Subjective Evaluation: A Comparison of Several Statistical Techniques

References

• Attali, Y., and J. Burstein. 2006. Automated essay scoring with E-rater? V.2.0. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment 4 (3):e–journal.
   Google Scholar
• Bin, L., L. Jun, Y. Jian-Min, and Z. Qiao-Ming, (2008), Automated essay scoring using the knn algorithm, International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, IEEE, Vol. 1, pp 735–738. DOI 10.1109/CSSE.2008.623
   Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M., A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3 (5):993–1022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burstein, J., K. Kukich, S. Wolff, L. Chi, M. Chodorow, L. Braden-Harder, and M. D. Harris, (1998), Automated scoring using a hybrid feature identification technique, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics and International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 1, 206–10. Doi: 10.315/980451.980879.
   Google Scholar
• Burstein, J., and D. Marcu, (2000), Towards using text summarization for essay-based feedback, Le 7e Conference Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles TALN’2000.
   Google Scholar
• Callear, D., J. Jerrams-Smith, and V. Soh, (2001), Bridging gaps in computerized assessment of texts, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Techniques (ICALT’01), IEEE, 139–49.
   Google Scholar
• Cutrone, L., and M. Chang, (2010), Automarking: automatic assessment of open questions, 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, IEEE, 143–47.
   Google Scholar
• Deerwester, S., S. T. Dumais, G. W. Furnas, T. K. Landauer, and R. Harshman. 1990. Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41:391–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foltz, P. W., D. Laham, and T. K. Landauer. 1999. Automated essay scoring: applications to educational technology. In Proceedings of EDMedia’99, Eds. B. Collis, and R. Oliver, pp. 939–944. Charlottesville, VA: Association of Computing in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Foltz, P. W., and T. K. Landauer. 1998. The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes 25 (2&3):285–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, T., (1999), Probabilistic Latent Semantic Indexing Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’99).
   Google Scholar
• Islam, M., and A. S. M. L. Hoque, (2010), Automated essay scoring using generalized latent semantic analysis, Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, pp. 358–363.
   Google Scholar
• Kakkonen, T., N. Myller, E. Sutinen, and J. Timonen. 2008. Comparison of dimension reduction methods for automated essay grading. Educational Technology & Society 11 (3):275–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, N. H., L. T. Frase, P. S. Gingrich, and S. A. Keenan. 1982. The writer’s workbench: computer aids for text analysis. IEEE Transactions on Communications 30 (1):105–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matlab Control- https://code.google.com/p/matlabcontrol/ (accessed on 31-Dec-2015
   Google Scholar
• Mittal, H., and M. Syamala Devi, “Subjective evaluation using hybrid technique”, Proceedings of International Conference on Innovations in Computer Science and Engineering, Springer-Verlag, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Page, E. B. 1994. Computer grading of student prose. Using Modern Concepts and Software, the Journal of Experimental Education 62 (2):127–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez, D., A. Gliozzo, C. Strapparava, E. Alfonseca, P. Rodrýguez, and B. Magnini, (2005), Automatic assessment of students’ free-text answers underpinned by the combination of a bleu-inspired algorithm and latent semantic analysis, Proceedings of 18th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, Flairs, AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, C. P., A. Roque, D. Bhembe, and K. VanLehn. 2003. A hybrid approach to content analysis for automatic essay grading. Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of Association of Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology 2:88–90. doi:10.3115/1073483.1073513.
   Google Scholar
• Rudner, L. M., and T. Liang. 2002. Automated essay scoring using bayes’ theorem. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment 1 (2):e–journal.
   Google Scholar
• Shermis, M. D., H. R. Mzumara, J. Olson, and S. Harrington. 2001. On-line grading of student essays: PEG goes on the World Wide Web. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 26 (3):247–59.
   Google Scholar
• Sukkarieh, J. Z. 2011. Using a maxent classifier for the automatic content scoring of free-text responses. American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings 1305 (1):41.
   Google Scholar
• Sukkarieh, J. Z., and J. Blackmore, (2009), c-rater: automatic content scoring for short constructed responses, Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International FLAIRS Conference, AAAI Press, pp. 290–295.
   Google Scholar