References
- Breazeal, C. 2002. Designing sociable robots. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
- Breazeal, C., and J. Markoff. 2014. A robot with a little humanity. New York Times Online. http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/07/16/a-robot-with-a-little-humanity/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0 ( accessed July 16).
- Calo, R. 2015. Robotics and the new cyberlaw. California Law Review 103. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2402972.
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. 2010. Tri-council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdf.
- Chang, R. 2002. The possibility of parity. Ethics 112:659–88. doi:10.1086/339673.
- Chang, R. 2012. Are hard choices cases of incomparability? Philosophical Issues 22:106–26. doi:10.1111/phis.2012.22.issue-1.
- Collins, H., and R. Evans. 2007. Rethinking expertise. Chicago, Illinois, USA: University of Chicago Press.
- Darling, K. 2015. ‘Who’s Johnny?’ Anthropomorphic framing in human-robot interaction, integration, and policy. In We Robot 2015 Proceedings. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2588669.
- Duffy, B. R. 2003. Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42:177–90. doi:10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00374-3.
- Freidman, B., P. H. Kahn, and A. Borning. 2006. Value sensitive design and information systems. In Human–Computer interaction in management information systems: Foundations, eds P. Zhang, and D. Galletta, 348–72. New York, New York, USA: M. E. Sharpe.
- Friedman, B., and P. H. Kahn Jr. 2003. Human values, ethics, and design. In The human–computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications, eds Julie A. Jacko and Andrew Sears, 1127–1201. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Friedman, B., P. H. Kahn, and A. Borning 2002. Value sensitive design: Theory and methods. (Technical Report), University of Washington, Washington, Seattle/Washington, USA.
- Jibo. 2014. Jibo.com. http://www.jibo.com.
- Jonsen, A. R. 2008. A short history of medical ethics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Latour, B. 1992. Where are the missing masses: The sociology of a few mundane artefacts. In Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change, eds W. E. Bijker, and J. Law, 225–58. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
- Latour, B. 1999. Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Millar, J. 2014a. Facebook – our fFriendly automated identity bender. Robohub.org. http://robohub.org/facebook-our-ffriendly-automated-identity-bender/ ( accessed July 11).
- Millar, J. 2014b. You should have a say in your robot car’s code of ethics. WIRED.com. http://www.wired.com/2014/09/set-the-ethics-robot-car/ ( accessed Sept 2).
- Millar, J. 2014c. An ethical dilemma: When robot cars must kill, who should pick the victim? Robohub.org. http://robohub.org/an-ethical-dilemma-when-robot-cars-must-kill-who-should-pick-the-victim/ ( accessed June 11).
- Millar, J. 2014d. Should your robot driver kill you to save a child’s life? The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/should-your-robot-driver-kill-you-to-save-a-childs-life-29926 ( accessed Aug 1).
- Millar, J. 2015. Technology as moral proxy: Autonomy and paternalism by design. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 34 (2):47–55. doi:10.1109/MTS.2015.2425612.
- Ngai, D. 2010. Turning off the implantable cardiac defibrillator to prevent pre-death electrical shocks: An exercise and right in the refusal of medical treatment. The Internet Journal of Law, Healthcare and Ethics 1 (7):1–13.
- Norman, D. 1988. The design of everyday things. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books.
- Norman, D. 2010. Living with complexity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
- Open Roboethics initiative. 2014b. Results: My (autonomous) car, my safety. Openroboethics.org. http://www.openroboethics.org/results-my-autonomous-car-my-safety/.
- Open Roboethics Initiative. 2014a. If death by autonomous car is unavoidable, who should die? Results from our reader poll. Robohub.org. http://robohub.org/if-a-death-by-an-autonomous-car-is-unavoidable-who-should-die-results-from-our-reader-poll/.
- Pollock, A. 2008. The internal cardiac defibrillator. In The inner history of devices, ed. S. Turkle, 98–111. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
- Proudfoot, D. 2011. Anthropomorphism and AI: Turing’s much misunderstood imitation game. Artificial Intelligence 175:950–57. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2011.01.006.
- Riek, L., and D. Howard 2014. A code of ethics for the human-robot interaction profession. In Proceedings of We Robot 2014. http://robots.law.miami.edu/2014/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/a-code-of-ethics-for-the-human-robot-interaction-profession-riek-howard.pdf.
- van Wynsberghe, A. 2013. Designing robots for care: Care centered value-sensitive design. Science and Engineering Ethics 19:407–33. doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9343-6.
- van Wynsberghe, A. 2014. The leadership role of the ethicist: Balancing between the authoritative and the passive. International Journal of Technoethics 5 (2):11–21. doi:10.4018/IJT.
- van Wynsberghe, A., and S. Robins. 2013. Ethicist as designer: A pragmatic approach to ethics in the lab. Science and Engineering Ethics 20:947–61. doi:10.1007/s11948-013-9498-4.
- Verbeek, P.-P. 2006. Materializing morality: Design ethics and technological mediation. Science, Technology and Human Values 31:361–80. doi:10.1177/0162243905285847.
- Verbeek, P.-P. 2011. Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. Chicago, Illinois, USA: University of Chicago Press.