Correcting E-Cigarette Misinformation on Social Media: Responses from UAE Nationals Who Smoke

References

• Abbasi, Y., Hout, M. -C.V., Faragalla, M., & Itani, L. (2022). Knowledge and use of electronic cigarettes in young adults in the United Arab emirates, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 7828. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albarracin, D., Romer, D., Jones, C., Hall Jamieson, K., & Jamieson, P. (2018). Misleading claims about tobacco products in YouTube videos: Experimental effects of misinformation on unhealthy attitudes. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(6), e229. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhouti, S., Musgrove, C., Casey, F., Butler, T. D., & D’Souza, G. (2015). Consumer reactions to retailer’s religious affiliation: Roles of belief congruence, religiosity, and cue strength. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 23(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2015.980176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayeh, J. K. (2015). Travellers’ acceptance of consumer-generated media: An integrated model of technology acceptance and source credibility theories. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2018). See something, say something: Correction of global health misinformation on social media. Health Communication, 33(9), 1131–1140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1331312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022, November 10). About electronic cigarettes (E-cigarettes). https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/basic_information/e-cigarettes/about-e-cigarettes.html
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Tilden, C., & Vernberg, D. K. (2020). Adolescents’ interpretations of e-cigarette advertising and their engagement with e-cigarette information: Results from five focus groups. Psychology & Health, 35(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1652752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, W. Y., Gaysynsky, A., & Cappella, J. N. (2020). Where we go from here: Health misinformation on social media. American Journal of Public Health, 110(S3), S273–275. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305905
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eisend, M. (2007). Understanding two-sided persuasion: An empirical assessment of theoretical approaches. Psychology & Marketing, 24(7), 615–640. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerström, K. O. (2005). Can reduced smoking be a way for smokers not interested in quitting to actually quit? Respiration, 72(2), 216–220. https://doi.org/10.1159/000084057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1962). Cognitive dissonance. Scientific American, 207(4), 93–106. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24936719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Herb, M. (2009). A nation of bureaucrats: Political participation and economic diversification in Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 41(3), 375–395. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743809091119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1952). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–650. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2745952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, J.,& Li, Y. (2020). Will you ever trust the review website again? The importance of source credibility. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 24(2), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2020.1715528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., & Wang, W. (2022). When a story contradicts: Correcting health misinformation on social media through different message formats and mechanisms. Information, Communication & Society, 25(8), 1192–1209. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1851390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husain, Z. (2022, June 3). Explained: Smoking e-cigarettes in offices, closed spaces not allowed – Ministry of health and prevention. Gulf News. https://gulfnews.com/living-in-uae/health/explained-smoking-e-cigarettes-in-offices-closed-spaces-not-allowed–ministry-of-health-and-prevention-1.1654264321170
   Google Scholar
• Jackler, R. K., Chau, C., Getachew, B. D., Whitcomb, M. M., Lee-Heidenreich, J., Bhatt, A. M., Kim O’Sullivan, S. H. S., Hoffman, Z. A., Jackler, L. M., & Ramamurthi, D. (2019). JUUL advertising over its first three years on the market. Stanford Research into the Impact of Tobacco Advertising. https://tobacco-img.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21231836/JUUL_Marketing_Stanford.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014). The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. Plos One, 9, e89177. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna, A., & Thompson, T. L. (2021). Misinformation about health: A review of health communication and misinformation scholarship. The American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2), 316–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219878223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R. (2022). Truth-default theory and the psychology of lying and deception detection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 47, 101380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Wright, C., Elizarova, O., Dahne, J., Bian, J., & Tan, A. S. L. (2021). Emotional responses and perceived relative harm mediate the effect of exposure to misinformation about e-cigarettes on twitter and intention to purchase e-cigarettes among adult smokers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(23), 12347. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Wright, C., Williams, P., Elizarova, O., Dahne, J., Bian, J., Zhao, Y., & Tan, A. S. L. (2021). Smokers’ likelihood to engage with information and misinformation on twitter about the relative harms of e-cigarette use: Results from a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 7(12), e27183. https://doi.org/10.2196/27183
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lowry, P. B., Wilson, D. W., & Haig, W. L. (2014). A picture is worth a thousand words: Source credibility theory applied to logo and website design for heightened credibility and consumer trust. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30(1), 63–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2013.839899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J. (1972). Attitude change: The information processing paradigm. In C. G. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental social psychology (pp. 108–141). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, A., Brose, L. S., Calder, R., Bauld, L., & Robson, D. (2018). Evidence review of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products 2018. A report commissioned by public health England. Public Health England. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/684963/Evidence_review_of_e-cigarettes_and_heated_tobacco_products_2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Neyazi, T. A., Kalogeropoulos, A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2021). Misinformation concerns and online news participation among internet users in India. Social Media + Society, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211009013
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
   Google Scholar
• Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyman, A. L., Huang, J., Weaver, S. R., & Eriksen, M. P. (2019). Perceived comparative harm of cigarettes and electronic nicotine delivery systems. The JAMA Network Open, 2(11), e1915680. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohanian, R. (1991). The impact of celebrity spokespersons’ perceived image on consumers’ intention to purchase. Journal of Advertising Research, 31(1), 46–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, H. J., & Lee, H. (2019). When do people verify and share health rumors on social media? The effects of message importance, health anxiety, and health literacy. Journal of Health Communication, 24(11), 837–847. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2019.1677824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, W., Liu, D., & Fang, J. (2021). An examination of factors contributing to the acceptance of online health misinformation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 630268. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.630268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perski, O., Beard, E., & Brown, J. (2020). Association between changes in harm perceptions and e-cigarette use among current tobacco smokers in England: A time series analysis. BMC Medicine, 18(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01565-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serman, Z. E., & Sims, J. (2022). Source credibility theory: SME hospitality sector blog posting during the Covid-19 pandemic. Information Systems Frontiers. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10349-3
   Google Scholar
• Suarez-Lledo, V., & Alvarez-Galvez, J. (2021). Prevalence of health misinformation on social media: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(1), e17187. https://doi.org/10.2196/17187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, A. S. L., & Bigman, C. A. (2020). Misinformation about commercial tobacco products on social media—implications and research opportunities for reducing tobacco-related health disparities. American Journal of Public Health, 110(S3), S281–283. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305910
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., Kim, S. C., & Cook, J. (2019). Testing logic-based and humor-based corrections for science, health, and political misinformation on social media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 63(3), 393–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2019.1653102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, N., & Murphy, S. T. (2018). How to unring the bell: A meta-analytic approach to correction of misinformation. Communication Monographs, 85(3), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1467564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., & Huang, Y. (2021). Countering the “harmless e-cigarette” myth: The interplay of message format, message sidedness, and prior experience with e-cigarette use in misinformation correction. Science Communication, 43(2), 170–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020974384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, N. (2022, June 20). Tobacco industry looks to win over gulf regulators in the great vape debate. The National News. https://www.thenationalnews.com/uae/2022/06/20/e-cigarettes-more-local-data-needed-to-assess-if-they-work-as-quitting-aids/
   Google Scholar
• Wright, C., Williams, P., Elizarova, O., Dahne, J., Bian, J., Zhao, Y., & Tan, A. S. L. (2021). Effects of brief exposure to misinformation about e-cigarette harms on twitter: A randomised controlled experiment. BMJ Open, 11(9), e045445. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045445
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yuen, K. F., Ong, K. W., Zhou, Y., & Wang, X. (2023). Social media engagement of stakeholders in the oil and gas sector: Social presence, triple bottom line and source credibility theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 382, 135375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar