STRATUM: A METHODOLOGY FOR DESIGNING HEURISTIC AGENT NEGOTIATION STRATEGIES

REFERENCES

• Amgoud , L. and S. Kaci . 2005 . On the generation of bipolar goals in argumentation-based negotiation . In: Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems: (Proceedings of the First International Workshop (ArgMAS'04): Expanded and Invited Contributions). Vol. 3366 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science , eds. I. Rahwan , P. Moraitis , and C. Reed , Berlin : Springer Verlag .
   Google Scholar
• Amgoud , L. and N. Maudet . 2002 . Strategical considerations for argumentative agents (preliminary report) . In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR 2002): Special Session on Argument, Dialogue and Decision , eds. S. Benferhat , and E. Giunchiglia . Toulouse , France : IRIT .
   Google Scholar
• Ashri , R. , I. Rahwan , and M. Luck . 2003 . Architectures for negotiating agents . In: Multi-Agent Systems and Applications III: Proceedings of the 3rd International Central and Eastern European Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (CEEMAS 2003) . Vol. 2691 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence , eds. by V. Marik , J. Miller , and M. Pechoucek , Berlin : Springer Verlag .
   Google Scholar
• Bartolini , C. , C. Preist , and N. R. Jennings . 2002 . Architecting for reuse: A software framework for automated negotiation . In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Agent-Oriented Software Engineering (AOSE-2002) , eds. F. Giunchiglia , J. Odell , and G. Weiss , Berlin : Springer Verlag .
   Google Scholar
• Bauer , B. , J. Müller , and J. Odell . 2001 . Agent UML: A formalism for specifying multiagent interaction . In: Agent-Oriented Software Engineering . Vol. 1957 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science , eds. P. Ciancarini , and M. Wooldridge , Berlin : Springer Verlag .
   Google Scholar
• Billington , D. 1993. Defeasible logic is stable. Journal of Logic and Computation 3:370–400.
   Google Scholar
• Binmore , K. and N. Vulkan . 1997 . Applying game theory to automated negotiation . In Proceedings of the DIMACS Workshop on Economics, Game Theory and the Internet . New Brunswick , N.J. Rutgers University .
   Google Scholar
• Boella , G. and L. van der Torre . 2004 . Groups as agents with mental attitudes . In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) , eds. N.R. Jennings , C. Sierra ; L. Sonenberg , and M. Jambe . Washington , D.C. : IEEE Computer Society .
   Google Scholar
• Bresciani , P. , A. Perini , P. Giorgini , F. Giunchiglia , and J. Mylopoulos . 2004 . Tropos: An agent-oriented software development methodology . Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 8 ( 3 ): 203 – 236 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer , C. F. 2003 . Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction . Princeton , N.J. : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Cohen , P. R. and C. R. Perrault . 1979 . Elements of a plan-based theory of speech acts . Cognitive Science 3 ( 1 ): 177 – 212 .
   Google Scholar
• Dash , R. K. , D. C. Parkes , and N. R. Jennings . 2003 . Computational mechanism design: A call to arms . IEEE Intelligent Systems 18 ( 6 ): 40 – 47 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dignum , V. 2004 . A model for organizational interaction: Based on agents, founded in logic . Ph.D. thesis, Institute of Information and Computing Sciences , Utrecht University , The Netherlands .
   Google Scholar
• d'Inverno , M. and M. Luck . 2001 . Understanding Agent Systems . Heidelberg : Springer Verlag .
   Google Scholar
• Dumas , M. , G. Governatory , A. H. M. ter Hofstede , and P. Oaks . 2002 . A formal approach to negotiating agent development . Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 1 ( 2 ): 193 – 207 .
   Google Scholar
• Dunne , P. E. 2003 . Prevarication in dispute protocols . In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on AI and Law (ICAIL) , eds. G. Sartor , New York ; ACM Press .
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson , J. and S. Janson . 2002 . The trading agent competition—TAC 2002 . ERCIM News 51 : 57 – 58 .
   Google Scholar
• Erol , K. , J. Hendler , and D. Nau . 1994 . Semantics for hierarchical task network planning . Technical Report CS-TR-3239, UMIACS-TR-94-31, Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland .
