A New Image Mining Approach for Detecting Micro-Calcification in Digital Mammograms

References

• Abirami, C., R. Harikumar, and S. R. Sannasi Chakravarthy. 2016. Performance analysis and detection of micro calcification in digital mammograms using wavelet feature. International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET), 23–25. doi:10.1109/WiSPNET.2016.7566558.
   Google Scholar
• Abraham, D., S. Stanly Johson, and S. Selvan. 2014. Texture feature extraction using gray level statistical matrix for content-based mammogram retrieval. Multimedia Tools and Applications 2011–24. doi:10.1007/s11042-013-1511-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anitha, J., and J. D. Peter 2012. A wavelet based morphological mass detection and classification in mammograms. International Conference on Machine Vision and Image Processing (MVIP), 25–28. doi:10.1109/MVIP.2012.6428752.
   Google Scholar
• Arden, S. S., W. Julian, and Y. Purnama 2015. Mammogram classification using Law’s Texture energy measure and neural networks. International Conference on Computer Science and Computational Intelligence(ICCSCI), 92–97. Jakarta, Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Aarthi, R., K. Divyana, N. Komala, and S. Kavitha 2011. Application of feature extraction and clustering in mammogram classification using support vector machine. Third International Conference on Advanced Computing (ICoAC), pp. 62–67. doi: 10.1109/ICoAC.2011.6165150.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, K., J. Goldstein, R. Ramakrishnan, and U. Shaft 1999. When is nearest neighbor meaningful. In Proceedings of International Conference, Database Theory (ICDT). pp. 217–35. Jerusalem, Israel.
   Google Scholar
• Dominguez, A. R., and A. K. Nandi 2007. Enhanced multi-level thresholding segmentation and rank based region selection for detection of masses in mammograms. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, I-449–I-452. doi: 10.1109/ICASSP.2007.366713.
   Google Scholar
• Kadah, Y. M., and M. Wael. 2007. Computer aided diagnosis of digital mammograms. International Conference on Computer Engineering & Systems, 299–303. doi: 10.1109/ICCES.2007.4447063.
   Google Scholar
• Kamra, A., V. K. Jain, and S. Singh. 2016. Characterization of architectural distortion in mammograms based on texture analysis using support vector machine classifier with clinical evaluation. Journal of Digital Imaging 104–14. doi:10.1007/s10278-015-9807-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malar, E., D. Kandaswamy, and A. Chakravarthy. 2012. A novel approach for detection and classification of mammographic microcalcifications using wavelet analysis and extreme learning machine. Computers in Biology and Medicine 898–905. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2012.07.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murali, S., and K. P. Sathee. 2015. Multiclass classification of mammogram images with GLCM features. International Journal of Engineering Research and Science& Technology 56–62:2319–5991.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, H., L. I. Jianzhong, and W. Zhang. 2007. Incorporating domain knowledge into medical image clustering. Applied Mathematics and Computation 844–56. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2006.06.083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, H., H. Qilong, and Y. Guisheng 2008. A ROI-based mining method with medical domain knowledge guidance. International Conference on Internet Computing in Science and Engineering, pp. 91–97. doi: 10.1109/ICICSE.2008.91.
   Google Scholar
• Sanae, B., S. Elmargae, M. AtiKerroum, and Y. Fakhri 2014. Statistical block-based DWT features for digital mammograms classification. In 9th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications (SITA-14), pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1109/SITA.2014.6847307.
   Google Scholar
• Senthilkumar, J., J. K. Kavitha, D. Manjula, and R. Krishnamoorthy 2009. ADMID: An association rule discovery for mammogram image diagnosis. 22nd IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1109/CBMS.2009.5255419.
   Google Scholar
• Smeltzer, S. C., B. G. Bare, J. L. Hinkle, and K. H. Cheever. 2010. Textbook of medical-surgical nursing. Philadelphia, United State: Lippincott William&Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Vapnik, V. 1998. Statistical learning theory, 1st ed. Hoboken, United State: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Vapnik, V., and A. Chervonenkis. 1998. The necessary and sufficient conditions for consistency in the empirical risk minimization method. In Pattern recognition and image analysis, ed. Yuri I. Zhuravlev, pp. 283–305. Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wael, M., and Y. M. Kadah 2007. Computer aided diagnosis of digital mammograms. International Conference on Computer Engineering & Systems. pp. 299–303. doi: 10.1109/ICCES.2007.4447063.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H., L. L. Huang, and X. J. Zhaho 2007. Automated detection of masses in digital mammograms based on pyramid. International Conference on Wavelet Analysis and Pattern Recognition, pp. 183–87. doi: 10.1109/ICWAPR.2007.4420660.
   Google Scholar
• Zachman, J. A. 1987. A framework for information systems architecture. IBM SystemsJournal 276–92. doi:10.1147/sj.263.0276.
   Google Scholar
• Zaiane, O., J. Han, Z. Li, and J. Hou 1988. Mining multimedia data. CASCON ‘98 Proceedings of the 1998conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research, Toronto, pp. 24–36.
   Google Scholar