When Oprah Intervenes: Political Correlates of Daytime Talk Show Viewing

References

• Abt , V. and Seesholtz , M. 1994 . The shameless world of Phil, Sally and Oprah: Television talk shows and the deconstructing of society. . Journal of Popular Culture , 28 : 195 – 215 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin , E. W. and Dong , Q. 1994 . Source v. content effects on judgments on news believability. . Journalism Quarterly , 71 : 973 – 983 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner , F. R. and Jones , B. D. 2002 . “ Positive and negative feedback in politics. ” . In Policy dynamics , Edited by: Baumgartner , F. R. and Jones , B. D. 3 – 28 . Chicago : University of Chicago Press .
   Google Scholar
• Collins , M. 2003, March 11 . “ Television; savage makeover; the left is a casualty as MSNBC gears up for war. ” . In The Boston Herald 37
   Google Scholar
• Converse , P. E. and Marcus , G. 1979 . A dynamic simultaneous equations model of electoral choice. . American Political Science Review , 73 : 1055 – 1070 .
   Google Scholar
• Davis , R. and Owen , D. 1998 . New media and American politics. , New York : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Gamson , J. 1998 . Freaks talk back: Tabloid talk shows and sexual nonconformity. , Chicago : University of Chicago Press .
   Google Scholar
• Gerbner , G. , Gross , L. , Morgan , M. and Signorielli , N. 1982 . Charting the mainstream: Television's contribution to political orientation. . Journal of Communication , 32 : 100 – 127 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg , B. , Sherry , J. , Busselle , R. , Hnilo , L. and Smith , S. 1997 . Daytime television talk shows: Guests, content, and interactions. . Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media , 41 : 412 – 426 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg , B. and Smith , S. 1995, November . The content of television talk shows. Report prepared for the Kaiser Family Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy , B. W. , Scheufele , D. A. and Wang , Z. Defining deliberation: Key determinants and distinct dimensions. Paper presented at the 2005 annual conference of the International Communication Association. May , New York.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes , A. F. 2005 . Statistical methods for communication science. , Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. .
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington , M. J. 2005 . Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. , Princeton : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hofstetter , C. R. 1998 . Political talk radio, situational involvement, and political mobilization. . Social Science Quarterly , 79 : 273 – 286 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilie , C. 2001 . Semi-institutional discourse: The case of talk shows. . Journal of Pragmatics , 33 : 209 – 254 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar , S. and Kinder , D. R. 1987 . News that matters , Chicago. University of Chicago Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kinder , D. R. 1998 . Communication and Opinion. . Annual Review of Political Science , 1 : 167 – 197 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak , N. , Wang , X. and Guggenheim , L. Linking all the way: The relationship between television entertainment talk show viewing and political engagement among young adults. Paper presented to the annual meeting for the Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. August , Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld , P. F. and Merton , R. K. 1948 . “ Mass communication, popular taste, and organized social action. ” . In The communication of ideas , Edited by: Bryson , L. 95 – 118 . New York : Harper .
   Google Scholar
• Leiby , R. 2005, April 7 . “ The reliable source. ” . In The Washington Post C3
   Google Scholar
• Lippmann , W. 1922 . Public opinion. , New York : Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Loehlin , J. C. 1992 . Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis , 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. .
   Google Scholar
• Manga , J. E. 2003 . Talking trash: The cultural politics of daytime talk shows. , New York : New York University Press. .
   Google Scholar
• McCombs , M. E. 2005 . “ The agenda setting function of the press. ” . In The press , Edited by: Overholser , G. and Jamieson , K. H. 156 – 168 . Oxford, , England : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• McCombs , M. E. and Shaw , D. L. 1972 . The agenda-setting function of mass media. . Public Opinion Quarterly , 36 : 176 – 185 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombs , M. E. and Shaw , D. L. 1993 . The evolution of agenda-setting research: Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. . Journal of Communication , 43 ( 2 ) : 58 – 67 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moy , P. , Xenos , M. A. and Hess , V. K. Priming effects of late-night comedy. Paper presented to the annual conference of the International Communication Association. May , New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Nabi , R. L. and Hendricks , A. 2003 . The persuasive effect of host and audience reaction shots in television talk shows. . Journal of Communication , 53 ( 3 ) : 527 – 543 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordlinger, J. (2000, June 19). Rosie O'Donnell, political activist—a celebrity and her platform. National Review. Retrieved March 11, 2005, from http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_11_52/ai_62838140
   Google Scholar
• Pan , Z. D. and Kosicki , G. 1997 . Talk show exposure as an opinion activity. . Political Communication , 14 : 371 – 388 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter , W. J. 1986 . Perceived reality and the cultivation hypothesis. . Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media , 30 : 159 – 174 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter , W. J. 1988 . Perceived reality in television effects research. . Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media , 32 : 23 – 41 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson , B. E. 1982 . Family experts on television talk shows: Facts, values, and half-truths. . Family Relations: Journal of Applied Family & Child Studies , 31 : 369 – 378 .
   Google Scholar
• Rössler , P. and Brosius , H. B. 2001 . Do talk shows cultivate adolescents' views of the world? A prolonged-exposure experiment. . Journal of Communication , 51 ( 1 ) : 143 – 163 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele , D. 2000 . Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. . Mass Communication & Society , 3 : 297 – 316 .
   Google Scholar
• Scott , G. G. 1996 . Can we talk: The power and influence of talk shows. , New York : Plenum .
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan , J. and Morgan , M. 1999 . Television and its viewers: Cultivation theory and research. , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Shape Our World. 2006, May 8 . The people who shape our world. . Time , 167 ( 19 ) : 48
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro , M. A. and Lang , A. 1991 . Making television reality: Unconscious process in the construction of social reality. . Communication Research , 18 : 685 – 705 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shattuc , J. M. 1997 . The talking cure: TV talks shows and women. , New York : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Shrum , L. J. 1995 . Accessing the social influence of television: A social cognition perspective on cultivation effects. . Communication Research , 22 : 402 – 429 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrum , L. J. 1996 . Psychological processes underlying cultivation effects: Further tests of construct availability. . Human Communication Research , 22 : 482 – 509 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sniderman , P. M. , Brody , R. E. and Tetlock , P. E. 1991 . “ Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. ” . New York : Cambridge University Press. .
   Google Scholar
• Striphas , T. 2003 . The dialectic with the everyday: Communication and cultural politics on Oprah Winfrey's book club. . Critical Studies in Media Communication , 20 ( 3 ) : 295 – 316 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo , H. and Dominick , J. R. 2003 . Acculturation, cultivation, and daytime TV talk shows. . Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly , 80 : 109 – 127 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar