Examining the gender and minority test score gap on the MFT-B: A Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition approach

References

• Balart, P., & Oosterveen, M. (2019). Females show more sustained performance during test-taking than males. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11691-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bagamery, B. D., Lasik, J. J., & Nixon, D. R. (2005). Determinants of success on the ETS Business Major Field Exam for students in an undergraduate multisite regional university business program. Journal of Education for Business, 81(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.81.1.55-64
   Google Scholar
• Bean, D. F., & Bernardi, R. A. (2002). Performance on the Major Field Test in Business: The explanatory power of SAT scores and gender. Journal of Private Enterprise, 17(2), 172–178.
   Google Scholar
• Bielinska-Kwapisz, A., Brown, F. W., & Semenik, R. (2012a). Interpreting standardized assessment test scores and setting performance goals in the context of student characteristics: The case of the Major Field Test in Business. Journal of Education for Business, 87(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2010.542504
   Google Scholar
• Bielinska-Kwapisz, A., Brown, F. W., & Semenik, R. (2012b). Is higher better? Determinants and comparisons of performance on the Major Field Test in Business. Journal of Education for Business, 87(3), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2011.582897
   Google Scholar
• Bielinska-Kwapisz, A., & Brown, F. W. (2013). Differential gender performance on the major field test–business. Journal of Education for Business, 88(3), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2012.666296
   Google Scholar
• Black, H. T., & Duhon, D. L. (2003). Evaluating and improving student achievement in business programs: The effective use of standardized assessment tests. Journal of Education for Business, 79(2), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320309599095
   Google Scholar
• Blinder, A. S. (1973). Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural estimates. The Journal of Human Resources, 8(4), 436–455. https://doi.org/10.2307/144855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bycio, P., & Allen, J. S. (2007). Factors associated with performance on the educational testing service (ETS) major field achievement test in business (MFAT-B). Journal of Education for Business, 82(4), 196–201. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.82.4.196-201
   Google Scholar
• Contreras, S., Badua, F., Chen, J. S., & Adrian, M. (2011). Documenting and explaining major field test results among undergraduate students. Journal of Education for Business, 86(2), 64–70.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, A., Fawcett, K., Szűcs, D., & Dowker, A. (2012). Gender differences in mathematics anxiety and the relation to mathematics performance while controlling for test anxiety. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-8-33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbs, M. E., Nonis, S. A. Using the ETS Major Field Test In Business: Impact of test taking motivation. In Marketing Management Association 2002 Educators’ Conference Proceedings (p. 66).
   Google Scholar
• Erkan, A. (2011). Effects of social capital on academic success: A narrative synthesis. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(6), 456–461.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. J., Stone, C. C., & Zegeye, A. (2014). The major field test in business: A solution to the problem of assurance of learning assessment? Journal of Education for Business, 89(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2012.749206
   Google Scholar
• Israel, G. D., Beaulieu, L. J., & Hartless, G. (2009). The influence of family and community social capital on educational achievement. Rural Sociology, 66(1), 43–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2001.tb00054.x
   Google Scholar
• Israel, G. D., & Beaulieu, L. J. (2004). Laying the foundation for employment: The role of social capital in educational achievement. Review of Regional Studies, 34(3), 260–287. https://doi.org/10.52324/001c.8392
   Google Scholar
• Jann, B. (2008). The Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition for linear regression models. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 8(4), 453–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0800800401
   Google Scholar
• Ketcham, D., Nigro, P., & Roberto, M. (2018). Do persistence and passion matter: Evidence from the educational testing service major field test in business. Journal of Education for Business, 93(3), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2018.1425284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keiser, H. N., Sackett, P. R., Kuncel, N. R., & Brothen, T. (2016). Why women perform better in college than admission scores would predict: Exploring the roles of conscientiousness and course-taking patterns. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(4), 569–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, J., Settlage, D. M., & Wollscheid, J. R. (2021). Analyzing knowledge decay and gender differences on end of program assessment measures: Case of a Mid-South University in the USA. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(2), 100465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, P. M., Coleman, B. J., Steagall, J. W., Gallo, A. A., & Fabritius, M. M. (2011). The use of the ETS Major Field Test for assurance of business content learning: Assurance of waste? Journal of Education for Business, 86(2), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2010.480988
   Google Scholar
• Mirchandani, D., Lynch, R., & Hamilton, D. (2001). Using the ETS major field test in business: Implications for assessment. Journal of Education for Business, 77(1), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320109599671
   Google Scholar
• Nigro, P., Beaudin, L., Ketcham, D., & Roberto, M. (2021). Does student performance in introductory economics and business courses impact ETS scores? Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 25(1), 35–57.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (2001). Social capital: Measurement and consequences. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1), 41–51.
   Google Scholar
• Reardon, S. F., Kalogrides, D., Fahle, E. M., Podolsky, A., & Zárate, R. C. (2018). The relationship between test item format and gender achievement gaps on math and ELA tests in fourth and eighth grades. Educational Researcher, 47(5), 284–294.
   Google Scholar
• Rupasingha, A., Goetz, S. J., & Freshwater, D. (2006). The production of social capital in US counties. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Settlage, D. M., & R. J. Wollscheid (2015). Analyzing student performance in specific subject area indicators on the ETS major field test in business. Journal of Education for Business, 90(6), 322–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2015.1058736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannery, F., & Mondal, S. (2017). College academic performance and external assessment: Has the relationship changed? Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 17(2), 36–53.
   Google Scholar
• Terry, N., Mills, L., & Sollosy, M. (2008). Student grade motivation as a determinant of performance on the business Major Field ETS exam. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 5(7), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v5i7.1244
   Google Scholar
• Terry, N., Mills, L., Rosa, D., & Sollosy, M. (2009). Do online students make the grade on the business major field ETS exam? Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 13(4), 109.
   Google Scholar
• Truell, A. D., Alexander, M. W., Zhao, J. J., & Lazaros, E. J. (2018). Analyzing student ETS major field test in business (ETS-MFTB) student performance scores at an AACSB accredited institution: predicting and explaining the influence of participating in online courses. Issues in Information Systems, 19(1), 203–209.
   Google Scholar
• Weichselbaumer, D., & Winter‐Ebmer, R. (2005). A meta‐analysis of the international gender wage gap. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(3), 479–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0950-0804.2005.00256.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeis, C., Waronska, A., & Fuller, R. (2009). Value-added program assessment using nationally standardized tests: Insights into internal validity issues. Journal of Academy of Business and Economics, 9(1), 114–128.
   Google Scholar
• Zwick, R., & Greif Green, J. (2007). New perspectives on the correlation of SAT scores, high school grades, and socioeconomic factors. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2007.00025.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwick, R., & Himelfarb, I. (2011). The effect of high school socioeconomic status on the predictive validity of SAT scores and high school grade‐point average. Journal of Educational Measurement, 48(2), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2011.00136.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar