A Just and Happy Ending: Exploring Viewers’ Judgment of Justice on Enjoyment of Crime Drama in Interactive Movie Events

References

• Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724022014322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnfield, M. (2019). Think twice before jumping on the bandwagon: Clarifying concepts in research on the bandwagon effect. Political Studies Review, 18(4) , 553–574. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929919870691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. M. (1988). Presidential primaries and dynamics of public choice. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartsch, A., Scherr, S., Mares, M. L., & Oliver, M. B. (2020). Reflective thoughts about violent media content – Development of a bilingual self-report scale in English and German. Media Psychology, 23(6), 794–819. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1647248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. L. (2017). Social context of media use. In P. Rössler, C. A. Hoffner, & L. van Zoonen (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of media effects (pp. 1–12). John Wiley & Sons Inc. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0203
   Google Scholar
• Eden, A., Daalmans, S., van Ommen, M., & Weljers, A. (2017). Melfi’s choice: Morally conflicted content leads to moral rumination in viewers. Journal of Media Ethics, 32(3), 142–153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2017.1329019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, A., Grizzard, M., & Lewis, R. J. (2011). Disposition development in drama: The role of moral, immoral and ambiguously moral characters. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 4(1), 33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/IJART.2011.037768
   Google Scholar
• Fein, S., Goethals, G. R., & Kugler, M. B. (2007). Social influence on political judgments: The case of presidential debates. Political Psychology, 28(2), 165–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00561.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firth, D. (1993). Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika, 80(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/80.1.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grizzard, M., Fitzgerald, K., Francemone, C. J., Ahn, C., Huang, J., Walton, J., Lewis, R. J., Huang, J., Walton, J., Lewis, R. J., Walton, J., Lewis, R. J., Lewis, R. J., Huang, J., Walton, J., Lewis, R. J., Walton, J., Lewis, R. J., Lewis, R. J., Lewis, R. J. (2019). Narrative retribution and cognitive processing. Communication Research, 48(4) , 619–638. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219886512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, K. S., Lee, H. Y., Ha, S., Jang, S., & Lee, J. (2018). The influence of “social viewing” on televised debate viewers’ political judgment. Political Communication, 35(2), 287–305. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1354947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinze, G., Ploner, M., Dunkler, D., Southworth, H., & Jiricka, L. (2020). logistf: Firth’s bias-reduced logistic regression [computer software]. from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/logistf/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Heinze, G., & Schemper, M. (2002). A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Statistics in Medicine, 21(16), 2409–2419. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, M., Tamborini, R., & Ryffel, F. (2020). Between a rock and a hard place: The role of moral intuitions and social distance in determining moral judgments of an actor in a moral dilemma. Journal of Media Psychology, 33(3), 103–112 . Advance online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Telecommunication Union. (2020). Measuring digital development Measuring digital development. Facts and figures 2020. from https://www.itu.int/en/myitu/Publications/2020/11/30/09/32/Measuring-digital-development-2020
   Google Scholar
• Janicke, S. H., & Raney, A. A. (2015). Exploring the role of identification and moral disengagement in the enjoyment of an antihero television series. Communications, 40(4), 485–495. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2015-0022
   Google Scholar
• Janicke, S. H., & Raney, A. A. (2018). Modeling the antihero narrative enjoyment process. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7(4), 533–546. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., & Zeng, L. (2017). Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis, 9(2), 137–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.PAN.A004868
   Google Scholar
• Krakowiak, K. M., & Oliver, M. B. (2012). When good characters do bad things: Examining the effect of moral ambiguity on enjoyment. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 117–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01618.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krakowiak, K. M., & Tsay-Vogel, M. (2013). What makes characters’ bad behaviors acceptable? The effects of character motivation and outcome on perceptions, character liking, and moral disengagement. Mass Communication and Society, 16(2), 179–199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2012.690926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Atkinson, L., & Sung, Y. H. (2020). Online bandwagon effects: Quantitative versus qualitative cues in online comments sections. New Media & Society, 9(3), 146144482096518. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820965187
   Google Scholar
• Leiner, D. J. (2019a). SoSci survey (Version 2.6.00) [Computer software] [Computer software]. from https://www.soscisurvey.de
   Google Scholar
• Leiner, D. J. (2019b). Too fast, too straight, too weird: Non-reactive indicators for meaningless data in internet surveys. Survey Research Methods, 13(3), 229–248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18148/SRM/2019.V13I3.7403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. J., Tamborini, R., & Weber, R. (2014). Testing a dual-process model of media enjoyment and appreciation. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 397–416. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moy, P., & Rinke, E. M. (2012). Attitudinal and behavioral consequences of published opinion polls. In C. Holtz-Bacha & J. Stromback (Eds.), Opinion polls and the media: Reflecting and shaping public opinion (pp. 225–245). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (1992). Impersonal influence: Effects of representations of public opinion on political attitudes. Political Behaviors, 14(2), 89–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992237
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (1998). Impersonal influence. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175074
   Google Scholar
• Neo, R. L. (2020). The limits of online consensus effects: A social affirmation theory of how aggregate online rating scores influence trust in factual corrections. Communication Research, 47(5), 771–792. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218782823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. B., & Bartsch, A. (2011). Appreciation of entertainment: The importance of meaningfulness via virtue and wisdom. Journal of Media Psychology, 23(1), 29–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. B., & Raney, A. A. (2011). Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful: Identifying hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 984–1004. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01585.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing [computer software]. from http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Raney, A. A. (2002). Moral judgment as a predictor of enjoyment of crime drama. Media Psychology, 4(4), 305–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0404_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raney, A. A. (2005). Punishing media criminals and moral judgment: The impact on enjoyment. Media Psychology, 7(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0702_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raney, A. A., & Bryant, J. (2002). Moral judgment and crime drama: An integrated theory of enjoyment. Journal of Communication, 52(2), 402–415. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02552.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal, R. N., & Real, K. (2005). How behaviors are influenced by perceived norms. Communication Research, 32(3), 389–414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205275385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt‐Beck, R. (2005). Bandwagon effect. In G. Mazzoleni (Ed.), The international encyclopediaof political communication (pp. 57–61). Wiley. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc015.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M., & Maes, J. (2013). Equity and justice. In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Routledge communication series. Psychology of entertainment (pp. 273–289). Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Shafer, D., Janicke, S., & Seibert, J. (2016). Judgment and choice: Moral judgment, enjoyment and meaningfulness in interactive and non-interactive narratives. IOSRJournal of Humanities and Social Science, 21(8), 97–106 doi:https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2106010106. https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/comm_articles/38
   Google Scholar
• Stolwijk, S. B., Schuck, A. R. T., & de Vreese, C. H. (2016). How anxiety and enthusiasm help explain the bandwagon effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(4) , edw018. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tal-Or, N. (2019). The effects of co-viewers on the viewing experience. Communication Theory, 31(3), 316–335. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz012 Advance online publication
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tal-Or, N., & Tsfati, Y. (2018). Does the co-viewing of sexual material affect rape myth acceptance? The role of the co-viewer’s reactions and gender. Communication Research, 45(4), 577–602. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215595073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamborini, R. (2011). Moral intuition and media entertainment. Journal of Media Psychology, 23(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamborini, R., Grall, C., Prabhu, S., Hofer, M., Novotny, E., Hahn, L., Klebig, B., Kryston, K., Baldwin, J., Aley, M., & Sethi, N. (2018). Using attribution theory to explain the affective dispositions of tireless moral monitors toward narrative characters. Journal of Communication, 68(5), 842–871. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Meer, T. W. G., Hakhverdian, A., & Aaldering, L. (2016). Off the fence, onto the bandwagon? A large-scale survey experiment on effect of real-life poll outcomes on subsequent vote intentions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 28(1), 46–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edu041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorderer, P., Knobloch, S., & Schramm, H. (2001). Does entertainment suffer from interactivity? The impact of watching an interactive TV movie on viewers’ experience of entertainment. Media Psychology, 3(4), 343–363. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0304_03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell, T. F., Bailey, E., Weber, M. [., Ivory, J. D., & Downs, E. (2019). When media violence awakens our better nature: The effect of unpleasant violence on reactivity toward and enjoyment of media violence. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 63(4), 698–715. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2019.1677444
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M, & Quiring, O. (2019). Is it really that funny? Laughter, emotional contagion, and heuristic processing during shared media use. Media Psychology, 22(2), 173–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1302342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerback, T., Koch, T., & Krämer, B. (2015). Thinking of others: Effects of implicit and explicit media cues on climate of opinion perceptions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(2), 421–443. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015574481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D. (1971). Excitation transfer in communication-mediated aggressive behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7(4), 419–434. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(71)90075-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D. (2000). Basal morality in drama appreciation. In I. Bondebjerg (Ed.), Moving images, culture, and the mind (pp. 53–63). University of Luton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D., & Cantor, J. R. (1977). Affective responses to the emotions of a protagonist. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(2), 155–165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(77)80008-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D., Hay, T., & Bryant, J. (1975). The effect of suspense and its resolution on the appreciation of dramatic presentations. Journal of Research in Personality, 9(4), 307–323. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(75)90005-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar