Development of complex thinking in a professional training process: An approach to business students of a Mexican University

References

• Alfaro-Ponce, B., Patiño, A., & Sanabria-Z, J. (2023). Components of computational thinking in citizen science games and its contribution to reasoning for complexity through digital game-based learning: A framework proposal. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2191751. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2191751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfaro-Ponce, B., Sanabria-Z, J., Rivero-Zambrano, L. F., & Muñoz-Ibáñez, C. A. (2023). Citizen science’s influence on public policy for addressing complexity: A systematic review of tech-based projects in higher education. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 14(1), 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Alley, H. (2020). Scientific thinking: get the results you want. Canada’s Industrial Journal. Plant, 79(3), 20.
   Google Scholar
• Artha, D., Sulisworo, D., Jumandi, J., & Istiyono, E. (2021). STEM ISCIT learning tools to improve integrative scientific thinking. IRIP Indonesian Review of Physics, 4(2), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.12928/irip.v4i2.5265
   Google Scholar
• Bandyopadhyay, S., & Szostek, J. (2019). Thinking critically about critical thinking: Assessing critical thinking of business students using multiple measures. Journal of Education for Business, 94(4), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2018.1524355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco-Gutierrez, I., Esteve, P., & Zubelzu, S. (2022). Combining technical and business studies at the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid: Analysis of the Double Degree student profile. Advances in Building Education, 6(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.20868/abe.2022.1.4813
   Google Scholar
• Cruz-Sandoval, M., Vázquez-Parra, J. C., & Carlos-Arroyo, M. (2023). Complex thinking and social entrepreneurship. An approach from the methodology of compositional data analysis. Heliyon, 9(2), e13415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz-Sandoval, M., Vázquez-Parra, J. C., Carlos-Arroyo, M., & Del Angel-González, M. V. (2023). Complex thinking and its relevance in professional training: An approach to engineering students in a Mexican University. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 13(3), 100–119. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v13i3.36885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, L., Zhu, Y., Qu, J., Tie, L., Wang, Z., & Qu, B. (2021). Psychometric properties of the critical thinking disposition assessment test amongst medical students in China: A cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02437-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker, J. (2021). Sustainability and complexity: Knowledge and authority in the digital humanities. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 36(Suppl_2), ii86–ii94. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqab025
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, G. (2023). A personalized teaching signature: Finding your unique profile as a business educator. Business Horizons, 66(2), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2022.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2002). Learning in a constellation of interconnected practices: Canon or dissonance? Journal of Management Studies, 39(4), 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.t01-1-00298
   Google Scholar
• Hermelingmeier, V., & von Wirth, T. (2021). The nexus of business sustainability and organizational learning: A systematic literature review to identify key learning principles for business transformation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 1839–1851. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooman, E., & Mohammad, G. N. (2022). The role of cognitive and demographic profile of future managers on product elimination decisions. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 24(2), 365–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaaron, A. A. M., & Backhouse, C. J. (2018). Operationalisation of service innovation: A systems thinking approach. The Service Industries Journal, 38(9-10), 561–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2017.1411480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koerber, S., & Osterhaus, C. (2019). Individual differences in early scientific thinking: Assessment, cognitive influences, and their relevance for science learning. Journal of Cognition and Development, 20(4), 510–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2019.1620232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, J., & Wrigley, C. (2017). Design and design thinking in business and management higher education. Journal of Learning Design, 10(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v9i3.294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (2004). Leadership and management development: An afterword. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(3), 140–142. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2004.14776190
   Google Scholar
• Pacheco-Velázquez, E. A., Vázquez-Parra, J. C., Cruz-Sandoval, M., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., & Carlos-Arroyo, M. (2023). Business decision-making and complex thinking: A bibliometric study. Administrative Sciences, 13(3), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13030080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2017). A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rehman Shabli, A. (2020). Coaching as an effective method of shaping the professional profile of employees in the business. Instituto Politécnica de Braganca.
   Google Scholar
• RStudio Team. (2016). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. RStudio, Inc. http://www.rstudio.com/
   Google Scholar
• Schon, D. A. (1996). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sotelo, D., Vázquez-Parra, J. C., Cruz-Sandoval, M., & Sotelo, C. (2023). Lab-Tec@Home: Technological innovation in control engineering education with impact on complex thinking competency. Sustainability, 15(9), 7598. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobón, S., & Luna-Nemecio, J. (2021). Complex thinking and sustainable social development: validity and reliability of the COMPLEX-21 scale. Sustainability, 13(12), 6591. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vázquez-Parra, J. C., Alfaro-Ponce, B., Guerrero-Escamilla, J. B., & Morales-Maure, L. (2023). Cultural imaginaries and complex thinking: Impact of cultural education on the development of perceived achievement of complex thinking in undergraduates. Social Sciences, 12(5), 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12050272
   Google Scholar
• Vázquez-Parra, J. C., Carlos-Arroyo, M., & Cruz-Sandoval, M. (2023). Social entrepreneurship and complex thinking: Validation of SEL4C methodology for scaling the perception of achieved competency. Education Sciences, 13(2), 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A., Kennedy, S., Philipp, F., & Whiteman, G. (2017). Systems thinking: A review of sustainability management research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 866–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, D. F. (1989). The box plot: A simple visual method to interpret Data. Annals of Internal Medicine, 110(11), 916. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-110-11-916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Q. (2021). RETRACTED: Development of creative thinking skills through aesthetic creativity in middle school educational music course. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 100825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar