References
- Ansolabehere, S., & Schaffner, B. F. (2014). Does survey mode still matter? Findings from a 2010 multi-mode comparison. Political Analysis, 22(3), 285–303. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpt025
- Baum, M. A., & Groeling, T. (2008). New media and the polarization of American political discourse. Political Communication, 25(4), 345–365. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600802426965
- Bennett, W. L., Segerberg, A., & Knüpfer, C. B. (2018). The democratic interface: Technology, political organization, and diverging patterns of electoral representation. Information, Communication & Society, 21(11), 1655–1680. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1348533
- Brundidge, J., Garrett, R. K., Rojas, H., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2014). Political participation and ideological news online: “Differential gains” and “differential losses” in a presidential election cycle. Mass Communication and Society, 17(4), 464–486. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2013.821492
- Choi, H., Warner, B. R., & Jennings, F. J. (2018). What mobilizes partisans? Exploring the underlying pathways between partisan media and political participation. In B. R. Warner, D. G. Bystrom, M. S. McKinney, & M. C. Banwart (Eds.), An unprecedented election: Media, communication, and the electorate in the 2016 campaign (pp. 21–39). Praeger.
- Coe, K., Tewksbury, D., Bond, B. J., Drogos, K. L., Porter, R. W., Yahn, A., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Hostile news: Partisan use and perceptions of cable news programming. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00381.x
- Delli Carpini, M. X., & Williams, B. A. (1994). Methods, metaphors, and media research: The uses of television in political conversation. Communication Research, 21(6), 782–812. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/009365094021006007
- Dilliplane, S. (2011). All the news you want to hear: The impact of partisan news exposure on political participation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(2), 287–316. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr006
- Druckman, J. N., Levendusky, M. S., & McLain, A. (2018). No need to watch: How the effects of partisan media can spread via interpersonal discussions. American Journal of Political Science, 62(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12325
- Edgerly, S. (2015). Red media, blue media, and purple media: News repertoires in the colorful media landscape. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.998220
- Eveland, W. P., & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.x
- Garrett, R. K., & Stroud, N. J. (2014). Partisan paths to exposure diversity: Differences in pro- and counterattitudinal news consumption. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 680–701. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12105
- Garrett, R. K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59(4), 676–699. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x
- Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2011). Ideological segregation online and offline. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1799–1839. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr044
- Gil de Zúñiga, H., Correa, T., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Selective exposure to cable news and immigration in the U.S.: The relationship between FOX News, CNN, and attitudes toward Mexican immigrants. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 597–615. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732138
- Gil de Zúñiga, H., Diehl, T., Huber, B., & Liu, J. H. (2019). The citizen communication mediation model across countries: A multilevel mediation model of news use and discussion on political participation. Journal of Communication, 69(2), 144–167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz002
- Grieco, E. (2020, April 1). Americans’ main sources for political news vary by party and age. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2021/03/23/large-majorities-ofnewsmax-and-oan-news-consumers-also-go-to-fox-news/
- Hmielowski, J. D., Hutchens, M. J., & Beam, M. A. (2020). Asymmetry of partisan media effects?: Examining the reinforcing process of conservative and liberal media with political beliefs. Political Communication, 37(6), 852–868. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1763525
- Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology, 25(1), 65–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00357.x
- Hutchens, M. J., Hmielowski, J. D., & Beam, M. A. (2019). Reinforcing spirals of political discussion and affective polarization. Communication Monographs, 86(3), 357–376. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1575255
- Ikeda, K., & Boase, J. (2011). Multiple discussion networks and their consequence for political participation. Communication Research, 38(5), 660–683. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210395063
- Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
- Jamieson, K. H., & Cappella, J. N. (2008). Echo chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the conservative media establishment. Oxford University Press.
- Jurkowitz, M., Mitchell, A., Shearer, E., & Walker, M. (2020, January 24). U.S. media polarization and the 2020 election: A nation divided. Pew Research Center. https://www.journalism.org/2020/01/24/u-s-media-polarization-and-the-2020-election-a-nation-divided/
- Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Free Press.
- Kim, Y. (2015). Does disagreement mitigate polarization? How selective exposure and disagreement affect political polarization. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(4), 915–937. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015596328
- Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
- Knoke, D. (1990). Networks of political action: Toward theory construction. Social Forces, 68(4), 1041–1063. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2579133
- Levendusky, M. (2013). Partisan media exposure and attitudes toward the opposition. Political Communication, 30(4), 565–581. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737435
- Lu, Y., Heatherly, K. A., & Lee, J. K. (2016). Cross-cutting exposure on social networking sites: The effects of SNS discussion disagreement on political participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 74–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.030
- Martin, G. J., & Yurukoglu, A. (2017). Bias in cable news: Persuasion and polarization. American Economic Review, 107(9), 2565–2599. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160812
- Matthes, J., Knoll, J., Valenzuela, S., Hopmann, D. N., & Von Sikorski, C. (2019). A meta-analysis of the effects of cross-cutting exposure on political participation. Political Communication, 36(4), 523–542. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1619638
- Matthes, J. (2013). Do hostile opinion environments harm political participation? The moderating role of generalized social trust. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/eds006
- Mitchell, A. (2021, March 23). Large majorities of Newsmax and OAN news consumers also go to Fox News. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2021/03/23/large-majorities-of-newsmax-and-oan-news-consumers-also-go-to-fox-news/
- Mitchell, A., Gottfried, J., Stocking, G., Matsa, K. E., & Grieco, E. (2017, October 2). Covering President Trump in a polarized media environment. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2017/10/02/covering-presidenttrump-in-a-polarized-media-environment/
- Mutz, D. C., & Martin, P. S. (2001). Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: The role of mass media. American Political Science Review, 95(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055401000223
- Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge University Press.
- Neo, R. L. (2019). Mediation or moderation? Examining how politically like-minded and dissimilar conversations influence the relationship between social media political information consumption and political participation. Communication Studies, 70(2), 151–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2019.1590435
- Nir, L. (2011). Disagreement and opposition in social networks: Does disagreement discourage turnout? Political Studies, 59(3), 674–692. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00873.x
- Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
- Price, V., Cappella, J. N., & Nir, L. (2002). Does disagreement contribute to more deliberative opinion? Political Communication, 19(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/105846002317246506
- Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
- Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D., & Nisbet, E. C. (2004). Social structure and citizenship: Examining the impacts of social setting, network heterogeneity, and informational variables on political participation. Political Communication, 21(3), 315–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600490481389
- Scheufele, D. A. (2002). Examining differential gains from mass media and their implications for participatory behavior. Communication Research, 29(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/009365020202900103
- Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32(5), 531–565. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205279209
- Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Nah, S., Gotlieb, M. R., Hwang, H., Lee, N. J., Scholl, R. M., & McLeod, D. M. (2007). Campaign ads, online messaging, and participation: Extending the communication mediation model. Journal of Communication, 57(4), 676–703. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00363.x
- Shah, D. V., McLeod, D. M., Rojas, H., Cho, J., Wagner, M. W., & Friedland, L. A. (2017). Revising the communication mediation model for a new political communication ecology. Human Communication Research, 43(4), 491–504. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12115
- Shah, D. V. (2016). Conversation is the soul of democracy: Expression effects, communication mediation, and digital media. Communication and the Public, 1(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047316628310
- Sotirovic, M., & McLeod, J. M. (2001). Values, communication behavior, and political participation. Political Communication, 18(3), 273–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600152400347
- Sprunt, B. (2020, October 26). Amy Coney Barrett confirmed to Supreme Court, takes constitutional oath. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2020/10/26/927640619/senate-confirms-amy-coney-barrett-to-the-supreme-court
- Stroud, N. J., & Collier, J. R. (2018). Selective exposure and homophily during the 2016 presidential campaign. In B. R. Warner, D. G. Bystrom, M. S. McKinney, and M. C. Branwart (Eds.), An unprecedented election: Media, communication, and the electorate in the 2016 campaign (pp. 21–39). Praeger.
- Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. Oxford University Press.
- Tesser, A., & Leone, C. (1977). Cognitive schemas and thought as determinants of attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(4), 340–356. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(77)90004-X
- Thorson, K., & Wells, C. (2015). How gatekeeping still matters: Understanding media effects in an era of curated flows. In T. P. Vos & F. Heinderyckx (Eds.), Gatekeeping in transition (pp. 25–44). Routledge.
- Wang, M. Y., Hmielowski, J. D., Hutchens, M. J., & Beam, M. A. (2017). Extending the spiral of silence: Partisan media, perceived support, and sharing opinions online. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 14(3), 248–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1338980
- Weaver, D. A., & Scacco, J. M. (2013). Revisiting the protest paradigm: The Tea Party as filtered through prime-time cable news. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212462872
- Weeks, B. E., Lane, D. S., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. S., & Kwak, N. (2017). Incidental exposure, selective exposure, and political information sharing: Integrating online exposure patterns and expression on social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(6), 363–379. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12199
- Wojcieszak, M., Bimber, B., Feldman, L., & Stroud, N. J. (2016). Partisan news and political participation: Exploring mediated relationships. Political Communication, 33(2), 241–260. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1051608
- Young, D. G. (2004). Late-night comedy in election 2000: Its influence on candidate trait ratings and the moderating effects of political knowledge and partisanship. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4801_1