Evaluation of Current Documents Image Denoising Techniques: A Comparative Study

REFERENCES

• Abdel-Dayem, A. R., A. K. Hamou, and M. R. El-Sakka. 2004. Novel adaptive filtering for salt-and-pepper noise removal from binary document images. In Image analysis and recognition, LNCS 3212,191 –199.
   Google Scholar
• Abreu, E., M. Lightstone, S. Mitra, and K. Arakawa. 1996. A new efficient approach for the removal of impulse noise from highly corrupted images. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 5 (6 ):1012 –1025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed Mashaly, S., F. Ezz Eldin AbdElkawy, A. Tarek Mahmoud. 2010. Speckle noise reduction in sar images using adaptive morphological filter. 10th international conference on intelligent systems design and applications. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Khaffaf, H., A. Z. Talib, and R. A. Salam. 2008. Removing salt-and-pepper noise from binary images of engineering drawings. Paper presented at the 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR 2008,1 –4. Florida, 8–11 December.
   Google Scholar
• Bala, E., and A. Ertuzun. 2002. Applications of multiwavelet techniques to image denoising. In Proceedings of the international conference on image processing, vol.3: 581 –584. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Barni, M., F. Buti, F. Bartolini, and V. Cappellini. 2009. A quasi-Euclidean norm to speed up vector median filtering. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 9 (10 ):1704 –1709.
   Google Scholar
• Bovik, A. 1987. Streaking in median filtered images. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 35 (4 ):493 –503.
   Google Scholar
• Buades, A., B. Coll, and J. M. Morel. 2005. A review of image denoising algorithms with a new one multiscale modelling and simulation. SIAM Interdisciplinary Journal 4 (2 ):490 –530.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, R. H., C.-W. Ho, and M. Nikolova. 2005. Salt-and-pepper noise removal by median-type noise detectors and detail preserving regularization. IEEE Transactions on Image Progressing 14:1479 –1485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., J. Wng, W. Quin, and X. Dong. 2011. A new adaptive weight algorithm for salt and pepper noise removal. Consumer Electronics, Communication and Networks 26 –29. IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics, Communications and Networks (CECNet). XianNing, China, 16–18 April.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, H., and R. G. Baraniuk. 2004. Multiple wavelet basis image denoising using Besov ball projections. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 11 (9 ):717 –720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalong, L., S. Simske, and R. M. Mersereau. 2007. Image denoising through support vector regression. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 4:425 –428.
   Google Scholar
• Dalong, L. 2009. Support vector regression based image denoising image and vision computing. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium-Universitatis Pekinensis, 42(5):604.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Y. Q., and X. S. Fang. 2006. An efficient salt-and-pepper noise removal. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 42(5): 604 –612.
   Google Scholar
• Farahanirad, H., J. Shanbehzadeh, M. M. Pedram, and A. Sarrafzadeh. 2011. A hybrid edge detection algorithm for salt-and-pepper noise. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the IMECS. Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists. Hong Kong, 16–18 March.
   Google Scholar
• Seo, H. J., P. Chatterjee, H. Takeda, and P. Milanfar. 2007. A comparison of some state of the art image denoising methods. Conference record of the forty-first asilomar conference on signals, systems and computers, 518 –522. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Hamza, A. B., P. Luque, J. Martinez, and R. Roman. 1999. Removing noise and preserving details with relaxed median filters. Journal of Mathematical Image Vision 11 (2 ):161 –177.
   Google Scholar
• He, K., J. Zhou, C. Liu, and R. Liu. 2008. An efficient salt-and-pepper noise removal on local edge-preserving function. In Proceedings of the international conference on embedded software and systems symposia, (ICESS symposia ‘08), 392–397. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, S., and J. Zhu. 2010. Removal of salt-and-pepper noise based on compressed sensing. IEEE Electronic Letters 46 (17 ):1198 –1199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, S., and J. D. Johnston. 2002. Spatial noise shaping based on human visual sensitivity and its application to image coding. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 11 (5 ):509 –517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liying, F., F. Lixin, and L. T. Chew. 2001. Binarizing document image using coplanar prefilter. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on document analysis and recognition, 34 –38. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoudi, M., and G. Sapiro. 2005. Fast image and video denoising via non-local means of similar neighbourhoods. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 12 (12 ):839 –842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrotra, A., K. K. Singh, M. J. Nigam, and K. Pal. 2012. A novel algorithm for impulse noise removal and edge detection. International Journal of Computer Applications 38 (7 ):179 –187.
   Google Scholar
• Motwani, M. C., M. C. Gadiya, and R. C. Motwani. 2004. Survey of image denoising techniques. Paper presented at Proceedings of Global Signal Processing Expo and Conference GSPx, Santa Clara, CA, March.
   Google Scholar
• Mundher, M., D. Muhamad, A. Rehman, T. Saba, and F. Kausar. 2014. Digital watermarking for images security using discrete slantlet transform. Applied Mathematics and Information Sciences 8 (6 ):2823 –2830. doi:10.12785/amis/080618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolova, M. 2004. A variational approach to remove outliers and impulse noise. Journal of Mathematics, Imaging and Vision 20:99 –120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobi, M. N., and M. A. Yousuf. 2011. A new method to remove noise in magnetic resonance and ultrasound images. Journal of Scientific Research 3 (1 ):81 –89.
   Google Scholar
• Ping, Z., C. Lihui, and K. C. Alex. 2000. Text document filters using morphological and geometrical features of characters. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on signal processing, 1:472 – 475.
   Google Scholar
• Rehman, A., F. Kurniawan, and T. Saba. 2011.An automatic approach for line detection and removal without characters smash-up. Imaging Science Journal 59:171 –182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehman, A., D. Mohammad, G. Sulong, and T. Saba. 2009. Simple and effective techniques for core-zone detection and slant correction in script recognition. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Signal and Image Processing Applications (ICSIPA’09), 15 –20. Malaysia, 12–14 August.
   Google Scholar
• Rehman, A., and T. Saba. 2011a. Document skew estimation and correction: Analysis of techniques, common problems and possible solutions. Applied Artificial Intelligence 25 (9 ):769 –787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehman, A. and T. Saba. 2011b. Performance analysis of segmentation approach for cursive handwritten word recognition on benchmark database. Digital Signal Processing 21 (3 ):486 –490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehman, A., and T. Saba. 2014. Neural network for document image preprocessing. Artificial Intelligence Review 42 (2 ):253 –273. doi:10.1007/s10462-012-9337-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehman, A., T. Saba, and G. Sulong. 2010. An intelligent approach to image denoising. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology 17 (1 ):32 –36.
   Google Scholar
• Saba, T., and A. Rehman. 2012. Effects of artificially intelligent tools on pattern recognition. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 4(2): 155–162. doi:10.1007/s13042-012-0082-z.
   Google Scholar
• Saba, T., A. Rehman, A. Altameem, and M. Uddin. 2014. Annotated comparisons of proposed preprocessing techniques for script recognition. Neural Computing and Applications. doi 10.1007/s00521-014-1618-9
   Google Scholar
• Saba, T., A. Rehman, and M. Elarbi-Boudihir. 2011. Methods and strategies on off-line cursive touched characters segmentation: A directional review. Artificial Intelligence Review. doi. 10.1007/s10462-011-9271-5.
   Google Scholar
• Saba, T., G. Sulong, and A. Rehman. 2011. Document image analysis: Issues, comparison of methods and remaining problems. Artificial Intelligence Review 35 (2 ):101 –118. doi:10.1007/s10462-010-9186-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., and D. Zhang. 1999. Progressive switching median filter for the removal of impulse noise from highly corrupted images. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II 46:78 –80.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S. H., and C. H. Wu. 2009. A new impulse detection and filtering method for removal of wide range impulse noises. Pattern Recognition 42 (9 ):2194 –2202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing-mei, L., Y. Guo-ping, L. Xing-mei, and C. Liang. 2007. The image denoise based on soft-threshold and edge enhancement. Paper presented at the Second Workshop on Digital Media and its Application in Museum & Heritage, 53 –56. Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., and M. A. Karim. 2002. A new impulse detector for switching median filters. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 9:360 –363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Q., and T. Kanungo. 2001. Morphological degradation models and their use in document image restoration. In Proceedings of the international conference on image processing, 1:193 –196. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., C. Zhou, and B. G. Stewart. 2006. Comparisons of discrete wavelet transform, wavelet packet transform and stationary wavelet transform in denoise pd measurement, data. In Proceedings of the international symposium on electrical insulation, 237 –240. IEEE.
   Google Scholar