Trust Prediction in Online Communities Employing Neurofuzzy Approach

REFERENCES

• Abbasimehr, H., M. Setak, and J. Soroor. 2013. A framework for identification of high-value customers by including social network based variables for churn prediction using neurofuzzy techniques. International Journal of Production Research 51:1279–94. doi:10.1080/00207543.2012.707342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal, C. C. 2011. Social network data analytics. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bishr, M., Y.-G. Yang, and G. Lee. 2000. Self-tuning pid control using an adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing 6:271–80. doi:10.1080/10798587.2000.10642795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonacich, P. 2007. Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality. Social Networks 29:555–64. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2007.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clauset, A., M. E. J. Newman, and C. Moore. 2004. Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical Review E 70:066111. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, M. 1973. Algebraic connectivity of graphs. Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal 23:298–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbani, A., F. Taghiyareh, and C. Lucas. 2009. The application of the locally linear model tree on customer churn prediction. Paper presented at International Conference of Soft Computing and Patter Recognition, December 4–7, 2009, Malacca, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Girvan, M., and M. E. Newman. 2002. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99:7821–26. doi:10.1073/pnas.122653799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golbeck, J., and J. Hendler. 2006. Inferring binary trust relationships in web-based social networks. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 6:497–529. doi:10.1145/1183463.
   Google Scholar
• Han, J., M. Kamber, and J. Pei. 2011. Data mining: Concepts and techniques. San Francisco, CA: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, D. L., B. Schneiderman, and M. A. Smith. 2010. Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL. San Francisco, CA: Elsevier, Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, J.-S. R. 1993. ANFIS: Adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 23:665–85. doi:10.1109/21.256541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, J. S. R., C. T. Sun, and E. Mizutani. 1997. Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing: A computational approach to learning and machine intelligence. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Jelassi, T., and A. Enders. 2008. Strategies for e-business: Creating value through electronic and mobile commerce: Concepts and cases. Harlow, England: FT Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kamvar, S. D., M. T. Schlosser, and H. Garcia-Molina. 2002. The eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in p2p networks. Stanford, CA: Stanford InfoLab.
   Google Scholar
• Kernighan, B. W., and S. Lin. 1970. An efficient heuristic procedure for partitioning graphs. Bell System Technical Journal 49:291–307. doi:10.1002/bltj.1970.49.issue-2.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. A., and R. Phalak. 2012. A trust prediction framework in rating-based experience sharing social networks without a web of trust. Information Sciences 191:128–45. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2011.12.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., E.-P. Lim, H. W. Lauw, M.-T. Le, A. Sun, J. Srivastava, and Y. A. Kim. 2008. Predicting trusts among users of online communities: An epinions case study. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Electronic commerce. Chicago, IL: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, N., E.-P. Lim, V.-A. Nguyen, A. Sun, and H. Liu. 2009. Trust relationship prediction using online product review data. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on complex networks meet information & knowledge management. Hong Kong, China: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Mamdani, E. H., and S. Assilian. 1975. An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 7:1–13. doi:10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80002-2.
   Google Scholar
• Massa, P., and P. Avesani. 2005. Controversial users demand local trust metrics: An experimental study on epinions.com community. In Proceedings of the 20th national conference on artificial intelligence, vol.1. Pittsburgh, PA: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massa, P., and P. Avesani. 2006. Trust-aware bootstrapping of recommender systems. Paper presented at ECAI 2006 Workshop on Recommender Systems August 28–29, Riva del Garda, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Massa, P., and P. Avesani. 2007. Trust metrics on controversial users: Balancing between tyranny of the majority and echo chambers, International Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems 3:39–64 doi:10.4018/jswis.2007010103.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuo, Y., and H. Yamamoto. 2009. Community gravity: Measuring bidirectional effects by trust and rating on online social networks. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on world wide web. Madrid, Spain: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., J. H. Davis, and F. D. Schoorman. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review 20:709–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. J. 2004a. Detecting community structure in networks. The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 38:321–30. doi:10.1140/epjb/e2004-00124-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. J. 2004b. Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Physical Review E 69, 066133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, V.-A., E.-P. Lim, J. Jiang, and A. Sun. 2009. To trust or not to trust? Predicting online trusts using trust antecedent framework. In Proceedings of the 2009 ninth IEEE international conference on data mining. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T. 2009. What is web 2.0. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
   Google Scholar
• Page, L., S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. 1999. The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Stanford, CA: Stanford InfoLab.
   Google Scholar
• Ruhnau, B. 2000. Eigenvector-centrality—A node-centrality? Social Networks 22:357–65. doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(00)00031-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., and P. Singh. 2012. A novel soft computing-based retrieval system for medical applications. Applied Artificial Intelligence 26:645–61. doi:10.1080/08839514.2012.701423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugeno, M. 1985. Industrial applications of fuzzy control. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, P.-N., M. Steinbach, and V. Kumar. 2005. Introduction to data mining. San Francisco, CA: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Toosi, A. N., and M. Kahani. 2007. A novel soft computing model using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for intrusion detection. Paper presented at IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, 2007, April 15–17, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Witten, I. H., and E. Frank. 2005. Data mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, G., Y. Zhang, and L. Li. 2010. Web mining and social networking: Techniques and applications. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Zolfaghar, K., and A. Aghaie. 2012. A syntactical approach for interpersonal trust prediction in social web applications: Combining contextual and structural data. Knowledge-Based Systems 26:93–102. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2010.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar