  • Yin, R. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.