Internal, External, and Government Political Efficacy: Effects on News Use, Discussion, and Political Participation

References

• Agnafors, M. (2013). Quality of government: Toward a more complex definition. American Political Science Review, 107, 433–445. doi:10.1017/S0003055413000191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann, I., Correa, T., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2012). Profiling online content creators: Advancing the paths to democracy. International Journal of E-Politics, 3, 1–19. doi:10.4018/jep.2012100101
   Google Scholar
• Balch, G. I. (1974). Multiple indicators in survey research: The concept sense of political efficacy. Political Methodology, 1, 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248–287. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S. E. (1997). “Knowledge of politics and sense of subjective political competence: The ambiguous connection. American Politics Research, 25, 230–240. doi:10.1177/1532673X9702500205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, S. E., Rhine, S. L., Flickinger, R. S., & Bennett, L. L. (1999). “Video malaise” revisited. Public trust in the media and government. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 4, 8–23. doi:10.1177/1081180X9900400402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, J. M., Portney, K. E., & Thomson, K. (1993). The rebirth of urban democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blais, A. (2010). Political participation. In L. LeDuc, R. G. Niemi, & P. Norris (Eds.), Comparing democracies 3: Elections and voting in the 21st century (pp. 164–183). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (2002). Democracy, institutions and attitudes about citizen influence on government. British Journal of Political Science, 32, 371–390. doi:10.1017/S0007123402000157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., Gurin, G., & Miller, W. E. (1954). The voter decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
   Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. Oxfork, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, J., Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., McLeod, D. M., Scholl, R. M., & Gotlieb, M. R. (2009). Campaigns, reflection, and deliberation: Advancing an O-S-R-O-R model of communication effects. Communication Theory, 19, 66–88. doi:10.1111/comt.2009.19.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Converse, P. E. (1972). Change in the American electorate. In A. Campbell & P. E. Converse (Eds.), The human meaning of social change. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Correa, T., Bachmann, I., Hinsley, A. W., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2013). Personality and social media use. In E. Li, S. Loh, C. Evans, & F. Lorenzi (Eds.), Organizations and social networks: Utilizing social media to engage consumers (pp. 41–61). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4026-9.ch003
   Google Scholar
• Craig, S. C., Niemi, R. G., & Silver, G. E. (1990). Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior, 12, 289–314. doi:10.1007/BF00992337
   Google Scholar
• De Vreese, C. H. (2005). The spiral of cynicism reconsidered. European Journal of Communication, 20, 283–301. doi:10.1177/0267323105055259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1993). Measuring political knowledge: Putting first things first. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 1179–1206. doi:10.2307/2111549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl, T., Weeks, B., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2015). Political persuasion on social media: Tracing direct and indirect effects of news use and social interaction. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444815616224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyck, J. J., & Lascher, Jr., E. L. (2009). Direct democracy and political efficacy reconsidered. Political Behavior, 31, 401–427. doi:10.1007/s11109-008-9081-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59, 205–224. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, Jr., W. P., & Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Connecting news media use with gaps in knowledge and participation. Political Communication, 17, 215–237. doi:10.1080/105846000414250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, S. E. (1985). Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 891–913. doi:10.2307/2111186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, S. E. (1987). The effects of participation on political efficacy and political support: Evidence from a West German panel. The Journal of Politics, 49, 441–464. doi:10.2307/2131308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. (1995). The voice of the people. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallego, A., & Oberski, D. (2012). Personality and political participation: The mediation hypothesis. Political Behavior, 34, 425–451. doi:10.1007/s11109-011-9168-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. (1968). Power and discontent (vol. 124). Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., Black, L. W., Deess, E. P., & Leighter, J. (2008). From group member to democratic citizen: How deliberating with fellow jurors reshapes civic attitudes. Human Communication Research, 34, 137–169. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00316.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., & Dillard, J. P. (1999). Increasing political sophistication through public deliberation. Political Communication, 16, 3–23. doi:10.1080/105846099198749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., & Xenos, M. (2010). Of attitudes and engagement: Clarifying the reciprocal relationship between civic attitudes and political participation. Journal of Communication, 60, 318–343. doi:10.1111/jcom.2010.60.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2006). Reshaping the digital inequality in the European union: How psychological variables affect Internet adoption rates. Webology, 3, Article 32. Retrieved from http://www.webology.org/2006/v3n4/a32.html
   Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2015). Toward a European public sphere? The promise and perils of modern democracy in the age of digital and social media. International Journal of Communication, 9, 3152–3160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Valenzuela, S. (2010). Who uses Facebook and why. In D. Wittkower (Ed.), Facebook and philosophy: What’s on your mind? (pp. xxi–xxxxi). Chicago, IL: Open Court Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Weeks, B., & Ardèvol-Abreu, A. (2017). Effects of the ‘news finds me’ perception in communication: Social media use implications for news seeking and learning about politics. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 22(3), 105–123. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D. P., & Shachar., R. (2000). Habit formation and political behavior: Evidence of consuetude in voter turnout. British Journal of Political Science, 30, 561–573. doi:10.1017/S0007123400000247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherington, M. J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review, 92, 791–808. doi:10.2307/2586304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. (1980). Subjective political efficacy as a measure of diffuse support. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 249–256. doi:10.1086/268589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19–39. doi:10.1111/jcom.2009.59.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffres, L. W., Atkin, D., & Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). A model linking community activity and communication with political attitudes and involvement in neighborhoods. Political Communication, 19, 387–421. doi:10.1080/01957470290055574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaid, L. L., McKinney, M. S., & Tedesco, J. C. (2007). Political information efficacy and young voters. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1093–1117. doi:10.1177/0002764207300040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenski, K., & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50 (2), 173–192. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolln, A. K., Esaiasson, P., & Turper, S. (2013). External efficacy and perceived responsiveness–aame, same or different?. Lancaster.ac.uk. Retrieved from http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/events/epop2013/docs/External%20efficacy%20and%20responsiveness%201209.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. T. (2005). Media effects on political disengagement revisited: A multiple-media approach. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82, 416–433. doi:10.1177/107769900508200211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClurg, S. D. (2003). Social networks and political participation: The role of social interaction in explaining political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 449–464. doi:10.1177/106591290305600407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. M., & McDonald, D. G. (1985). Beyond simple exposure: Media orientations and their impact on political processes. Communication Research, 12, 3–33. doi:10.1177/009365085012001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16, 315–336. doi:10.1080/105846099198659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. (1991). Considerations on representative government. In J. Gray (Ed.), On liberty and other essays. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. H. (1974). Political issues and trust in government: 1964–1970. American Political Science Review, 68, 951–972. doi:10.2307/1959140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondak, J. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrell, M. E. (2003). Survey and experimental evidence for a reliable and valid measure of internal political efficacy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 589–602. doi:10.1086/378965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrell, M. E. (2005). Deliberation, democratic decision-making and internal political efficacy. Political Behavior, 27, 49–69. doi:10.1007/s11109-005-3076-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemi, R. G., Craig, S. C., & Mattei, F. (1991). Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study. The American Political Science Review, 1407–1413. doi:10.2307/1963953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center for the People and the Press (PEW). (2013). July 2013 Political Survey. Methodology. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org
   Google Scholar
• Pingree, R. J. (2011). Effects of unresolved factual disputes in the news on epistemic political efficacy. Journal of Communication, 61, 22–47. doi:10.1111/jcom.2011.61.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkleton, B. E., & Austin, E. W. (2001). Individual motivations, perceived media importance, and political disaffection. Political Communication, 18, 321–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkleton, B. E., Austin, E. W., & Fortman, K. K. (1998). Relationships of media use and political disaffection to political efficacy and voting behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42, 34–49. doi:10.1080/08838159809364433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, III, P. H. (1983). The participatory consequences of internal and external political efficacy: A research note. The Western Political Quarterly, 400–409. doi:10.1177/106591298303600306
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L. (2013). “We need to decide!”: A mixed-method approach to responsiveness and equal treatment. In P. Esaiasson & H. M. Narud (Eds.), Between-election democracy: The representative relationship after election day (pp. 171–188). Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance, 21, 165–190. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. A., & Tolbert, C. (2004). Educated by initiative: The effects of direct democracy on citizens and political organizations in the American states. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, III., H. H. (1986). Newspaper readership as a determinant of political knowledge and activity. Newspaper Research Journal, 7, 47–54.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. A. (1999). The delegates experience. In M. McCombs & A. Reynolds (Eds.), The poll with a human face: The national issues convention experiment in political communication (pp. 39–58). Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, D. E. (1962). Popular evaluations of government: An empirical assessment. In H. Cleveland & H. D. Lasswell (Ed.), Ethics and bigness: Scientific, academic, religious, political, and military. New York, NY: Harper and Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Tedesco, J. C. (2007). Examining Internet interactivity effects on young adult political information efficacy. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1183–1194. doi:10.1177/0002764207300041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, D., Hals, M. L., & Bibart, A. (2008). The efficacy of news browsing: The relationship of news consumption style to social and political efficacy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 85, 257–272. doi:10.1177/107769900808500203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2003). Unraveling the effects of the Internet on political participation? Political Research Quarterly, 56, 175–185. doi:10.1177/106591290305600206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, N. A., Beckmann, M. N., & Buhr, T. A. (2001). A spiral of cynicism for some: The contingent effects of campaign news frames on participation and confidence in government. Political Communication, 18, 347–367. doi:10.1080/10584600152647083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, N. A., Gregorowicz, K., & Groenendyk, E. W. (2009). Efficacy, emotions and the habit of participation. Political Behavior, 31, 307. doi:10.1007/s11109-008-9076-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela, S., & Arriagada, A. (2011). Politics without citizens? Public opinion, television news, the president, and real-world factors in Chile, 2000–2005. International Journal of Press/Politics, 16, 357–381. doi:10.1177/1940161210379636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velasquez, A., & LaRose, R. (2015). Social media for social change: Social media political efficacy and activism in student activist groups. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59, 456–474. doi:10.1080/08838151.2015.1054998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York, NY: Harper & Rowe.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics (vol. 4). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, K. C. (2004). Talking about politics: Informal groups and social identity in American life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, B., Ardèvol-Abreu, A., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2016). Online influence? Social media use, opinion leadership, and political persuasion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edv050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollman, N., & Stouder, R. (1991). Believed efficacy and political activity: A test of the specificity hypothesis. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 557–566. doi:10.1080/00224545.1991.9713885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, S. W., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2014). Connecting blog, Facebook, and Twitter use with gaps in knowledge and participation. Communication & Society, 27, 33–48. doi:10.15581/003.27.4.33-48.
   Google Scholar