   Google Scholar
• Faratin , P. 2000 . Automated service negotiation between autonomous computational agents . Ph.D. thesis, University of London, Queen Mary and Westfield College, Department of Electronic Engineering .
   Google Scholar
• Fatima , S. , M. J. Wooldridge , and N. R. Jennings . 2001 . Optimal negotiation strategies for agents with incomplete information . In: Intelligent Agent Series VIII: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL 2001) . Vol. 2333 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science , eds. J.-J. Meyer and M. Tambe , Berlin : Springer Verlag .
   Google Scholar
• Fatima , S. , M. J. Wooldridge , and N. R. Jennings . 2002 . Multi-issue negotiation under time constraints . In: Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-2002) , eds. C. Castelfranchi and L. Johnson , New York : ACM Press .
   Google Scholar
• Fatima , S. , M. J. Wooldridge , and N. R. Jennings . 2005 . Bargaining with incomplete information . Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 44 ( 3 ): 207 – 232 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents (FIPA) . 2001 . Communicative Act Library Specification . Technical Report XC00037H , Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents , USA .
   Google Scholar
• Fisher , R. , W. Ury , and B. Patton . 1991 . Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving In. , 2nd ed. New York : Penguin Books .
   Google Scholar
• Fritschi , C. and K. Dorer . 2002 . Agent-oriented software engineering for successful TAC participation . In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems , Bologna, Italy , eds. C. Castelfranchi and W.L. Johnson . New York : ACM Press .
   Google Scholar
• Gal , Y. and A. Pfeffer . 2003 . A language for opponent modeling in repeated games . In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Game Theoretic and Decision Theoretic Agents (GTDT-2003) , eds. S. Parsons and P. Gmytrasiewicz , Melbourne , Australia .
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald , A. 2003 . The 2002 trading agent competition: An overview of agent strategies . AI Magazine 24 ( 1 ): 83 – 91 .
   Google Scholar
• Harel , D. and A. Naamad . 1996 . The STATEMATE semantics of statecharts . ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 5 ( 4 ): 293 – 333 .
   Google Scholar
• Harsanyi , J. C. 1956 . Approaches to the bargaining problem before and after the theory of games: A critical discussion of Zeuthen's, Hicks', and Nash's theories . Econometrica 24 : 144 – 157 .
   Google Scholar
• He , M. 2004 . Personal communication in person and via e-mail .
   Google Scholar
• He , M. and N. R. Jennings . 2003 . SouthamptonTAC: An adaptive autonomous trading agent . ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 3 ( 3 ): 218 – 235 .
   Google Scholar
• He , M. and N. R. Jennings . 2004 . Designing a successful trading agent using fuzzy techniques . IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems 12 ( 3 ): 389 – 410 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He , M. , H. Leung , and N. R. Jennings . 2003. A fuzzy logic based bidding strategy for autonomous agents in continuous double auctions. IEEE Transaction on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15(6):1345–1363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings , N. R. 2001 . An agent-based approach for building complex software sysems . Communications of the ACM 44 ( 4 ): 35 – 41 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings , N. R. , P. Faratin , A. R. Lomuscio , S. Parsons , C. Sierra , and M. J. Wooldridge . 2001 . Automated negotiation: Prospects, methods and challenges . International Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation 10 ( 2 ): 199 – 215 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings , N. R. and M. J. Wooldridge . 1998 . Applications of intelligent agents . In: Agent Technology: Foundations, Applications, and Markets , eds. N. R. Jennings , and M. J. Wooldridge , Heidelberg : Springer Verlag .
   Google Scholar
• Juan , T. , A. Pearce , and L. Sterling . 2002 . ROADMAP: Extending the Gaia methodology for complex open systems . In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2002) , eds. C. Castelfranchi , and W. L. Johnson , New York : ACM Press .
   Google Scholar
• Jung , H. , M. Tambe , and S. Kulkarni . 2001 . Argumentation as distributed constraint satisfaction: Applications and results . In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents , eds. J. P. Müller , E. Audre , S. Sen , and C. Frasson , New York : ACM Press .
   Google Scholar
• Karunatillake , N. C. and N. R. Jennings . 2004 . Is it worth arguing? In: Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, First International Workshop, ArgMAS 2004, Revised Selected and Invited Papers . Vol. 3366 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science , eds. I. Rahwan , P. Moraitis , and C. Reed . Heidelberg : Springer Verlag .
   Google Scholar
• Kowalczyk , R. and V. Bui . 2001 . On constraint-based reasoning in e-negotiation agents . In: Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce III . Vol. 2003 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science , eds. F. Dighum , and U. Cortes . Berlin : Springer Verlag .
   Google Scholar
• Kraus , S. 2001 . Strategic Negotiation in Multi-Agent Environments . Cambridge , MA : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kraus , S. , K. Sycara , and A. Evenchik . 1998 . Reaching agreements through argumentation: A logical model and implementation . Artificial Intelligence 104 ( 1–2 ): 1 – 69 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar , S. , M. J. Huber , and P. R. Cohen . 2002 . Representing and executing protocols as joint actions . In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2002) , eds. C. Castelfranchi , and W. L. Johnson , New York : ACM Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kungas , P. and J. Rao . 2004 . Symbolic agent negotiation for semantic web service exploitation . In: Advances in Web-Age Information Management, 5th International Conference, WAIM 2004 . Vol. 3129 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science , eds. Q. Li , C. Wanga , and L. Feng , Berlin : Springer Verlag .
   Google Scholar
• Larson , K. and T. Sandholm . 2001 . Bargaining with limited computation: Deliberation equilibrium . Artificial Intelligence 132 : 183 – 217 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicki , R. J. , D. M. Saunders , and J. W. Minton . eds. 2003 . Essentials of Negotiation . Boston : McGraw-Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Lilien , G. L. , P. Kotler , and S. K. Moorthy . 1992 . Marketing Models . Upper Saddle River , NJ : Prentice-Hall Press .
   Google Scholar
• Luck , M. , P. McBurney , and C. Preist . 2003 . Agent Technology: Enabling Next Generation Computing (A Roadmap for Agent Based Computing) . Southampton , UK : AgentLink .
   Google Scholar
• Maudet , N. and B. Chaib-draa . 2003 . Commitment-based and dialogue-game based protocols—New trends in agent communication language . Knowledge Engineering Review 17 ( 2 ): 157 – 179 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown , K. R. 1985 . Text Generation: Using Discourse Strategies and Focus Constraints to Generate Natural Language Text . Cambridge , UK : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Milch , B. and D. Koller . 2000 . Probabilistic models for agents' beliefs and decisions . In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in AI (UAI-2000) , Stanford, CA, USA , eds. C. Boutilier and M. Goldszmidt , San Francisco , CA : Morgan Kaufmann .
   Google Scholar
• Padgham , L. and M. Winikoff . 2004 . Developing Intelligent Agent Systems: A Practical Guide . New York : John Wiley & Sons .
   Google Scholar
• Parsons , S. , C. Sierra , and N. Jennings . 1998 . Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing . Journal of Logic and Computation 8 ( 3 ): 261 – 292 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons , S. , M. J. Wooldridge , and L. Amgoud . 2002 . An analysis of formal inter-agent dialogues . In: Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS-2002) , eds. C. Castelfranchi , and L. Johnson , New York : ACM Press .
   Google Scholar
• Parunak , H. V. D. P. 1999 . Industrial and practical applications of DAI . In: Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence , ed. G. Weiss , Cambridge , Mass. : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Rahwan , I. 2004. Interest-based negotiation in multi-agent Systems . Ph.D. thesis, Department of Information Systems, University of Melbourne , Melbourne , Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Rahwan , I. , P. McBurney , and L. Sonenberg . 2003 . Towards a theory of negotiation strategy (a preliminary report) . In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Game Theoretic and Decision Theoretic Agents (GTDT 2003) , Melbourne , Australia , eds. S. Parsons , and P. Gmytrasiewicz .
   Google Scholar
• Rahwan , I. , S. D. Ramchurn , N. R. Jennings , P. McBurney , S. Parsons , and L. Sonenberg . 2003 . Argumentation based negotiation . Knowledge Engineering Review 18 ( 4 ): 343 – 375 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahwan , I. , L. Sonenberg , and F. Dignum . 2003 . Towards interest-based negotiation . In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2003) , Melbourne, Australia , eds. J. Rosenschein , T. Sandholm , M. J. Wooldridge , and M. Yokoo , New York : ACM Press .
   Google Scholar
• Ramchurn , S. D. , N. R. Jennings , and C. Sierra . 2003 . Persuasive negotiation for autonomous agents: A rhetorical approach . In: Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument , Acapulco, Mexico , eds. C. Reed , F. Grasso , and G. Carenini , AAAI Press .
   Google Scholar
• Roberts , J. H. and J. M. Lattin . 1991 . Development and testing of a model of consideration set composition . Journal of Marketing Research 28 ( 4 ): 429 – 440 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenschein , J. and G. Zlotkin . 1994 . Rules of Encounter: Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation among Computers . Cambridge , Mass .: MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sadri , F. , F. Toni , and P. Torroni . 2001 . Logic agents, dialogues and negotiation: An abductive approach . In: Proceedings of the AISB 2001 Symposium on Information Agents for E-Commerce , York , UK , eds. K. Stathis , and M. Schroeder .
   Google Scholar
• Sadri , F. , F. Toni , and P. Torroni . 2002 . Abductive logic programming architecture for negotiating agents . In: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA-2002) , eds. S. Flesca , S. Greco , N. Leone , and G. Ianni , Vol. 2424 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science , Berlin : Springer Verlag .
   Google Scholar
• Sandholm , T. 2002 . eMediator: A next generation electronic commerce server . Computational Intelligence, Special issue on Agent Technology for Electronic Commerce 18 ( 4 ): 656 – 676 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandholm , T. and V. Lesser . 2002 . Leveled commitment contracting: A backtracking instrument for multiagent systems . Artificial Intelligence Magazine 23 ( 3 ): 89 – 100 .
   Google Scholar
• Schut , M. and M. Wooldridge . 2001 . The control of reasoning in resource-bounded agents . Knowledge Engineering Review 16 ( 3 ): 215 – 240 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sierra , C. , N. R. Jennings , P. Noriega , and S. Parsons . 1998 . A framework for argumentation-based negotiation . In: Intelligent Agent IV: 4th International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages (ATAL-1997) . Vol. 1365 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence , eds. M. Singh , A. Rao , and M. J. Wooldridge , Berlin : Springer Verlag .
   Google Scholar
• TAC . 2003. The Trading Agent Competition. http://www.sics.se/tac/. Accessed 1 July 2006 .
   Google Scholar
• Tambe , M. , E. Bowring , H. Jung , G. Kaminka , R. Maheswaran , J. Marecki , P. J. Modi , R. Nair , S. Okamoto , J. P. Pearce , P. Paruchuri , D. Pynadath , P. Scerri , N. Schurr , and P. Varakantham . 2005 . Conflicts in teamwork: Hybrids to the rescue . In: AAMAS '05: Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems , eds. F. Dignum , V. Dignum , S. Koenig , S. Kraus , M.P. Singh , and M. Woolridge , New York : ACM Press .
   Google Scholar
• Torroni , P. 2002 . A study on the termination of negotiation dialogues . In: Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-2002) eds. C. Castelfranchi , and L. Johnson , New York : ACM Press .
   Google Scholar
• von Stengel , B. 2002 . Computing equilibria for two-person games . In: Handbook of Game Theory , eds. R. Aumann , and S. Hart , Vol. 3 , Ch. 45 , Amsterdam , The Netherlands : Elsevier Science Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Walton , D. N. and E. C. W. Krabbe . 1995 . Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning . Albany , N.Y. : SUNY Press .
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge , M. , N. R. Jennings , and D. Kinny . 2000 . The Gaia methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design . Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 3 ( 3 ): 285 – 312 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge , M. J. 2002 . An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems . Chichester , England : John Wiley & Sons .
   Google Scholar
• Young , M. A. 2001 . Rational Games: A Philosophy of Business Negotiation from Practical Reason . Westport , Conn. : Quorum Books .
   Google Scholar
• Zambonelli , F. , N. R. Jennings , and M. Wooldridge . 2003 . Developing multiagent systems: The Gaia methodology . ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 12 ( 3 ): 317 – 370 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar