Seeking Spoilage: The Impact of Content Challenge, Self-Control, and Traits on Spoiler Selection

References

• Appel, M., Gnambs, T., & Maio, G. R. (2012). A short measure of the need for affect. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(4), 418–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.666921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartsch, A., & Hartmann, T. (2017). The role of cognitive and affective challenge in entertainment experience. Communication Research, 44(1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214565921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.74.5.1252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Vohs, K. D. (2018). The strength model of self-regulation: Conclusions from the second decade of willpower research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1745691617716946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciarocco, N., Twenge, J. M., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The state self-control capacity scale: Reliability, validity, and correlations with physical and psychological stress [Paper presentation]. The annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, D. Y., & Wang, X. (2007). The role of need for cognition and reader beliefs in text comprehension and interest development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, T. A., & Katz, J. S. (2019). Spoilers affect the enjoyment of television episodes but not short stories. Psychological Reports, 122(5), 1794–1807. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118793971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, A., Hartmann, T., & Reinecke, L. (2015). Tuning in versus zoning out: The role of ego-depletion in selective exposure to challenging media. In H. Wang (Ed.), Communication and ”the good life” (International communication association theme book series, Vol. 2) (pp. 107–127). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Eden, A., Johnson, B. K., & Hartmann, T. (2018). Entertainment as a creature comfort: Self-control and selection of challenging media. Media Psychology, 21(3), 352–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1345640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellithorpe, M. E., & Brookes, S. E. (2018). I didn’t see that coming: Spoilers, fan theories, and their influence on enjoyment and parasocial breakup distress during a series finale. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7(3), 250–263. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/ppm0000134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exelmans, L., & Van den Bulck, J. (2021). “Glued to the tube”: The interplay between self-control, evening television viewing, and bedtime procrastination. Communication Research, 48(4), 594–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216686877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J., & Mittell, J. (2007). Speculation on spoilers: Lost fandom, narrative consumption and rethinking textuality. Particip@tions, 4(1), 1–46. http://www.participations.org/Volume%204/Issue%201/4_01_graymittell.htm
   Google Scholar
• Hastall, M. R. (2009). Informational utility as determinant of media choices. In T. Hartmann (Ed.), Media choice: A theoretical and empirical overview (pp. 149–166). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. K., Eden, A., Reinecke, L., & Hartmann, T. (2021). Self-control and need satisfaction in primetime: Television, social media, and friends can enhance regulatory resources via perceived autonomy and competence. Psychology of Popular Media, 10(2), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000286
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. K., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (2015). Spoiler alert: Consequences of narrative spoilers for dimensions of enjoyment, appreciation, and transportation. Communication Research, 42(8), 1068–1088. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214564051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. K., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (2018). (Don’t) tell me how it ends: Spoilers, enjoyment, and involvement in television and film. Media Psychology, 21(4), 582–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1338964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. K., Udvardi, A., Eden, A., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (2020). Spoilers go bump in the night: Impacts of minor and major reveals on horror film enjoyment. Journal of Media Psychology, 32(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Keplinger, C. (2008). Murder for pleasure: Impacts of plot complexity and need for cognition on mystery enjoyment. Journal of Media Psychology, 20(3), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105.20.3.117
   Google Scholar
• Leavitt, J. D., & Christenfeld, N. J. S. (2011). Story spoilers don’t spoil stories. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1152–1154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leavitt, J. D., & Christenfeld, N. J. (2013). The fluency of spoilers: Why giving away endings improves stories. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.3.1.09lea
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Lang, A. (2015). Redefining media content and structure in terms of available resources: Toward a dynamic human-centric theory of communication. Communication Research, 42(5), 599–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213488416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehne, M., & Koelsch, S. (2015). Tension-resolution patterns as a key element of aesthetic experience: Psychological principles and underlying brain mechanisms. In M. Nadal, J. P. Huston, L. Agnati, F. Mora, & C. J. Cela-Conde (Eds.), Art, aesthetics, and the brain (pp. 285–302). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, W. H., Betzner, M., & Autry, K. S. (2016). The effect of spoilers on the enjoyment of short stories. Discourse Processes, 53(7), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2016.1141350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. J., Tamborini, R., & Weber, R. (2014). Testing a dual-process model of media enjoyment and appreciation. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins de Holanda Coelho, G., Hanel, P., & Wolf, L. J. (2018). The very efficient assessment of need for cognition: Developing a six-item version. Assessment, 27(8), 1870–1885. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118793208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maio, G. R., & Esses, V. M. (2001). The need for affect: Individual differences in the motivation to approach or avoid emotions. Journal of Personality, 69(4), 583–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.694156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. B., & Bartsch, A. (2010). Appreciation as audience response: Exploring entertainment gratifications beyond hedonism. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 53–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01368.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H. S., & Smith, S. W. (2007). Distinctiveness and influence of subjective norms, personal descriptive and injunctive norms, and societal descriptive and injunctive norms on behavioral intent: A case of two behaviors critical to organ donation. Human Communication Research, 33(2), 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00296.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perks, L. G., & McElrath-Hart, N. (2017). Television spoilers recast as narrative teasers. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/17459435.2016.1247110
   Google Scholar
• Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9(1), 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinecke, L., Hartmann, T., & Eden, A. (2014). The guilty couch potato: The role of ego depletion in reducing recovery through media use. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 569–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinecke, L., & Hofmann, W. (2016). Slacking off or winding down? An experience sampling study on the drivers and consequences of media use for recovery versus procrastination. Human Communication Research, 42(3), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, J. E., & Johnson, B. K. (2016). Who’s afraid of spoilers? Need for cognition, need for affect, and narrative selection and enjoyment. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(3), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self‐control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, D. D., & Heatherton, T. F. (2013). Self-regulatory depletion increases emotional reactivity in the amygdala. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(4), 410–417. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, D., & Tsang, A. S. (2016). The misforecasted spoiler effect: Underlying mechanism and boundary conditions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2015.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1985). Affect, mood, and emotion as determinants of selective exposure. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 157–189). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar